English-Language Learners

Advisory Commission On Bilingual Program Attacks US Studies

By Susan G. Foster — December 21, 1981 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A collection of studies commissioned by the Education Department (ed) and made public as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request was denounced by members of the National Advisory Council on Bilingual Education (nacbe) during their meeting in Washington last week.

Negative Effects

And, alarmed by what the members view as the negative effects of the widespread publicity given the studies’ findings debunking the effectiveness of bilingual education, the advisory council formally asked Secretary of Education Terrel H. Bell both to clarify ed’s position concerning the studies and to direct the inspector general’s office of the department to “look at how the reports came to be.”

The action was sparked by a lobbyist’s disclosure at the meeting of two pending events that nacbe members found “disturbing": a letter indicating that Senator Walter D. Huddleston, Democrat of Kentucky, intends to introduce a bill in Congress that would limit the scope of the bilingual-education program; and a confidential memorandum revealing plans by the Office of Management and Budget to cut funding to less than half of last year’s level for 1983.

The controversial studies were begun under the Carter Administration to assist the Education Department in its review of proposed language-minority regulations--the now-infamous Lau regulations--that were promulgated in August 1980 in response to a 1978 court order that mandated specific guidelines for educating language-minority children. The regulations were withdrawn early this year by Secretary Bell.

Studies Conducted

The studies were conducted by private contractors and by staff members of ed’s office of planning, budget, and evaluation. At least one of the studies was, according to its authors, intended for use only by department officials.

But the studies, drafts of which had been circulating privately in Washington, were obtained by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information Act in September and subsequently introduced as evidence by lawyers for the state of Texas, which is appealing a federal judge’s order mandating bilingual-education programs through the 12th grade in Texas schools. The presiding judge in that case, however, ruled the documents inadmissible as evidence, according to a Texas school official.

Since then, although proponents of bilingual education from two offices within ed--the Office for Civil Rights and the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs--are said to have been critical of the studies and have urged that they be “buried,” the studies have been widely reviewed and quoted.

Effectiveness Studied

The studies examined the effectiveness of bilingual education, the number of children served, the availability of teachers, the socio-economic factors affecting learning, and the costs connected with the bilingual-education program.

A summary of the studies recommended a reconsideration of federal policy for “language-minority” students.

One of the studies, “Effectiveness of Bilingual Education: A Review of the Literature,” questions “federal policy promoting transitional bilin-gual education without adequate evidence of its effectiveness.’'

In the transitional method, limited-English-proficient students are taught subjects in their native language until they are able to participate in classes taught in English. The study, however, concludes that the “structured immersion” method, in which bilingual teachers are used but instruction is given in English, should be given more attention in program development.

‘Policy-Making Process’

The study was written by ed researchers Keith A. Baker and Adriana A. de Kanter for the “internal policy-making process,” according to Mr. Baker.

There have been persistent “attempts to have the report buried,” Mr. Baker said. He said most of the criticism has been politically motivated by a “bunch of people who view the program as the government’s special gift.”

“They begin with the premise that bilingual education is effective and it works,” Mr. Baker said. “They get offended when someone comes along who says it may not work.”

After reviewing 300 research studies of bilingual programs, the Baker-de Kanter study accepted only 28 case studies that were “methodologically applicable for our concerns.” Their study admits in its conclusions that “schools can improve the achievement of language-minority children through special programs.” But it also concludes that, “There is no justification for assuming that it is necessary to teach ... subjects in the native tongue in order for the language-minority child to make satisfactory progress in school.”

A second report written by staff members within ed and entitled “Size of the Eligible Language-Minority Population,” asserts that only about one-third of the estimated 3.6 million children that experts claim need bilingual education actually do need it.

Although department officials are currently working to determine a new Administration policy for bilingual education, a department spokesman questioned recently did not know whether the bilingual studies were being used as a resource.

Heavy Local Control

The spokesman added that the Reagan Administration--unlike the Carter Administration--is likely to decide on a bilingual education policy that relies heavily on local control.

That statement is supported by some of the language in the omb document, which spells out the budget office’s plans for the program in 1983.

The proposal would cut funding for bilingual education from $157.5 million in 1981 to $71.6 million in 1983. It would also reduce by more than one-half the number of children who could be served by the program--from 269,357 to 123,195.

Definition Change

In addition, the document states, “We are also proposing to change the statutory definition of bilingual education programs. Districts will be encouraged to develop a program responsive to the perceived needs of district children instead of tailoring their program to a federally imposed model.”

During their meeting last week, members of the advisory council expressed concern that the studies’ negative findings were undermining current bilingual-education programs, and they agreed to hold public hearings next month to collect testimony that would counteract the studies’ impact.

Russell N. Campbell of the Center for Applied Linguistics in Washington and a member of the advisory council, said the studies are not only “biased” but “malicious” in their intent.

A version of this article appeared in the December 21, 1981 edition of Education Week as Advisory Commission On Bilingual Program Attacks US Studies

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

English-Language Learners What All Teachers Should Know About WIDA's Test for English Learners
Researchers and specialists say general education teachers play a role in helping English learners' language development.
7 min read
ELL Girl Laptop 052024 176654360
Marilyn Nieves/Getty
English-Language Learners Opinion When Teaching English Learners, Embrace These 3 Critical Mindsets
English learners will have more success if teachers adjust their thinking. Here's how.
4 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
English-Language Learners ‘A Unique Challenge’: What English Learners With Disabilities Need
From language barriers to bilingual education program lockouts, dual-identified students face unique challenges researchers say.
7 min read
Student trying to navigate a landscape of a different language
Nicole Xu for Education Week
English-Language Learners The Complex Factors Affecting English-Learner Graduation Rates
A new study disaggregated New York City graduation rates to find how various factors impact English learners' graduation rates.
3 min read
Teeanage students doing a test in the classroom
Researchers at New York University and the University of Houston recommend educators break down English-learner data by various sociological factors.
E+ / Getty