Law & Courts

Yonkers Desegregation Suit May Be Nearing End

By Karla Scoon Reid — January 16, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The decades-old desegregation case in Yonkers, N.Y., could end this year if a federal court approves a settlement that would pump an additional $300 million in state money into the struggling school district.

“This agreement will give the local schools back to the children, parents, and teachers of Yonkers,” Gov. George E. Pataki of New York said at a Jan. 8 news conference announcing the pact. “Now, we can focus all of our energy and resources on providing the finest education possible for the children of Yonkers.”

But the accord reached last week by state officials, the local school board, the city, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People does not mean the parties agree about the lingering effects of racial segregation on the 26,400-student district.

Joseph M. Pastore Jr., the court-appointed monitor who helped mediate the agreement, said that the plaintiffs—the NAACP and the federal government—believe that vestiges of 40 years of segregation continue to negatively affect Yonkers’ students. The city, the school board, and the state, however, contend that there is no relationship between poor student performance and segregation.

U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand, who in 1985 found that the city and the district were responsible for racially segregating the schools, still must sign off on the five-year agreement, which would return control of the district to the local school board members, who are appointed by the mayor.

The deal calls for the state to give the district $70 million this year and $230 million over the next four years, money that must be used to introduce and maintain programs to improve the academic performance of all students. Those efforts include magnet programs, smaller class sizes, and full- day kindergarten. About 75 percent of Yonkers’ students are African-American, Hispanic, or Asian.

A newly appointed compliance officer would monitor the agreement. The naming of a compliance officer, who could not be fired by the district, was key to gaining the NAACP’s support for the plan, said Leonard Buddington, the president of Yonkers’ NAACP chapter.

The agreement was set to be submitted to the court this week. Judge Sand is expected to rule on the case within the next month.

Financial Factors

For Yonkers, the settlement concludes a contentious legal battle that began in 1980 and included charges that the city encouraged segregated housing. The school agreement does not affect pending housing litigation.

After years of wrangling, why was an agreement reached now?

In 1999, a federal appeals court ruled that the district’s racial disparities in student achievement were not solely the result of segregation, signaling a significant shift in the balance of legal power and giving the state and the city their first significant victory.

A year later, Mr. Pastore said, Gov. Pataki, a Republican, gave the district $10 million in “good-faith money” to spark settlement discussions.

In addition, the district was facing the fallout of a struggling economy in 2001 and the resulting crimp in state education spending, Mr. Pastore said. Restoring financial stability to the district was paramount to closing the deal.

But Mr. Pastore and Mr. Buddington cautioned that money alone would not resolve the dispute. The plaintiffs wanted to guarantee that programs remained in place to address racial and ethnic academic disparities.

If Judge Sand approves the deal, the district, the city, and New York state will not be obligated to continue any programs past 2006, when the agreement would expire. Mr. Pastore said that the district and the city would have to examine ways to cut costs and find additional money to keep the programs running.

Mr. Buddington said he was relying on the programs’ success to influence both city and state officials to continue to allocate the money to sustain them. Still, he said, it would be up to local residents to serve as watchdogs and pressure officials to continue those programs.

“This is our opportunity over the next five years to deal with institutional racism and deal with institutional reform,” he said.

A version of this article appeared in the January 16, 2002 edition of Education Week as Yonkers Desegregation Suit May Be Nearing End


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Assessment Webinar
The State of Assessment in K-12 Education
What is the impact of assessment on K-12 education? What does that mean for administrators, teachers and most importantly—students?
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs January 2022 Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Proven Strategies to Improve Reading Scores
In this webinar, education and reading expert Stacy Hurst will provide a look at some of the biggest issues facing curriculum coordinators, administrators, and teachers working in reading education today. You will: Learn how schools
Content provided by Reading Horizons

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Major Cases on Affirmative Action in Education
The outcome could affect K-12 policies when the justices rule on race-based policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.
3 min read
A man talks on his phone on the steps of Harvard University's Widener Library, in Cambridge, Mass. on June 26, 2020.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up major cases on affirmative action in admissions at Harvard University, above, and at the University of North Carolina.
Elise Amendola/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Hear Case of Coach Who Prayed After Games in Defiance of School District
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether school districts may prohibit private religious expression by public school employees.
4 min read
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy is in a conflict with the Bremerton, 
Wash., school district over his silent prayer after games.
Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joseph A. Kennedy stands at on the 50-yard line at Bremerton Memorial Stadium. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal over his dismissal for praying after football games.
Larry Steagall/Kitsap Sun via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Mandate Applying to Schools in Much of the Country
The justices ruled 6-3 to stay an Occupational Health and Safety Administration rule that covered schools in 26 states and two territories.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo last April.
The U.S. Supreme Court blocked a federal vaccine mandate for large employers, including school districts in about half the states.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP
Law & Courts Students Lose Appeal on Right to Civics Education, But Win Praise From Judges Anyway
A federal appellate court panel commended Rhode Island students for the novel effort, but said Supreme Court precedent stood in the way.
3 min read
Scales of justice and Gavel on wooden table and Lawyer or Judge working with agreement in Courtroom, Justice and Law concept.
Pattanaphong Khuankaew/iStock