Law & Courts

U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh NCAA Rules on Education-Related Aid for Student-Athletes

By Mark Walsh — December 16, 2020 2 min read
In this Nov. 5, 2020 photo, The Supreme Court is seen in Washington.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to take up a major case about whether the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s rules limiting the amount of education-related aid that student-athletes may receive violate federal antitrust law.

The case arises amid debates about whether student-athletes, especially in the top revenue-producing sports of football and basketball, should be compensated as employees. The case granted review, however, is more specifically about an athlete-led challenge to limits on the amount of payments “related to education” that go beyond athletic scholarships to cover items such as computers and science equipment as well as financial aid for internships, study abroad, or post-eligibility graduate instruction.

A federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in San Francisco, ruled that the NCAA could continue to limit payments unrelated to education, or “pay for play,” but that its limits on education-related aid were a form of restraint of trade that violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The NCAA, as well as the top collegiate athletic conferences, appealed to the high court.

“The 9th Circuit’s decision will turn student-athletes into professionals, eradicating the pro-competitive differentiation that this court and others have recognized as the decades-long hallmark of NCAA sports,” the college governing body said in court papers. “The decision allows unlimited payments to student-athletes, so long as payments like uncapped internships can somehow be described as ‘related to education.’”

The student-athletes in the suit, which includes Division 1 male and female basketball players and Football Bowl Subdivision players, argued in their response that the massive sums the NCAA and conferences receive in broadcast rights for football and basketball “allow schools to spend lavishly, including on seven-figure coaches’ salaries and palatial athletic facilities. Yet the elite athletes in these sports—the ones whose talent and labor make it all possible—receive almost none of this revenue.”

The athletes contend that the NCAA and the conferences are seeking “nothing less than antitrust immunity,” which they must seek from Congress, not the courts.

The athletes note that in the wake of decisions in a separate case that invalidated NCAA rules barring student-athletes from being paid for licensing their names, images, and likenesses (such as in ads or videogames), five states have passed laws allowing such compensation, with bills in Congress that would do the same. Now is not the time for the Supreme Court to get involved, the student-athletes argued.

But the court nonetheless granted review in NCAA v. Alston (Case No 20-512) and American Athletic Conference v. Alston (No. 20-520). The consolidated cases will likely be argued sometime next spring, with a decision expected by late June.

Related Tags:


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Conservatives’ Checklist: U.S. Supreme Court Education Decisions to Overrule
Here are five education issues that could be targets for reconsideration if Roe v. Wade falls.
3 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, Dec. 3, 2021. The Supreme Court has turned away a plea from parents to block a new admissions policy at a prestigious high school in northern Virginia that a lower court had found discriminates against Asian American students.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 3, 2021.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts Leaked Abortion Draft Has Supreme Court Education Cases in Political Cross-Hairs
Conservatives have taken aim at decisions on educating immigrants, race in admissions, and religion. Liberals have some cases in mind, too.
8 min read
supreme court SOC
Law & Courts 'Brown v. Board' Cited in Draft Supreme Court Opinion to Back Overturning Abortion Rights
The leaked opinion in a case still to be decided by the Supreme Court cites landmark decisions including Brown v. Board of Education.
7 min read
A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Monday night, May 2, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion circulated among Supreme Court justices suggests that earlier this year a majority of them had thrown support behind overturning the 1973 case Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a report published Monday night in Politico. It's unclear if the draft represents the court's final word on the matter. The Associated Press could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the draft Politico posted, which if verified marks a shocking revelation of the high court's secretive deliberation process, particularly before a case is formally decided.
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court Monday night after the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the court intends to overturn the 1973 <i>Roe v. Wade</i> precedent that legalized abortion nationwide.
Alex Brandon/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Rules Against Some 'Emotional Distress' Claims. What It Means for Schools
The dissenters say the decision means students cannot recover damages for the emotional harms of race, sex, or disability bias.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.