Accountability

State Accountability Systems Aren’t Actually Helping Schools Improve

A new report looks at state accountability systems under the Every Student Succeeds Act
By Libby Stanford — September 26, 2024 6 min read
Image of a classroom under a magnifying glass.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The main mechanism under federal law to support school improvement often fails to do its job, according to a new report from EdTrust, a nonprofit advocacy group focused on equity in education.

The report examines how state accountability systems have evolved in the near decade since Congress passed the Every Student Succeeds Act. The law provided more flexibility than its predecessor, the No Child Left Behind Act, in how states could design their accountability systems and help low-performing schools improve.

No Child Left Behind required states to identify schools for improvement with the goal of getting every student to proficiency for their grade level by 2014. The law imposed increasingly serious sanctions on schools that continually failed to make “adequate yearly progress” in test scores.

See Also

ESSA, passed in 2015, allowed states to expand the definition of school quality to include academic growth rather than just standardized test scores. It also allowed states to give schools more credit for the strategies they used to help students improve.

But while most states have adapted their accountability systems under ESSA, they’re still far from being truly equitable, the report found.

About half of states use ESSA’s school identification process, which determines which schools need to improve, to ensure schools with performance disparities among students of color can access state and federal resources to fix those disparities, the report said. Only 11 states include information on the performance of individual student groups, like students with disabilities and low-income students, in their overall school performance rating.

And no states have set rigorous exit criteria to ensure schools identified as needing improvement “are effectively making meaningful and sustainable progress toward improved student outcomes,” the report said.

“Unfortunately, states have a long way to go in terms of centering equity in their accountability systems, particularly thinking about how they’re rating schools and identifying schools for support,” said Nicholas Munyan-Penney, assistant director of P-12 policy at EdTrust and one of the authors of the report.

EdTrust’s analysis is the latest report this year to point out the shortcomings of state accountability systems under ESSA. In January, the Government Accountability Office examined a sample of district plans for improving their lowest-performing schools, and found that fewer than half met federal requirements even though states had approved them. As a result, schools in need of improvement—the bottom 5 percent in a state—were left without clear improvement strategies and didn’t receive dedicated resources to execute turnarounds, Congress’ nonpartisan watchdog found.

See Also

A group of silhouettes looks across a grid with a public school on the other side.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week via Canva

Not all measures of academic growth work the same

Most states now measure student academic growth, in addition to raw student performance, in their accountability systems, according to the report. Academic growth allows schools to show that they are helping students develop their knowledge and skills, even if they fall short of the annual testing benchmark for proficiency, making accountability systems “more reflective of what a student has actually learned,” the report said.

One thing the report highlights is that the different ways of measuring growth have tradeoffs. States use a variety of ways to measure academic growth, some more technically sophisticated than others. Twenty-four use what’s called a student growth percentile model, which assesses students’ progress compared to peers with similar scores on state assessments.

EdTrust argues the student growth percentile can give “a misleading impression of the progress schools are making” because a student who made little to no progress toward grade level proficiency can still have a positive student growth percentile score as long as other students around the state performed worse.

“That’s particularly impactful in the wake of the pandemic, when lots of students were falling behind,” Munyan-Penney said.

Instead, EdTrust recommends states use a value-table measure of growth, which 13 states use, according to the report. Value-table systems measure students’ performance year to year, crediting schools when students move up within a performance level, or from one performance level to the next.

Eight states use a value-added growth model to measure student performance gains. The model uses a formula to measure how attending a specific school improves a student’s test score compared to a typical school in the state. These growth measures often control for student demographics like race and ethnicity, but EdTrust argues this can lead to different targets for different student groups.

Many states fail to account for the performance of specific student populations in their accountability systems, the report said. One of the original objectives of No Child Left Behind was to spotlight performance differences among various student subgroups.

States set an “n-size,” or a minimum number of students required for a student group to be included in a school’s ratings calculations. The law does not specify a number.

Seventeen states use an n-size of 20, and 13 have even higher n-sizes, according to the report. In practice, what that means is that if a school in a state with an n-size of 20 for Black students only has 19 Black students, those students’ growth isn’t reflected in the accountability system.

EdTrust recommends that states set their n-size to 10 students. Currently, 13 states meet that threshold, according to the report.

States can do more to help struggling schools improve

One of the core goals of accountability systems is to help schools improve.

The EdTrust report found that 30 states require schools to show growth to exit from their improvement status, and 11 of those states also require schools to participate in improvement activities, which can include strategies such as conducting a strengths and needs assessment of the school or developing ways to help English learners improve, to exit their improvement status.

EdTrust recommends that states set exit criteria that require schools to show substantial improvement that can be sustained, and participate meaningfully in school improvement measures. No states meet those recommendations, according to the report.

“States have large latitude in the way they fund school improvement,” Munyan-Penney said. “They get to set aside 7 percent of their Title I dollars to fund school improvement, but there just isn’t a lot of information out there about how that’s being done.”

The report recommended that states and the federal government set more rigorous exit criteria for schools identified as needing improvement to move beyond that status. The federal government should also increase its monitoring of state’s school improvement measures, the report said.

States should be “really thinking about how [they] can be leveraging the school improvement provision of ESSA that exists already and supplementing those with additional state resources to make sure that schools that are low-performing, not serving students as well as they could be, are getting access to the support they need,” Munyan-Penney said.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
(Re)Focus on Dyslexia: Moving Beyond Diagnosis & Toward Transformation
Move beyond dyslexia diagnoses & focus on effective literacy instruction for ALL students. Join us to learn research-based strategies that benefit learners in PreK-8.
Content provided by EPS Learning
Classroom Technology Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Is AI Out to Take Your Job or Help You Do It Better?
With all of the uncertainty K-12 educators have around what AI means might mean for the future, how can the field best prepare young people for an AI-powered future?
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Understanding Learning Differences
Join this free virtual event for insights that will help educators better understand and support students with learning differences.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Accountability Opinion What’s Wrong With Online Credit Recovery? This Teacher Will Tell You
The “whatever it takes” approach to increasing graduation rates ends up deflating the value of a diploma.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Accountability Why a Judge Stopped Texas from Issuing A-F School Ratings
Districts argued the new metric would make it appear as if schools have worsened—even though outcomes have actually improved in many cases.
2 min read
Laura BakerEducation Week via Canva  (1)
Canva
Accountability Why These Districts Are Suing to Stop Release of A-F School Ratings
A change in how schools will be graded has prompted legal action from about a dozen school districts in Texas.
4 min read
Handwritten red letter grades cover a blue illustration of a classic brick school building.
Laura Baker, Canva
Accountability What the Research Says What Should Schools Do to Build on 20 Years of NCLB Data?
The education law yielded a cornucopia of student information, but not scalable turnaround for schools, an analysis finds.
3 min read
Photo of magnifying glass and charts.
iStock / Getty Images Plus