Education Funding

Spending Debate

By David J. Hoff — December 06, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Requiring that districts spend 65 percent of their budgets on classroom expenses is a common-sense rule that will improve schools, backers of the idea argue.

But that’s not necessarily so, say school finance researchers at one of the nation’s most respected financial-analysis firms.

The S&P paper, “The Implications of the “65 Percent Solution,” is available from SchoolMatters.

In a new study of school spending in nine states, researchers at Standard & Poor’s found no correlation between a district’s achievement and the percentage of its budget earmarked for classroom costs.

“Some of the highest-performing districts spend less than 65 percent, and some of the lowest-performing districts spend more than 65 percent,” S&P researchers write in “The Issues and Implications of the ‘65 Percent Solution,’ ” released Nov. 22.

“Student performance does not noticeably or consistently increase at 65 percent, or any other percentage spent on instruction,” the New York City-based firm says.

Standard & Poor’s issued the report in response to First Class Education, a Washington-based group working to pass statewide measures to require districts to spend 65 percent of their budgets on classroom expenses, such as teacher salaries, textbooks, and other supplies. Professional development, transportation, food services, and administrative costs count as nonclassroom expenses in the proposals.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, has signed an executive order requiring schools to implement the group’s agenda. The group is also trying to put the so-called 65 Percent Solution on ballots in Arizona, Colorado, and other states next year. (“Group’s ‘65 Percent Solution’ Gains Traction, GOP Friends,” Oct. 12, 2005.)

While officials with First Class Education agreed that the 65 percent rule wouldn’t guarantee higher achievement, they said in a statement responding to the S&P paper that their proposal would be “the beginning of a dialogue between parents and taxpayers, teachers and administrators of how best to allocate precious and finite resources.”

According to S&P, spending 65 percent or more on classroom costs “is no guarantee that [money] will be used effectively.” For example, its report says, a district trying to raise the proportion it spends in classrooms could raise salaries for teachers, even ineffective ones. Such an approach isn’t necessarily going to improve achievement, it adds.

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.
Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Billions for Schools Are in Limbo as Trump Admin. Denies State Funding Requests
Chaos and confusion continue to reign as states scramble to spend the last of their COVID relief funds under new deadlines.
8 min read
Illustration of a man pushing half of clock and half of a money coin forward on a red arrow
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Education Funding The Big Questions About Trump's K-12 Budget Proposal, Answered
Trump is proposing to cut billions of dollars in K-12 investments, consolidate grant programs, and potentially rejigger special education law.
13 min read
An aerial view of a maze made up of 100 dollar bills with two clay figures. One looks like Trump with blond hair and in a blue suit with a red tie and he's waving to another white business man in a suit walking away from him.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Trump Asks Congress to Slash Billions in Education Funding—and 'Preserve' Title I
A White House budget proposal calls for consolidating grants, eliminating key funding streams, and ramping up charter school investments.
8 min read
Vector illustration of business persons tightening the purse/finances.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Trump's Spending Plans Are Late—Raising Worries About K-12 Funds
The executive branch has three opportunities in the near future to detail its education funding priorities in writing—but it hasn't yet.
10 min read
Image of a dollar bill with the Capitol in the center.
DigitalVision Vectors