Federal Reporter's Notebook

Spellings: English-Learners Need More Help

By Mary Ann Zehr — December 06, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The nation needs to “pick up the pace” in helping English-language learners do well in school, Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings said last week in a speech at a conference here for teachers and administrators who work with such students.

“English-language learners are the fastest-growing student population in the United States,” Ms. Spellings told the 1,200 attendees at a luncheon during the Education Department-sponsored conference, held Nov. 30 through Dec. 2.

She noted that by 2025, one in four students in U.S. classrooms is expected to be an English-language learner. “Our education system is in a race to keep up with these students. We have to pick up the pace,” she said.

The secretary reiterated the goal of the federal No Child Left Behind Act that “we will close the achievement gap by 2014.” She said that the implementation of high standards and accountability called for in the law are paying off in advancing that goal.

Ms. Spellings said that many reading strategies that have been found to work with children in general also work for English-language learners. But she added that more research needs to be done on how best to teach such students.

“We haven’t fully cracked the code for English-language learners,” she said. “We need to develop a more focused, research-based strategy for these students—and we better do it soon.”

Educators said in interviews between sessions that the No Child Left Behind Act, which will be 4 years old next month, is not realistic in some of its requirements for English-language learners, such as the mandate that the achievement gap between students who are learning English and other students be closed completely.

“As long as you continue to get large groups of immigrants at the lowest proficiency level, the scores won’t make the leaps to close the gaps,” said Carol Bass, the supervisor of programs for English-language learners for the 66,000-student Prince William County, Va., school system.

But educators also said that the law has given them more power within their school districts to improve education for English-language learners.

Estee Lopez, the director of English-language learners and instructional services for the 12,000-student New Rochelle, N.Y., district, said she opposes the federal law’s requirement that English-language learners take state standardized tests in English, rather than in their native languages, three years after they enroll in U.S. schools.

It’s not fair, she said, for schools to be penalized if the test scores for such students prevent the schools from meeting the goals for adequate yearly progress that states have set to comply with the law.

“The research tells us it takes five to seven years for an English-language learner to be able to compete somewhat effectively with a native speaker of English,” Ms. Lopez said.

At the same time, she said, the law has spurred improvements in her state, such as the development of standards for English-language learners and creation of better assessments, such as a new test for measuring English proficiency, that help educators better determine how such students are progressing.

Jesus DeLeon, the director of federal projects for the Caldwell, Idaho, school district, said that the NCLB law has had an overall positive affect on the English-language learners in his district.

“Not only are they getting more attention, but they are getting better instruction,” he said. Nearly 1,000 of the district’s 5,800 students are English-language learners.

“While it should have happened all along,” Mr. DeLeon said, the district’s administrators are now placing a high priority on training regular classroom teachers—not just teachers of English as a second language—on the best ways to work with English-language learners.

Kathleen Leos, the director of the Education Department’s office of English-language acquisition, which sponsored the conference, said federal officials are considering making a change in only one of the law’s requirements affecting English-language learners.

She wouldn’t speculate on what the change would be or when it would be announced, except to say that it would affect only students who are recent arrivals to the United States.

English-language learners must take their states’ standardized mathematics tests—in English or their native languages—during their first year in the country, but they have the option of taking an English-proficiency test instead of a standardized state reading test during that first year. Test scores for newcomers aren’t counted in the federal accountability system, however, until students have been in the United States for at least a year.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Webinar
Reflections on Evidence-Based Grading Practices: What We Learned for Next Year
Get real insights on evidence-based grading from K-12 leaders.
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
3 Key Strategies for Prepping for State Tests & Building Long-Term Formative Practices
Boost state test success with data-driven strategies. Join our webinar for actionable steps, collaboration tips & funding insights.
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Opinion Federal Ed. Research Has Been Slashed. Here’s What We All Lose
The long-term costs to our students far outstrip any short-term taxpayer savings from the Trump cuts.
Stephen H. Davis
4 min read
Person sitting alone on hill looking at the horizon feeling sad, resting head in hand. Mourning the loss of education research data.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + iStock/Getty Images
Federal Trump Says RFK Jr. Will Oversee Special Education, Child Nutrition
Advocates are wary as the president's comments don't specify when or how the transition will happen.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., speaks before Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump at a campaign event, Sept. 27, 2024 in Walker, Mich.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., speaks a campaign event for then candidate Donald Trump on Sept. 27, 2024 in Walker, Mich. President Trump has announced that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, now led by Kennedy, would handle “special needs and all of the nutrition programs and everything else.”
Carlos Osorio/AP
Federal Trump Order Tells Linda McMahon to 'Facilitate' Education Department's Closure
An executive order the president signed Thursday directs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to prepare the 45-year-old agency for shutdown.
4 min read
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
Ben Curtis/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Cuts Library Funding. What It Means for Students
In an executive order last week, the Trump administration mandated the reduction of seven agencies, including one that funds libraries around the country: the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).
5 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House, Monday, Feb. 10, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House, Monday, Feb. 10, 2025, in Washington.
Alex Brandon/AP