School Choice & Charters

Senate Still Wrangling Over D.C. Voucher Plan

By Erik W. Robelen — October 01, 2003 4 min read

After intermittent floor debate and a failed bid to craft a bipartisan compromise last week, the Senate postponed an up-or-down vote on legislation to provide private school vouchers for students in the District of Columbia.

With many Senate Democrats determined to stop the proposed five-year pilot program of “opportunity scholarships” for children from low-income families, two Democratic senators who had been straddling the fence on the bill had put forward a compromise plan as the measure came to the floor of the Republican- controlled chamber in midweek.

But after it became clear on Sept. 25 that the proposal by Sens. Thomas R. Carper, D-Del., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., was a no-go, senators returned to the floor and approved a less stringent amendment put forward by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. Debate was slated to continue late last week, but no further votes on the measure were expected until early the week of Sept. 29.

With Washington Mayor Anthony A. Williams at her side on the Senate floor, Sen. Feinstein—one of a small band of congressional Democrats to unequivocally back vouchers for the capital city—urged her fellow lawmakers to back the plan.

“I want everybody to know this is your request and your program,” she said to the Democratic mayor, who has come under strong criticism from other city politicians for backing the pilot voucher plan. “I don’t know how many votes on our side of the aisle we will have for it, but I think it is a very important program to try.”

Ms. Feinstein’s amendment, approved by voice vote, would require that recipients of private school vouchers take the same standardized tests as their public school peers, and that teachers in participating schools have college degrees. It also would require an independent evaluation of the program within nine months, according to a spokesman for the senator.

‘Balanced Approach’

Sen. Feinstein’s amendment did not go as far as one proposed earlier in the week by Sens. Carper and Landrieu. That plan called for subjecting private schools that accepted voucher students to the same testing, teacher-credentialing, and other accountability measures that Washington’s public schools are required to meet under the No Child Left Behind Act.

The plan also would have limited the vouchers to students in public schools identified for “improvement” under the federal education law, and would have ended the program in three years if voucher recipients had failed to meet the law’s criteria for adequate yearly progress. In addition, the two senators wanted a promise that the new language would be retained when the House and the Senate negotiated a final voucher program.

“Before we use taxpayer dollars to fund a private school scholarship program, we need to make sure that what we’re doing will raise student achievement and secure quality results,” Sen. Carper said in a statement announcing the proposal on Sept. 24.

Aides to Sens. Carper and Landrieu said that their proposal had been rejected by the White House and the Senate Republican leadership.

“When we try to make the scholarship program accountable to the same standards of No Child Left Behind, the White House and Republicans run from that,” said Bill Ghent, a spokesman for Sen. Carper.

A call seeking comment from the office of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., had not been returned by press time.

The voucher plan is part of a broad funding bill for the District of Columbia that had cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee early last month. The measure would provide vouchers of up to $7,500 a year for tuition at private schools, including religious ones, with priority given to students in persistently low-performing schools.

In introducing the bill on the floor Sept. 24, Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, stressed that it allotted $40 million in new money for “three sectors” of schooling in the nation’s capital: $13 million for the regular public schools, $13 million for charter schools, and $1 million for administrative expenses, in addition to $13 million for the voucher program.

“This is a balanced approach,” Sen. DeWine said. "[T]he most important supporters for this program are the thousands of low-income parents of schoolchildren in this city whose children are languishing in failing schools. These parents want an opportunity to try a new approach. I believe they deserve that opportunity.”

Senate Minority Leader Thomas A. Daschle, D-S.D., described the plan very differently, as he vowed last week to press his members to oppose the bill.

“It’s an unfortunate loss of revenue for our public school system, it sets a double standard with regard to the No Child Left Behind Act, and I think it sends a message to the rest of the country that somehow Congress is more supportive of vouchers, which couldn’t be further from the truth,” he said.

Republicans hold just 51 Senate seats to the Democrats’ 48, plus one Independent who typically votes with the Democrats. Thus, GOP senators would need to attract support from the other side of the aisle to reach the 60 votes necessary to cut off a filibuster, should the Democrats decide to mount one.

Currently, Wisconsin operates a voucher program in Milwaukee, as does Ohio in Cleveland. Florida runs voucher programs both for students with disabilities statewide and for students from failing public schools, while a new Colorado voucher program is slated to get going next fall.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Classroom Technology Webinar
Here to Stay – Pandemic Lessons for EdTech in Future Development
What technology is needed in a post pandemic district? Learn how changes in education will impact development of new technologies.
Content provided by AWS
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Strategies & Tips for Complex Decision-Making
Schools are working through the most disruptive period in the history of modern education, facing a pandemic, economic problems, social justice issues, and rapid technological change all at once. But even after the pandemic ends,

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Choice & Charters Opinion Is Hybrid Home Schooling the Future of Education?
Rick Hess speaks with Mike McShane about hybrid home schooling, which combines the best of home schooling and traditional schooling.
7 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School Choice & Charters Oklahoma Charter Schools Granted Local Tax Revenue in 'Seismic' Settlement
A groundbreaking settlement will fundamentally change the way charter schools are funded in Oklahoma, despite vehement opposition.
Nuria Martinez-Keel, The Oklahoman
3 min read
This July 19, 2019 photo shows an Epic Charter Schools office in Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma State Board of Education voted Thursday in favor of an agreement with the state's public charter school association to settle a 2017 lawsuit.
This July 19, 2019 photo shows an Epic Charter Schools office in Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma State Board of Education voted Thursday in favor of an agreement with the state's public charter school association to settle a 2017 lawsuit.
Sue Ogrocki/AP
School Choice & Charters COVID-19 May Energize Push for School Choice in States. Where That Leads Is Unclear
The pandemic is driving legislators' interest in mechanisms like education savings accounts, but the growth may not be straightforward.
8 min read
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds delivers her Condition of the State address before a joint session of the Iowa Legislature on Jan. 12 at the statehouse in Des Moines, Iowa.
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds delivers her Condition of the State address to state lawmakers on Jan. 12. She's pushing a major school choice expansion.
Bryon Houlgrave/The Des Moines Register via AP
School Choice & Charters Letter to the Editor Are NOLA Charters a Mixed Bag?
To the Editor:
The opinion essay by Douglas N. Harris about how New Orleans’ education reforms post-Katrina are relevant to the COVID-19 era (“As Schools Recover After COVID-19, Look to New Orleans,” Sept. 30, 2020) highlights some basic improvements in the NOLA system but downplays the most significant aspects of those changes: the impact on people of color.
1 min read