Law & Courts

Ruling Sparks Row Over Ohio Construction Panel

By Rhea R. Borja — June 19, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Ohio Gov. Bob Taft last week ordered the state’s school construction commission to better manage itself and open its contract-review process.

His recommendations came after a county judge ruled that Randall A. Fischer, the commission’s executive director, acted without authority in awarding $2 billion in construction contracts over the past five years.

The ruling sent tremors through the state. One lawmaker has called for Mr. Fischer’s dismissal. Meanwhile, the Democratic candidate for governor joined a state union leader in urging him to step down for blocking payments of union- scale wages on school construction projects.

Gov. Taft, a Republican, said he supported Mr. Fischer, but agreed that the three-member commissionnot just Mr. Fischershould approve school construction projects. The governor also requested that the commission adopt new management rules and retroactively vote on the 1,800 contracts approved by Mr. Fischer.

“While I question the validity of the recent court opinion ... I ask that the commission undertake immediate changes that will provide more direct oversight and approval of commission projects,” he said in a June 11 statement.

In May, Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Jennifer L. Brunner stated in a biting, 68-page ruling that the state’s competitive bid process was a “sham.”

“The public education of the state’s children, an essential government function, is threatened by the unbridled discretion unlawfully placed in the hands of one person, Randall Fischer. This is unconscionable,” she wrote.

Her ruling could mean that many building projects could be subject to lawsuits, some observers say, and throw Gov. Taft’s much-heralded $23 billion school construction program off track.

The issue has political overtones, some observers note. Not only do the calls for Mr. Fischer’s dismissal come from Democrats, but Judge Brunner is an elected Democrat who represented a former Democratic gubernatorial candidate in a 1998 complaint to the state election commission.

Meanwhile, the Ohio Court of Appeals issued a stay of Judge Brunner’s decision pending the outcome of an appeal by the state attorney general.

Mr. Fischer said that he was surprised by Judge Brunner’s ruling and that the school facilities commission had passed two resolutions granting him the authority to approve contracts. He has approved projects in 73 of the state’s 612 school districts.

As the three- member commission meets quarterly, it does not have the time to review and vote on each contract, said Mr. Fischer, who took office with the commission’s creation in 1997. He added, “Nobody’s making accusations that this money is being misspent or being misappropriated. The question is about the process. That’s why the governor and key legislators are standing behind me.”

Construction Delays

Judge Brunner’s decision stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the Cincinnati-based Monarch Construction Co. against the 800- student Tri-Village school district in western Ohio. Monarch filed suit this spring after its bid for a $6.1 million contract to renovate the system’s K-12 school was rejected by the school board despite being the lowest one submitted.

Instead, the board chose Wapakoneta-based Peterson Construction Co., which submitted a bid that was more than $133,000 higher than Monarch’s. The state facilities commission supported the local school board’s decision on the project, which is being partially funded by the state.

If the appeals court had not granted a stay, Tri-Village would have been forced to award the contract to Monarch or rebid the project. Either option would have delayed the school’s renovation, says Jack Rosati Jr., the lawyer for Tri-Village. Now construction by Peterson will go forward. The renovated school is slated to open in August 2003. “We have 400 elementary kids going to school in a 1920s building designed for 200,” Mr. Rosati said.

Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery sought the stay, arguing that “the ones who are most harmed by the delay imposed by the trial court’s decision are Ohio’s schoolchildren.”

A version of this article appeared in the June 19, 2002 edition of Education Week as Ruling Sparks Row Over Ohio Construction Panel

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
AI in Schools: What 1,000 Districts Reveal About Readiness and Risk
Move beyond “ban vs. embrace” with real-world AI data and practical guidance for a balanced, responsible district policy.
Content provided by Securly
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
K-12 Lens 2026: What New Staffing Data Reveals About District Operations
Explore national survey findings and hear how districts are navigating staffing changes that affect daily operations, workload, and planning.
Content provided by Frontline Education
Education Funding Webinar Congress Approved Next Year’s Federal School Funding. What’s Next?
Congress passed the budget, but uncertainty remains. Experts explain what districts should expect from federal education policy next.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court’s Gender Identity Ruling Leaves Schools Seeking Clarity
Advocates say they would welcome more from the Supreme Court on gender-notification policies.
7 min read
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington.
The Supreme Court is photographed, Friday, Feb. 27, 2026, in Washington. The high court recently ruled that California policies that sometimes limit or discourage schools from disclosing information to parents about children’s gender transitions and expressions at school likely violate parents’ constitutional rights
Rahmat Gul/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Backs Parents in School Gender Disclosure Fight
The Supreme Court restored an injunction blocking California policies on student gender transitions
8 min read
Teacher’s aide Amelia Mester, wrapped in a Pride flag, urges Escondido Union High School District not to have employees notify parents if they believe a student may be transgender in November 2025. A policy on the issue in the city’s elementary school district is the subject of a federal class-action lawsuit in which a judge just sided against the district.
Teacher’s aide Amelia Mester, wrapped in a Pride flag, urges Escondido Union High School District not to have employees notify parents if they believe a student may be transgender at a meeting in November 2025. Two parents and two teachers from the district sued in 2023, challenging California state guidance concerning student gender transitions and parental notification. The U.S. Supreme Court has now reinstated a lower-court decision overturning those state policies.
Charlie Neuman for The San Diego Union-Tribune/TNS
Law & Courts Appeals Court Allows Louisiana Ten Commandments Displays to Proceed
The court said it was premature to rule on the constitutionality of La. Ten Commandments displays.
3 min read
Students work under Ten Commandments and Bill of Rights posters on display in a classroom at Lehman High School in Kyle, Texas, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025.
Students work under Ten Commandments and Bill of Rights posters on display in a classroom at Lehman High School in Kyle, Texas, Oct. 16, 2025. A federal appeals court has lifted a lower-court injunction blocking a Louisiana law that requires Ten Commandments displays, clearing the way for the law to take effect.
Eric Gay/AP
Law & Courts Social Media Companies Face Legal Reckoning Over Mental Health Harms to Children
Some of the biggest players from Meta to TikTok are getting a chance to make their case in courtrooms around the country.
6 min read
Social Media Kids Trial 26050035983057
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg leaves court after testifying in a landmark trial over whether social media platforms deliberately addict and harm children, on Feb. 18, 2026, in Los Angeles.
AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes