Law & Courts

Ruling Sparks Row Over Ohio Construction Panel

By Rhea R. Borja — June 19, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Ohio Gov. Bob Taft last week ordered the state’s school construction commission to better manage itself and open its contract-review process.

His recommendations came after a county judge ruled that Randall A. Fischer, the commission’s executive director, acted without authority in awarding $2 billion in construction contracts over the past five years.

The ruling sent tremors through the state. One lawmaker has called for Mr. Fischer’s dismissal. Meanwhile, the Democratic candidate for governor joined a state union leader in urging him to step down for blocking payments of union- scale wages on school construction projects.

Gov. Taft, a Republican, said he supported Mr. Fischer, but agreed that the three-member commissionnot just Mr. Fischershould approve school construction projects. The governor also requested that the commission adopt new management rules and retroactively vote on the 1,800 contracts approved by Mr. Fischer.

“While I question the validity of the recent court opinion ... I ask that the commission undertake immediate changes that will provide more direct oversight and approval of commission projects,” he said in a June 11 statement.

In May, Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Jennifer L. Brunner stated in a biting, 68-page ruling that the state’s competitive bid process was a “sham.”

“The public education of the state’s children, an essential government function, is threatened by the unbridled discretion unlawfully placed in the hands of one person, Randall Fischer. This is unconscionable,” she wrote.

Her ruling could mean that many building projects could be subject to lawsuits, some observers say, and throw Gov. Taft’s much-heralded $23 billion school construction program off track.

The issue has political overtones, some observers note. Not only do the calls for Mr. Fischer’s dismissal come from Democrats, but Judge Brunner is an elected Democrat who represented a former Democratic gubernatorial candidate in a 1998 complaint to the state election commission.

Meanwhile, the Ohio Court of Appeals issued a stay of Judge Brunner’s decision pending the outcome of an appeal by the state attorney general.

Mr. Fischer said that he was surprised by Judge Brunner’s ruling and that the school facilities commission had passed two resolutions granting him the authority to approve contracts. He has approved projects in 73 of the state’s 612 school districts.

As the three- member commission meets quarterly, it does not have the time to review and vote on each contract, said Mr. Fischer, who took office with the commission’s creation in 1997. He added, “Nobody’s making accusations that this money is being misspent or being misappropriated. The question is about the process. That’s why the governor and key legislators are standing behind me.”

Construction Delays

Judge Brunner’s decision stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the Cincinnati-based Monarch Construction Co. against the 800- student Tri-Village school district in western Ohio. Monarch filed suit this spring after its bid for a $6.1 million contract to renovate the system’s K-12 school was rejected by the school board despite being the lowest one submitted.

Instead, the board chose Wapakoneta-based Peterson Construction Co., which submitted a bid that was more than $133,000 higher than Monarch’s. The state facilities commission supported the local school board’s decision on the project, which is being partially funded by the state.

If the appeals court had not granted a stay, Tri-Village would have been forced to award the contract to Monarch or rebid the project. Either option would have delayed the school’s renovation, says Jack Rosati Jr., the lawyer for Tri-Village. Now construction by Peterson will go forward. The renovated school is slated to open in August 2003. “We have 400 elementary kids going to school in a 1920s building designed for 200,” Mr. Rosati said.

Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery sought the stay, arguing that “the ones who are most harmed by the delay imposed by the trial court’s decision are Ohio’s schoolchildren.”

A version of this article appeared in the June 19, 2002 edition of Education Week as Ruling Sparks Row Over Ohio Construction Panel

Events

Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Modernizing Principal Support: The Road to More Connected and Effective Leaders
When principals are better equipped to lead, support, and maintain high levels of teaching and learning, outcomes for students are improved.
Content provided by BetterLesson

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Conservatives’ Checklist: U.S. Supreme Court Education Decisions to Overrule
Here are five education issues that could be targets for reconsideration if Roe v. Wade falls.
3 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, Dec. 3, 2021. The Supreme Court has turned away a plea from parents to block a new admissions policy at a prestigious high school in northern Virginia that a lower court had found discriminates against Asian American students.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 3, 2021.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts Leaked Abortion Draft Has Supreme Court Education Cases in Political Cross-Hairs
Conservatives have taken aim at decisions on educating immigrants, race in admissions, and religion. Liberals have some cases in mind, too.
8 min read
supreme court SOC
Getty
Law & Courts 'Brown v. Board' Cited in Draft Supreme Court Opinion to Back Overturning Abortion Rights
The leaked opinion in a case still to be decided by the Supreme Court cites landmark decisions including Brown v. Board of Education.
7 min read
A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Monday night, May 2, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion circulated among Supreme Court justices suggests that earlier this year a majority of them had thrown support behind overturning the 1973 case Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a report published Monday night in Politico. It's unclear if the draft represents the court's final word on the matter. The Associated Press could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the draft Politico posted, which if verified marks a shocking revelation of the high court's secretive deliberation process, particularly before a case is formally decided.
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court Monday night after the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the court intends to overturn the 1973 <i>Roe v. Wade</i> precedent that legalized abortion nationwide.
Alex Brandon/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Rules Against Some 'Emotional Distress' Claims. What It Means for Schools
The dissenters say the decision means students cannot recover damages for the emotional harms of race, sex, or disability bias.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
iStock/Getty