School Choice & Charters

Revived D.C. Voucher Plan Added to Spending Bill

By Caroline Hendrie — November 26, 2003 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

After weeks in legislative limbo, a plan to provide federally financed, $7,500 tuition vouchers for children in the District of Columbia appeared late last week to be headed for passage in Congress.

A priority for Republicans but anathema to many Democrats, the program was rolled in to a huge, multipart spending measure that Republican leaders were expected to present for adoption in the House and Senate by early this week. Congress was working on a flurry of legislation last week in the hope of adjourning for the year by Thanksgiving.

If enacted, the program would be the first to provide private school vouchers paid for with federal funds.

The voucher initiative has been the focus of intense, largely partisan debate, both as to its substance and to the parliamentary tactics employed to advance and impede its passage.

That maneuvering continued last week. First, Senate leaders sidestepped a Democratic filibuster by stripping the voucher component from a broader spending bill for the capital city. Then, House and Senate conferees slipped the plan back into an omnibus, $285 billion spending measure that included the District of Columbia appropriations bill.

That chain of events, which meant that the $13 million voucher initiative had been approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee but never brought to a vote on the Senate floor, led voucher opponents to cry foul. A similar outcry ensued after the House passed a $10 million voucher plan in early September by a one-vote margin.

“Basically, they did something in the dark that they couldn’t do in the light,” said Merwyn L. Scott, a lobbyist for the National Education Association, which strongly opposes vouchers. “We’re very upset.”

But Republicans, who hold majorities in both chambers, defended their tactics. Among them was Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn. “I believe, very passionately, that providing 2,000 low-income children in D.C. a better education is the moral imperative of this body,” he said.

Voucher supporters also called opponents disingenuous for sending out a flurry of press statements claiming victory after the program was taken out of the District of Columbia spending measure that passed the Senate on Nov. 18. Besides the NEA, those anti-voucher groups included the National School Boards Association, the National PTA, and People For the American Way, a Washington-based liberal advocacy group.

Three-Pronged Package

Members of a House-Senate conference committee, which was convened to resolve differences between spending measures in the two chambers, agreed on Nov. 19 on a voucher program similar to the Senate version.

The conferees’ plan would earmark $13 million to provide low-income families in Washington with vouchers worth as much as $7,500 annually to pay tuition at religious or secular private schools. Priority would go to children in public schools defined as low-performing under the No Child Left Behind Act.

Pupils receiving vouchers would have to take tests given to students in the city’s public schools, and the initiative would be independently evaluated after five years, according to Senate aides familiar with the plan. The program would be administered under terms of a memorandum of understanding between the federal Department of Education and Mayor Anthony A. Williams of Washington, a Democrat.

The voucher money, as well as $1 million for its administration, would be part of a three-pronged, $40 million package that would provide $26 million in extra funding evenly divided between the city’s regular public school system and its 38 charter schools.

Pursuing strategies they have followed for months, opponents of the District of Columbia initiative last week stressed its national significance, while supporters continued to portray the program as Congress’ response to a local need. City politicians have been divided over the plan, with the mayor and the school board president behind it, but other school board members and much of the District of Columbia Council against it.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Choice & Charters Virtual Charters in Hot Water Again. Accusations of Fraud Prompt $150M Lawsuit
Indiana officials seek to recoup more than $150 million they say was either wrongly obtained or misspent by a consortium of virtual schools.
Arika Herron, The Indianapolis Star
2 min read
Indiana's attorney general Todd Rokita speaks at a news conference on Sept. 16, 2020, in Indianapolis. Rokita filed a lawsuit against a group of online charter schools accused of defrauding the state out of millions of dollars Thursday, July 8, 2021.
Indiana's attorney general Todd Rokita speaks at a news conference on Sept. 16, 2020, in Indianapolis.
Darron Cummings/AP
School Choice & Charters How the Pandemic Helped Fuel the Private School Choice Movement
State lawmakers got a new talking point as they pushed to create and expand programs to send students to private schools.
8 min read
Collage showing two boys in classroom during pandemic wearing masks with cropped photo of feet and arrows going in different directions.
Collage by Gina Tomko/EducationWeek (Images: Getty)
School Choice & Charters Opinion Taking Stock After 30 Years of Charter Schools
Rick Hess speaks with Nina Rees, president and CEO of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, on charter schools turning 30.
8 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School Choice & Charters In Fight Over Millions of Dollars for Charter Schools, a Marijuana Tax May Bring Peace
The Oklahoma State Board of Education voted unanimously to rescind a polarizing lawsuit settlement, pending certain stipulations.
Nuria Martinez-Keel, The Oklahoman
3 min read
Money bills cash funds close up Getty
Getty