Opinion
Education Funding Letter to the Editor

School Finance Remedies Must Also Include Reform

August 11, 2009 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Michael A. Rebell and Bruce D. Baker’s online Commentary “Assessing ‘Success’ in School Finance Litigations” (July 8, 2009) grasps at straws to justify unsuccessful court interventions of the past.

Our book, Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses: Solving the Funding-Achievement Puzzle in America’s Public Schools, shows imperceptible differences in student-performance trends in states with large court-ordered funding increases to achieve “adequacy” (Kentucky, New Jersey, and Wyoming) compared to the nation as a whole over the 1992-2007 period. Only when there were also substantial policy changes beyond funding (Massachusetts) were there significant gains.

Using different time periods for their analysis, Messrs. Rebell and Baker dispute our findings. Their principal point is that, using available test scores from the National Assessment of Educational Progress and a starting date of 1996 (math) or 1998 (reading), 12 of 13 test-score increases for all students and nine of 13 increases for economically disadvantaged students in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Wyoming were higher than the increases nationally.

Using data on the NAEP Web site for their selected time periods, however, we find that only 10 of 13 increases for all students and eight of 13 increases for free-lunch students actually beat the national average. In other words, slightly more than half the observations for economically disadvantaged kids are favorable, a result close to chance.

But this is only part of the story. Messrs. Rebell and Baker fail to mention that these “favorable” results are dominated by Massachusetts, confirming one of the important conclusions made in our book about the need for basic reforms. They also ignore the fact that just three of eight available comparisons for black students are favorable.

Perhaps most important, the court remedies in Kentucky, New Jersey, and Wyoming resulted in average gains for all students relative to the nation of less than 0.05 standard deviations, a rather minor improvement given the billions of dollars spent. To put this in context, an increase of this size would move somebody at the middle of the national distribution from the 50th to the 52nd percentile. When the test scores of the principal targets of court remedies—poor and minority students—are considered, even these small effects disappear.

In short, as amplified in our book, court-mandated funding has induced dramatic spending increases in a number of states with little to show in the way of improved student outcomes. Only when the remedies include fundamental reform, such as occurred in Massachusetts, do we see signs of success.

Eric A. Hanushek

Senior Fellow

Hoover Institution

Stanford University

Stanford, Calif.

Alfred A. Lindseth

Of Counsel

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

Atlanta, Ga.

A version of this article appeared in the August 12, 2009 edition of Education Week as School Finance Remedies Must Also Include Reform

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
The Future of the Science of Reading
Join us for a discussion on the future of the Science of Reading and how to support every student’s path to literacy.
Content provided by HMH
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math
Student Well-Being Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: The Power of Emotion Regulation to Drive K-12 Academic Performance and Wellbeing
Wish you could handle emotions better? Learn practical strategies with researcher Marc Brackett and host Peter DeWitt.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Who Will Bear the Brunt of Trump's Hold on $6.8 Billion in School Funds?
The sudden absence of expected federal funds has already cost some educators their jobs.
12 min read
Image of a $100 dollar bill that is cut into blocks for distribution.
E+/Getty
Education Funding Schools and States Scramble as Trump Freezes $6.8 Billion in Federal Funds
After-school programs, English-learner services, migrant education programs, and professional development are all at risk.
8 min read
President Donald Trump speaks to the media before walking across the South Lawn of the White House to board Marine One en route to Joint Base Andrews, Md., and on to Florida, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump speaks to the media before walking across the South Lawn of the White House to board Marine One on Tuesday, July 1, 2025. Trump's administration has told states it's holding back nearly $7 billion in already-approved federal funds for schools, sending states and schools scrambling for more information.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Education Funding Interactive See How Much School Funding Trump Is Holding Back From Your State
The administration is holding back nearly $7 billion for English learners, after-school programs, professional development, and more.
1 min read
Image of money symbol made of sand filtering slowly through an hour glass.
DigitalVision Vectors
Education Funding Trump Tells States He's Holding Back $6.8 Billion for Schools
Schools nationwide won't see funding earmarked for English learners, migrant students, professional development, and more.
4 min read
063025 Trump AP BS
President Donald Trump walks to an event in the East Room of the White House on June 26, 2025. On June 30, his administration informed state education departments it won't send out nearly $6.8 billion in education funding on July 1 as required by law.
Mark Shiefelbein/AP