School Choice & Charters

Ohio Poised to Reorganize Charter School Oversight

By Caroline Hendrie — December 11, 2002 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

After a bitter fight in a state that has become a major battleground in the national debate over charter schools, the Ohio legislature adopted far-reaching changes last week in the ground rules for how the independent public schools operate.

House Bill 364, which Gov. Bob Taft, a Republican, is expected to sign, would carve out an unusual new role for state education officials in overseeing Ohio’s fast-growing charter school sector. As for charter schools, the bill would ease some restrictions—such as a rule limiting them from borrowing money for more than a year—while imposing a raft of new regulations on matters ranging from remedial education to Internet filtering.

The votes marked the end of a protracted battle in a fierce political and legal war over charter schools in Ohio. Lawmakers acted while a state trial judge is considering arguments in a 2001 lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Ohio’s 5-year- old charter law. The suit was filed by a coalition led by the Ohio Federation of Teachers, the Ohio Schools Boards Association, and the state chapter of the PTA.

Rewritten a dozen times this year, the bill approved by both chambers of the Republican-controlled legislature deals with a range of issues that have been fodder for an anti-charter campaign spearheaded by the OFT this fall. Those issues include the role of for-profit education management companies, computer-based “e-schools,” and the oversight of Ohio’s 127 charter schools. (“Ohio Charters Targeted in Election Politics,” Sept. 18, 2002.)

Rep. Jon A. Husted, the Republican who sponsored the bill, called it proof that policymakers are addressing shortcomings of the original 1997 law that led to abuses. Representatives of the state’s charter schools echoed his praise.

“A majority of charter schools in the state are doing what I feel is a good job of providing choice, but we have had a handful of disreputable operators that have tarnished the good work that has been done,” Mr. Husted said.

Leaders of the coalition trying to overturn Ohio’s charter law said in a statement last week that the group’s goal was “to reform, not abolish, charter schools.” Yet they deplored the passage of the legislation, which they had lobbied hard to defeat.

“The bill does little to rein in the abuses we’ve seen ... and creates new opportunities for mischief,"said Tom Mooney, the coalition’s chairman and the OFT president.

Audit Spurs Changes

The final compromise, which was approved by the Senate 19-12 on Dec. 4 and by the House 56-41 the next day, incorporates recommendations from a state audit released last winter that sharply criticized lapses in charter school oversight. (“Audit Spurs Drive to Revamp Ohio’s Charter School System,” Feb. 27, 2002.)

Chief among those changes would be a shift in who can grant charters.

The bill would add a new layer to the process of chartering schools: It would remove the authority of the state board of education to grant charters. Instead, the legislation would put the state department of education in charge of approving nonprofit groups that in turn could charter schools.

Charter experts say such an arrangement, which effectively would turn the state education agency into an authorizer of authorizers, stands apart from systems in other states because the power to issue charters is usually granted by state law.

“This is something that is going to be watched very closely around the country,” said Jon Schroeder, the director of the Charter Friends National Network, a nonprofit group based in St. Paul, Minn.

Under the bill, nonprofit organizations wishing to sponsor charter schools would need to be education-oriented, have $500,000 in assets, and have been operating for at least five years. Until July 2005, those groups would be limited to sponsoring existing schools. After that point, they could charter new schools, and the existing statewide cap of 225 start-up charter schools would be lifted.

Existing schools authorized by the state board would have two years to find new sponsors.

In addition to letting nonprofit groups seek chartering authority, the bill would allow the state’s 13 four- year public universities and its 58 county or multicounty “educational service centers” to grant charters. Currently, only the University of Toledo and the Lucas County Educational Service Center in Toledo have that power, along with the state board and local school districts.

Supporters argue that the changes would free state officials from directly overseeing schools, allowing them to focus on supervising charter authorizers and providing technical assistance.

Members of the coalition fighting the state in court contend that local school boards should be given exclusive authority to grant charters, on the grounds that those board members are directly accountable to local voters.

The measure also would ease the geographic restrictions on charter schools. Currently, new charter schools may open in 21 urban districts, as well as other districts that the state considers to be in “academic emergency,” the lowest of five categories under Ohio’s accountability system.

Districts in the second-lowest category, “academic watch,” would also be fair game for new charter schools under HB 364.

Fifty of Ohio’s 600-plus school districts fell into one of those two categories this year.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 11, 2002 edition of Education Week as Ohio Poised to Reorganize Charter School Oversight

Events

Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Innovative Approaches to Special Education
Join this free virtual event to explore innovations in the evolving landscape of special education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
STEM Fusion: Empowering K-12 Education through Interdisciplinary Integration
Join our webinar to learn how integrating STEM with other subjects can revolutionize K-12 education & prepare students for the future.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
School & District Management Webinar How Pensions Work: Why It Matters for K-12 Education
Panelists explain the fundamentals of teacher pension finances — how they are paid for, what drives their costs, and their impact on K-12 education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Choice & Charters Video Private School Choice: A Video Explainer
We're tracking the proliferation of school choice policies around the country. Here's how to get up to speed.
2 min read
School Choice & Charters Opinion What Would Religious Charter Schools Mean for Public Education?
Discriminating and proselytizing on the taxpayer dime will never be acceptable, writes Kevin G. Welner.
Kevin G. Welner
5 min read
A green apple with a cross shaped stem in between red apples.
Richard Mia for Education Week
School Choice & Charters Private School Choice Continues to Spread. 3 Things to Know
New research shows private schools increase tuition when states send public funds for parents to spend on private education.
6 min read
Image of private school kids outside in the school yard.
E+
School Choice & Charters Opinion Does School Choice 'Work'?
Ultimately, the “how” of educational choice may matter more than the “what.”
10 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty