Education Funding

Ohio Justices Set to Revisit Funding Case

By Alan Richard — November 14, 2001 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The state supreme court has agreed to reconsider its recent ruling that required the state to spend billions of dollars more on public schools.

By a 4-3 vote announced on Nov. 2, the court granted a motion sought by Gov. Bob Taft, who had asked the justices to reconsider their third decision in DeRolph v. State of Ohio, which was made public Sept. 6.

On the one hand, the request by the Republican governor, who faces re-election next year, appears odd. After all, the court’s decision earlier this fall actually handed the state a limited victory, upholding Ohio’s school finance system after the high court had twice ruled the system was unconstitutional.

But the September ruling came with conditions that angered some state leaders.

In an effort to win the court’s blessing at last, the legislature agreed this year to raise state spending for schools by $1.4 billion over the next 24 months. But the court ordered the state to do more: spend another $1.2 billion over the next two years. (“School Finance System Upheld by Ohio Court,” Sept. 12, 2001.)

The plaintiffs, however, maintained that the ruling had let lawmakers off easy and ignored the previous rulings in the case.

Gov. Taft and some lawmakers, meanwhile, wondered how Ohio would pay for the court-ordered spending.

High Court’s Options

In arguing on behalf of the governor to reopen the Sept. 6 decision, state Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery contended that the economic fallout from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks against the United States would make it hard for Ohio to find billions more dollars for schools. The state also argued that the supreme court had erred in calculating how much the remedy might cost.

Last week, both sides awaited further word from the court.

Among the court’s options: review the case completely, let the ruling stand with some minor adjustments, or encourage the state and the plaintiffs to seek an out-of-court settlement.

William L. Phillis, the leader of the coalition that filed the school finance lawsuit, said last week that he hoped the court’s latest action would not allow the state to escape its responsibilities.

“We’re willing to talk, as long as the state speaks with one voice and all issues are placed on the table,” said Mr. Phillis, the executive director of the Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy in School Funding.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the November 14, 2001 edition of Education Week as Ohio Justices Set to Revisit Funding Case

Events

Teaching Profession K-12 Essentials Forum New Insights Into the Teaching Profession
Join this free virtual event to get exclusive insights from Education Week's State of Teaching project.
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
Mathematics K-12 Essentials Forum Helping Students Succeed in Math

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Principals Urge Ed. Department: Leave School Safety Funding Alone
Schools need access to funds for mental health professionals and other student services, say principals who've experienced school shootings.
5 min read
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon listens to members of the Principal Recovery Network during their annual meeting on June 9, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon listens to members of the Principal Recovery Network during their annual meeting on June 9, 2025, in Washington.
Courtesy of Allyssa Hynes/NASSP
Education Funding Trump Admin. Says California’s K-12 Funding Is at Risk. What Would It Mean?
Title I and IDEA funding could be caught up in the battle between the White House and the largest state, which is led by Democrats.
10 min read
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter during an event signing a bill blocking California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, in the East Room of the White House on June 12, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter during an event where he signed a resolution blocking California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035 in the East Room of the White House on June 12, 2025. Trump's administration has reportedly discussed halting "formula funds" to the state's education department.
Alex Brandon/AP
Education Funding The Trump Budget for K-12 Schools: 5 Key Takeaways
The administration wants to cut roughly $7 billion in annual K-12 funding. Much of it supports vulnerable students.
6 min read
A kindergarten student raises her hand in a dual-language immersion class.
A kindergarten student raises her hand in a dual-language immersion class. Among other changes, President Donald Trump's fiscal 2026 budget would end dedicated federal funding for supplemental services for English learners.
Allison Shelley for All4Ed
Education Funding Trump Wants to Cut More Than 40 Federal K-12 Programs. See Which Ones
The president's detailed budget, released Friday, proposes eliminating dozens of programs as part of a nearly $13 billion cut.
2 min read
Illustration of a budget sheet, pencil, and calculator.
Maxim Basinski/iStock/Getty