Law & Courts

N.J. District Settles Case On Race Bias

By Mark Walsh — November 26, 1997 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Washington

Heading off a looming showdown in the U.S. Supreme Court over affirmative action, the Piscataway, N.J., school board agreed late last week to settle a race-discrimination lawsuit filed by a white teacher laid off in favor of a black colleague.

In a move that caught many observers off guard, the Piscataway board voted 5-3 last Thursday to settle its dispute with Sharon Taxman, a white business education teacher who was laid off in 1989 so the district could retain Debra Williams, the only black teacher in the business education department at Piscataway High School.

The two teachers had equal seniority and similar qualifications, leading the board to choose Ms. Williams to maintain racial diversity in the business department.

The circumstances of the settlement were unusual. The school board had lost in lower federal courts, but had decided to appeal to the high court against the advice of some civil rights advocates.

Those advocates feared that the high court review could lead to a broad ruling scaling back affirmative action in employment.

Last week, it was announced that a coalition of civil rights groups under the banner of the Washington-based Black Leadership Forum agreed to pay more than two-thirds of the $433,500 settlement to Ms. Taxman.

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund was said to be a prime mover behind the settlement.

David B. Rubin, the district’s lawyer, said the civil rights coalition had discussed the possibility of contributing to a settlement ever since the Supreme Court agreed last June to review the case of Piscataway Township Board of Education v. Taxman (Case No. 96-679).

“It’s no secret that [civil rights groups] and a lot of other folks didn’t give us a lot of chance of winning in the Supreme Court,” Mr. Rubin said late last week. “Their concern was that if the decision came down against the school board, there was the chance that it could go well beyond” restricting affirmative action in employment.

Stephen E. Klausner, the lawyer for Ms. Taxman, said he first received a phone call about a possible settlement on Nov. 14.

“I was dumbfounded by the offer,” he said. Ms. Taxman has always wanted the matter to be closed and had stayed out of the national spotlight that has been focused on the case for several years.

But in discussing the board’s initial settlement, Ms. Taxman believed that the amount slated for legal fees was too little, Mr. Klausner said. The two sides continued talks until they reached the $433,500 figure.

Of that, $186,000 will go to Ms. Taxman, which represents a $144,000 back-pay award she won in the lower courts, plus interest. The rest goes for legal costs. Ms. Taxman was laid off for the 1989-90 school year, called back for a year when a teacher went on maternity leave, then laid off for another school year. She regained her job permanently in the 1992-93 school year and has worked in the 6,400-student district since then.

The layoff has provoked years of acrimony and bitterness between Ms. Taxman and the district, as well as between the white teacher and Ms. Williams.

The two teachers have adjoining classrooms at Piscataway High but rarely speak to each other. (“Layoff Case Is Personal in N.J. School,” Oct. 8, 1997.)

Ms. Williams, although not a party to the lawsuit, has said she was pained by the situation because it appeared she was retained by the district only because she was black.

According to the Newark Star-Ledger, Ms. Williams attended last week’s school board meeting and wept after the board approved the settlement.

For the Best

The lawyers for both sides said the settlement was in their clients’ best interests, although Mr. Rubin and Mr. Klausner appeared at least somewhat disappointed that they would not be arguing before the Supreme Court.

“It’s every lawyer’s dream to argue a case before the Supreme Court,” Mr. Rubin said. “But I’m very comfortable with what happened here.”

Mr. Klausner said, “I am not an advocate of any civil rights group or any anti-affirmative action group. I have a live flesh-and-blood client, and her wishes are all that counted.”

But some organizations that had filed friend-of-the-court briefs with the high court were disappointed that the case appeared to be over.

“We believe it indicates the desperation and weakness of pro-affirmative action groups,” said William H. Mellor 3rd, the president of the Washington-based Institute for Justice, which opposes affirmative action. “They know the law is against them. They sought to postpone the inevitable day of reckoning.”

Civil rights groups in the Black Leadership Forum could not be reached for comment late last week.

The high court was to hear arguments in the case on Jan. 14. Both sides said the court must agree to dismiss the appeal based on the settlement, but that action is likely to happen within the next few weeks.

It is not unheard of for Supreme Court litigants to settle a case shortly before the justices are to hear arguments.

Winding Legal Path

The Piscataway board was seeking to reverse rulings in lower federal courts that the district’s decision to use race as the basis for laying off Ms. Taxman was a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled 8-4 that the board did not lay off the white teacher for the permissible purpose of remedying past discrimination in its employment practices, since there were no allegations of such discrimination and the district already employed a significant proportion of black teachers.

Ms. Taxman had also won before a federal district judge in Newark in 1993. Her case had been brought by the Department of Justice under the administration of President Bush.

The case began to attract nationwide attention in 1994 when the Clinton administration sought to reverse the federal government’s position while the case was on appeal to the 3rd Circuit court. The Justice Department tried to argue that the school board could make a race-based layoff for the sake of diversity.

The 3rd Circuit court essentially removed the Justice Department from the case. But early this year, the Supreme Court asked the Clinton administration for its views.

The administration argued that the high court should not review the case because the 1989 layoff between two employees of equal seniority was so unusual. But once the justices took the case, the administration switched its 1994 stance and argued that the Piscataway board did violate Title VII with the race-based layoff.

However, the administration argued that the 3rd Circuit court went too far in ruling that diversity could never be the basis for affirmative action in employment.

Staff Writer Kerry A. White and Associate Editor Mary-Ellen Phelps Deily contributed to this report.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
6 Key Trends in Teaching and Learning
As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and a return to the classroom for many—we come better prepared, but questions remain. How will the last year impact teaching and learning this school
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Ensuring Continuity of Learning: How to Prepare for the Next Disruption
Across the country, K-12 schools and districts are, again, considering how to ensure effective continuity of learning in the face of emerging COVID variants, politicized debates, and more. Learn from Alexandria City Public Schools superintendent
Content provided by Class
Teaching Profession Live Online Discussion What Have We Learned From Teachers During the Pandemic?
University of California, Santa Cruz, researcher Lora Bartlett and her colleagues spent months studying how the pandemic affected classroom teachers. We will discuss the takeaways from her research not only for teachers, but also for

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Federal Judge Denies Parents' Suit to Block Florida's Ban on School Mask Mandates
The parents argued that their children, due to health conditions, were at particular risk if any of their peers attend school without masks.
David Goodhue, Miami Herald
3 min read
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaks at the opening of a monoclonal antibody site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., on Aug. 18, 2021. The on-again, off-again ban imposed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to prevent mandating masks for Florida school students is back in force. The 1st District Court of Appeal ruled Friday, Sept. 10, that a Tallahassee judge should not have lifted an automatic stay two days ago that halted enforcement of the mask mandate ban.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaks at the opening of a monoclonal antibody site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., on Aug. 18, 2021. The on-again, off-again ban imposed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to prevent mandating masks for Florida school students is back in force. The 1st District Court of Appeal ruled Friday, Sept. 10, that a Tallahassee judge should not have lifted an automatic stay two days ago that halted enforcement of the mask mandate ban.
Marta Lavandier/AP
Law & Courts Texas Attorney General Sues More School Districts That Require Masks
The Texas attorney general's office anticipates filing more lawsuits against districts flouting the governor’s order. Will Dallas be next?
Talia Richman, The Dallas Morning News
4 min read
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at the Austin Police Association in Austin, Texas, on Sept. 10, 2020.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at the Austin Police Association in Austin, Texas, on Sept. 10, 2020.
Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP
Law & Courts Can They Do That? Questions Swirl Around COVID-19 School Vaccine Mandates
With at least one large school district adopting a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, here is a look at the legal landscape for such a requirement.
5 min read
Image of a band-aid being placed on the arm.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts High Court Justice Rejects Student's Bid to Block Removal Over Sexual Harassment Claim
Justice Elena Kagan denied a California student's effort to return to school after his 'emergency' suspension under Title IX regulations.
3 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington as seen on Oct. 7, 2020. After more than a decade in which the Supreme Court moved gradually toward more leniency for minors convicted of murder, the justices have moved the other way. The high court ruled 6-3 Thursday along ideological lines against a Mississippi inmate sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for fatally stabbing his grandfather when the defendant was 15 years old. The case is important because it marks a break with the court’s previous rulings and is evidence of the impact of a newly more conservative court.
The U.S. Supreme Court as seen on Oct. 7, 2020.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP