Law & Courts

N.C. Cites Progress in Satisfying Equity Lawsuit

By Kathleen Kennedy Manzo — April 14, 2004 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Members of the North Carolina state board of education say they are already on track in complying with a judge’s finding that more money and other resources must be provided to help low-wealth districts offer a high-quality education to all students.

Wake County Superior Court Judge Howard E. Manning Jr. sent a letter to board Chairman Howard N. Lee and state schools chief Michael E. Ward on March 27 in response to a state report outlining the progress North Carolina has made in meeting the court’s demands in the 10-year-old school finance case. The judge’s directive was a departure from his previous ruling, which did not call for additional funding.

Two days later, the state board concluded that its recent request for some $22 million in the state’s supplemental budget would help poorer districts hire and provide professional development for well-qualified teachers, as the court ordered.

“We firmly believe we are heading in the right direction and that we must continue to aggressively build on the strategies we have already implemented,” Mr. Lee said, according to a summary of the board’s closed-session discussion of the issue.

Given the state’s tight budget, however, it is unclear whether the legislature will approve the request when it convenes in May, Mr. Lee said.

The lawsuit, which was brought by five of the state’s poorest rural districts in 1994, charged that North Carolina was not providing adequate educational resources for disadvantaged children. One plaintiff, Hoke County, was selected as the representative district to present the case at trial.

Appeal Pending

In April 2002, Judge Manning directed the state to provide prekindergarten classes for 4- year-olds considered at risk of academic failure and to do more to ensure that all students had competent teachers and administrators.

In its most recent report to the court, the state said it was addressing the judge’s demands through a plan to help low-wealth districts reduce teacher turnover, offer content-area professional development, and attract high-caliber teachers to schools that have the most difficulty doing so.

The judge’s response to the report included for the first time a suggestion that additional funding for the districts would be required to meet the court’s demands.

The previous ruling, in fact, concluded that the education budget was adequate and that money should be diverted from other programs, such as extracurricular activities and programs for gifted students. (“Do More for Needy Students, N.C. Court Orders,” April 10, 2002.)

Some observers praised the judge’s most recent determination.

“I’m very encouraged by this, because, for the first time in a decade, there has been recognition that it will take additional resources to make some of the changes the judge says need to be made,” said John Dornan, the executive director of the Public School Forum of North Carolina.

Meanwhile, state leaders are awaiting a decision on their appeal of Judge Manning’s April 2002 ruling.

While state officials argued that they had instituted a preschool program and were in the process of making the other required changes, they questioned whether such services are required under the state constitution.

The appeal also questions the use of test results as the measure for determining whether a student has received the requisite education.

Related Tags:


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Conservatives’ Checklist: U.S. Supreme Court Education Decisions to Overrule
Here are five education issues that could be targets for reconsideration if Roe v. Wade falls.
3 min read
The Supreme Court in Washington, Dec. 3, 2021. The Supreme Court has turned away a plea from parents to block a new admissions policy at a prestigious high school in northern Virginia that a lower court had found discriminates against Asian American students.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 3, 2021.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts Leaked Abortion Draft Has Supreme Court Education Cases in Political Cross-Hairs
Conservatives have taken aim at decisions on educating immigrants, race in admissions, and religion. Liberals have some cases in mind, too.
8 min read
supreme court SOC
Law & Courts 'Brown v. Board' Cited in Draft Supreme Court Opinion to Back Overturning Abortion Rights
The leaked opinion in a case still to be decided by the Supreme Court cites landmark decisions including Brown v. Board of Education.
7 min read
A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Monday night, May 2, 2022 in Washington. A draft opinion circulated among Supreme Court justices suggests that earlier this year a majority of them had thrown support behind overturning the 1973 case Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a report published Monday night in Politico. It's unclear if the draft represents the court's final word on the matter. The Associated Press could not immediately confirm the authenticity of the draft Politico posted, which if verified marks a shocking revelation of the high court's secretive deliberation process, particularly before a case is formally decided.
A crowd gathers outside the U.S. Supreme Court Monday night after the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the court intends to overturn the 1973 <i>Roe v. Wade</i> precedent that legalized abortion nationwide.
Alex Brandon/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Rules Against Some 'Emotional Distress' Claims. What It Means for Schools
The dissenters say the decision means students cannot recover damages for the emotional harms of race, sex, or disability bias.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.