Michigan Chief Sees School Ratings, Sanctions in Future

By Bess Keller — January 16, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Michigan state schools chief Thomas D. Watkins is betting that his new blueprint for school accountability will win approval by this spring, ending four years of official wavering over how best to rate schools in the Great Lakes State.

The new system, which still faces a vote by the state board of education, would base annual school ratings less on state test scores than did the unpopular one it would replace. It received a relatively warm reception from educators when it was unveiled last month.

“We’ve developed an accreditation system that’s worthy of the 21st century,” Mr. Watkins said. “It’s fair, balanced, and with rigorous standards.”

Mr. Watkins scrapped the state’s previous accountability plan about two months after taking the superintendent’s job last year. That system had based school ratings almost wholly on Michigan Educational Assessment Program scores, a strategy that educators across the state vehemently criticized. The system Mr. Watkins tossed out had been three years in the making, but had never gotten to the point of producing public rankings.

Under state law, schools that get poor ratings from the state face a range of sanctions, including replacement of the principal or even closure. But, without a system to rate schools, the sanctions cannot be applied.

Like Florida’s, the new system would tag each school with an A-to-F letter grade. More than a half-dozen factors other than test scores would count for a quarter of the grade. The factors would include degree of family involvement, attendance and dropout rates, quality of professional development, and, for high schools, the proportion of students enrolled in college-level classes.

‘Roasting the Hot Dog’

The rest of a school’s grade would come from MEAP test scores considered in three different ways: how students scored on average in a single year, how they scored on average in each of three consecutive years, and how they scored individually on the tests from one level to the next (4th to 7th grade, for instance).

The aim is to capture not only a school’s current level of achievement, but change over time, and the boost that schools give to individual student achievement.

The framework does not yet specify cutoffs, or the way in which non-test factors would be measured.

Under the proposal, schools would receive their first grades in the spring of 2003, but the grades could not lead to sanctions until 2005 when the data for schools would be complete.

The timeline is a sticking point for the plan’s critics, who wonder if state education officials have the political moxie to forge ahead.

“We’ve fiddled around the campfire for years and every time we get close to roasting the hot dog, the whole process gets put off another year or so,” said James M. Sandy, the executive director of Michigan Business Leaders for Educational Excellence, a group whose members include the state Chamber of Commerce.

Educator complaints about the current system, which was to have provided ratings last year, peaked after a newspaper estimated that some 900 of Michigan’s roughly 2,850 schools would be designated “not accredited.”

Mr. Sandy said his group is tired of waiting and will soon release its own list of high-achieving schools as measured by MEAP results.

The group is not alone in growing impatient. State legislators and Gov. John Engler, a Republican, have also voiced frustration with the delay.

In general, however, education leaders, including the powerful Michigan Education Association—the state affiliate of the National Education Association— have hailed the new plan as an improvement.

“I think it’s much fairer,” concluded Michael P. Flanagan, the executive director of the Michigan Association of School Administrators. Nonetheless, the former local and regional superintendent said he is lobbying hard for the system to include at least one additional grade that would indicate a school’s success in raising the MEAP scores of those students that schools have so often failed academically—children from poor families and those from minority groups.

Mr. Watkins’ proposal will be discussed at seven public hearings across the state, beginning this week.

In more complete form, the plan is expected to go to the state board of education for a vote in February, then to the House and Senate education committees, which must also ratify the plan. Approval is not required from the full legislature.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 16, 2002 edition of Education Week as Michigan Chief Sees School Ratings, Sanctions in Future


Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Personalized Learning Webinar
No Time to Waste: Individualized Instruction Will Drive Change
Targeted support and intervention can boost student achievement. Join us to explore tutoring’s role in accelerating the turnaround. 
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools
Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning: Making It Meaningful
Join us for this event with educators and experts on the damage the pandemic did to academic and social and emotional well-being.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

States Educators Weigh K-12 Impact From an Unpredictable Election
Many of the most contentious issues in the 2022 midterms resonate most at the local level.
6 min read
"I Voted" stickers sit in a pile at the Fairview Recreation Center in North Minneapolis.
"I Voted" stickers sit in a pile at the Fairview Recreation Center in North Minneapolis during the midterm elections on Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2022.
Tim Evans/Minnesota Public Radio via AP
States K-12 and the Midterms: What to Watch For
Educators sound off on what the hard-fought midterm elections could mean for K-12 policy.
6 min read
Aidan Lau-Struck, 6, helps his mom Stephanie Lau feed her ballot into the machine at the Brighton Green Community Association voting precinct in North Chesterfield, Va., on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2022.
Aidan Lau-Struck, 6, helps his mother, Stephanie Lau, feed her ballot into the machine at the Brighton Green Community Association voting precinct in North Chesterfield, Va., on Election Day.
Eva Russo/Richmond Times-Dispatch via AP
States K-12 Insider or Conservative Advocate? Stark Choice in One State Superintendent's Race
A think tank CEO and a high school English teacher battle it out for South Carolina's top K-12 job.
8 min read
Ellen Weaver, the Republican nominee for South Carolina superintendent of education, speaks at U.S. Rep. Jeff Duncan's Faith & Freedom BBQ ahead of the keynote speaker, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on Monday, Aug. 22, 2022, in Anderson, S.C.
Ellen Weaver, the Republican nominee for South Carolina superintendent of education, speaks at U.S. Rep. Jeff Duncan's Faith & Freedom BBQ in Anderson, S.C.
Meg Kinnard/AP
States School-Related Ballot Measures to Watch This Midterm Election
Voters in six states will decide on issues ranging from more funding for free school meals and the arts to reining in the state board.
7 min read
Image of ballots going into a box.