Law & Courts

Houston Settles Over E-Rate Corruption Allegations

By The Associated Press — March 15, 2010 2 min read

The largest public school system in Texas has agreed to pay $850,000 as part of a civil settlement relating to claims that employees accepted meals and other gifts in connection with the federal E-rate program.

The agreement settles allegations by the U.S. Department of Justice that the Houston school district provided false information to the Federal Communications Commission’s education-rate program, which provides funding for schools and libraries to connect to and utilize the Internet.

The Justice Department said last week that the Houston district, which has more than 200,000 students attending 295 schools, also engaged in noncompetitive bidding practices for E-rate contracts.

Greg Meyers, the president of the Houston school board, said settling the allegations was a sound business decision that will help level the digital playing field for students by restoring school technology funding awards.

Under the E-rate program, created by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and funded by fees collected from telephone users, schools apply for aid to pay for hardware and monthly service fees for Internet connections.

Protecting ‘Integrity’

The Justice Department contended that the Houston Independent School District provided false information to the E-rate program and otherwise violated the program’s requirements by engaging in noncompetitive bidding practices for E-rate contracts. It further alleged that district officials received gratuities from technology vendors, including trips, meals, and loans.

Digital Directions

Education Week recently began a special technology feature that will appear in every issue of the newspaper, covering news, trends, and ideas about digital learning and administrative uses of tech tools in schools.

Visit Education Week Digital Directions Web site for regular updates on news, trends, and ideas in education technology.

“The E-rate program provides critical support for Internet access and wiring to the most underserved schools in the country,” Tony West, the assistant attorney general for the civil division of the Justice Department, said in a statement. “We are committed to protecting the integrity of this important program that benefits our neediest children.”

Mr. West noted that the resolution announced last week resulted from an ongoing federal investigation of possible fraud and anti-competitive conduct in the E-rate program in Texas. The investigation is a collaborative effort involving the Justice Department’s civil division, the U.S. attorney’s office for the Northern District of Texas, and the FCC’s office of the inspector general.

The settlement with the Houston district is part of the federal government’s efforts to combat fraud through the use of enforcement tools such as the False Claims Act. Since January 2009, the Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases have topped $3 billion.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 17, 2010 edition of Education Week as E-Rate Claims Lead to Fine for Houston


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
How Schools Can Implement Safe In-Person Learning
In order for in-person schooling to resume, it will be necessary to instill a sense of confidence that it is safe to return. BD is hosting a virtual panel discussing the benefits of asymptomatic screening
Content provided by BD

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts How a Cheerleader's Snapchat Profanity Could Shape the Limits of Students' Free Speech
Brandi Levy's social media post is the basis for a case before the U.S. Supreme Court on whether schools may punish off-campus speech.
9 min read
Image of Brandi Levy.
Brandi Levy, now an 18-year-old college freshman, was a cheerleader at Mahanoy Area High School in Pennsylvania when she made profane comments on Snapchat that are now at the center of a U.S. Supreme Court case on student speech rights.
Danna Singer/Provided by the American Civil Liberties Union
Law & Courts Student School Board Members Flex Their Civic Muscle in Supreme Court Free-Speech Case
Current and former student school board members add their growing voices to a potentially precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court case.
7 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
Law & Courts Justice Department Memo Could Stoke State-Federal Fights Over Transgender Students' Rights
Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, a Justice Department memo says.
3 min read
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on transgender girls and women from female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D. on March 11, 2021.
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on allowing transgender girls and women to play in female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D.
Stephen Groves/AP
Law & Courts Diverse Array of Groups Back Student in Supreme Court Case on Off-Campus Speech
John and Mary Beth Tinker, central to the landmark speech case that bears their name, argue that even offensive speech merits protection.
5 min read
In this photo taken Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, Mary Beth Tinker, 61, shows an old photograph of her with her brother John Tinker to the Associated Press during an interview in Washington. Tinker was just 13 when she spoke out against the Vietnam War by wearing a black armband to her Iowa school in 1965. When the school suspended her, she took her free speech case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and won. Her message: Students should take action on issues important to them. "It's better for our whole society when kids have a voice," she says.
In this 2013 photo, Mary Beth Tinker shows a 1968 Associated Press photograph of her with her brother John Tinker displaying the armbands they had worn in school to protest the Vietnam War. (The peace symbols were added after the school protest). The Tinkers have filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting a Pennsylvania student who was disciplined for an offensive message on Snapchat.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP