Federal

House Plan Slashes Aid for Education Shows on Public TV

By Vaishali Honawar — June 21, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Democrats in Congress and supporters of public broadcasting say that pure politics, rather than budget considerations, led a congressional subcommittee to approve deep budget cuts to public television and radio this month. The plan includes the elimination of a Department of Education program that helps seed children’s educational TV shows.

“There are those in Congress who’ve wanted to eliminate public broadcasting for a long time, and the horrible deficit situation plus the perception that public broadcasting is divided right now has created an opportunity in their eyes to act now,” said John Lawson, the president of the Association of Public Television Stations, a Washington lobbying group for individual stations.

Under the cuts approved June 9 by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federal money to public-television and -radio outlets, would decrease from $400 million this year to $300 million in fiscal 2006, which begins Oct. 1. The CPB provides a foundation of funding for basic operations for many stations, which allows them to pay dues for national programs that include the most popular educational shows.

The subcommittee’s bill also eliminated entirely the $23 million Ready to Learn program in the Education Department, which helps pay for a slate of popular children’s educational shows including “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” “Sesame Street,” and “Postcards from Buster,” which drew criticism from Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings earlier this year over an episode featuring two families headed by lesbian couples.

The full appropriations committee, which met June 16, approved all the cuts for fiscal 2006, but also approved an amendment from Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis., to restore funding for fiscal 2008 that had been left out from the bill.

Since 1976, public broadcasting has been “forward funded” by two years to “provide a degree of insulation from the political currents of the day,” Mr. Lawson said.

Pat Mitchell, the president of the Public Broadcasting Service, said the cuts, if passed by the full Congress, could have a “severely detrimental effect” on children’s and prime-time programming.

Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, the chairman of the subcommittee, said in a statement that its members had to make “tough choices by reconciling competing priorities with the resources available.”

“Choices are easy when dollars are plentiful, but that was not the case this year,” he said.

Political Interference

Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, an appointee of President Clinton’s to the CPB board, was named its chairman by President Bush in 2003. He vowed to rid public television of what he said was a perception that it was not politically balanced.

Some of his decisions since, including the hiring of a consultant to investigate the ideological leanings of the guests on one popular news show, have raised concerns of editorial freedom among public television officials.

Mr. Lawson said that the controversy over “Postcards from Buster” may have played into the decision to cut public-broadcasting funds.

“I know that there were some in Congress who were upset that PBS even considered airing a program that included a family headed by two mommies,” he said.

Mr. Tomlinson was not available for an interview, but in a statement posted on the CPB’s Web site, he expressed concern over the cuts.

“We will be joining with our colleagues in the public-broadcasting community to make the case for a higher level of funding as the appropriations measure makes its way through Congress,” he said.

Ms. Mitchell said in an interview that programs such as Ready to Learn are helping children learn to read, and helping their parents, caregivers and teachers prepare youngsters for success in school. (“Federal Grant Boosts Educational Television, Faces Fresh Scrutiny,” Feb. 9, 2005.)

“All of public broadcasting is working very hard right now to remind Congress how our programming and services support, rather than compete with, congressional priorities,” she said.

Events

Reading & Literacy K-12 Essentials Forum Supporting Struggling Readers in Middle and High School
Join this free virtual event to learn more about policy, data, research, and experiences around supporting older students who struggle to read.
School & District Management Webinar Squeeze More Learning Time Out of the School Day
Learn how to increase learning time for your students by identifying and minimizing classroom disruptions.
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal From Our Research Center Trump Shifted CTE to the Labor Dept. What Has That Meant for Schools?
What educators think of shifting CTE to another federal agency could preview how they'll view a bigger shuffle.
3 min read
Collage style illustration showing a large hand pointing to the right, while a small male pulls up an arrow filled with money and pushes with both hands to reverse it toward the right side of the frame.
DigitalVision Vectors + Getty
Federal Video Here’s What the Ed. Dept. Upheaval Will Mean for Schools
The Trump administration took significant steps this week toward eliminating the U.S. Department of Education.
1 min read
The U.S. Department of Education building is pictured in a double exposure on Oct. 24, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Department of Education building is pictured in a double exposure on Oct. 24, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
Maansi Srivastava for Education Week
Federal What State Education Chiefs Think as Trump Moves Programs Out of the Ed. Dept.
The department's announcement this week represents a consequential structural change for states.
6 min read
The U.S. Department of Education building is seen behind the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial on Oct. 24, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Department of Education building is seen behind the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial on Oct. 24, 2025 in Washington, D.C. The department is shifting many of its functions to four other federal agencies as the Trump administration tries to downsize it. State education chiefs stand to be most directly affected.
Maansi Srivastava for Education Week
Federal See Where the Ed. Dept.'s Programs Will Move as the Trump Admin. Downsizes
Programs overseen by the Ed. Dept. will move to agencies including the Department of Labor.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order regarding education in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, April 23, 2025, in Washington, as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon watch.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order regarding education in the Oval Office of the White House on April 23, 2025, as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon watch. The Trump administration on Tuesday announced that it's sending many of the Department of Education's K-12 and higher education programs to other federal agencies.
Alex Brandon/AP