Leadership Symposium Early Bird Deadline Approaching | Join K-12 leaders nationwide for three days of empowering strategies, networking, and inspiration! Discounted pricing ends March 1. Register today.
Law & Courts A Washington Roundup

High Court Declines Case Involving Columbine Parents

By Caroline Hendrie — March 01, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The parents of a student killed in the 1999 shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado lost their bid last week to have the U.S. Supreme Court review a lower-court decision that blocked them from backing out of a legal settlement with the parents of the two student gunmen.

Michael and Vonda Shoels argued that they never intended to agree to an out-of-court settlement with the parents of Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who together shot 24 people during the notorious shooting spree at Columbine High School in the Jefferson County school district on April 20, 1999. The pair fatally shot a teacher and 12 students, including the Shoelses’ son Isaiah, before committing suicide.

A U.S. District Court judge in Denver did not accept the parents’ argument that they had only appeared to accept the settlement because of a mistake by their lawyer’s office, and therefore were denied their right to a jury trial. The judge ruled in 2003 that the agreement was enforceable. It called for the parents to release their claim in exchange for receiving a share of a $1.5 million fund set up by the Harris and Klebold families.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver, upheld that ruling last summer. On Feb. 22, the Supreme Court declined without comment to take up the family’s appeal in Shoels v. Klebold (Case No. 04-710).

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 02, 2005 edition of Education Week


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts School District Lawsuits Against Social Media Companies Are Piling Up
More than 200 school districts are now suing the major social media companies over the youth mental health crisis.
7 min read
A close up of a statue of the blindfolded lady justice against a light blue background with a ghosted image of a hands holding a cellphone with Facebook "Like" and "Love" icons hovering above it.
Law & Courts In 1974, the Supreme Court Recognized English Learners' Rights. The Story Behind That Case
The Lau v. Nichols ruling said students have a right to a "meaningful opportunity" to participate in school, but its legacy is complex.
12 min read
Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William O. Douglas is shown in an undated photo.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, shown in an undated photo, wrote the opinion in <i>Lau</i> v. <i>Nichols</i>, the 1974 decision holding that the San Francisco school system had denied Chinese-speaking schoolchildren a meaningful opportunity to participate in their education.
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.