Ga. District’s Fiasco Prompting Reforms

By Linda Jacobson — January 21, 2009 1 min read

Dismayed by a school district’s loss of accreditation because of its former school board’s behavior, business leaders, educators, and other experts across Georgia have worked for months to craft recommendations for avoiding such disasters in the future.

With the legislative session now under way, some of their proposals, such as mandating training for board members and requiring ethics and conflict-of-interest policies for school boards, could become law.

Last September, the 50,000-student Clayton County district, south of Atlanta, became the first in the nation in almost 40 years to lose accreditation after misdeeds by the nine-member board. The district, with a completely new board, is working to earn back accreditation from the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools before a one-year deadline expires. (“Loss of Accreditation Rocks Georgia District,” Sept. 3, 2008.)

Meanwhile, the five-member board for the 4,000-student Haralson County district, in the northwest part of Georgia, is accused of similar misgovernance, such as not following a chain of command and interfering with district business that is out of the realm of board members’ responsibility.

Phil Jacobs, a co-chairman of the Commission for School Board Excellence, which was created by the state board of education, said several other districts’ accreditation could also be at risk.

Mr. Jacobs said his commission’s work could serve as a model for other states.

“This wasn’t about trying to fix Clayton,” said Mr. Jacobs, the retired president of AT&T Georgia, formerly BellSouth.

Mark Elgart, the president of Advanced, the parent organization of SACS, said in a press release that the measures proposed by the commission “will position Georgia as a model state for school governance.”

AdvancED, the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, and the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education—a business-led group—organized the commission, along with the state school board.

Other recommendations include a call for nonpartisan board elections and a provision that when boards are unable to govern themselves, the state board of education be allowed to intervene.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 21, 2009 edition of Education Week


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Advance Educational Equity
Schools are welcoming students back into buildings for full-time in-person instruction in a few short weeks and now is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and systems to build
Content provided by PowerMyLearning
Classroom Technology Webinar Making Big Technology Decisions: Advice for District Leaders, Principals, and Teachers
Educators at all levels make decisions that can have a huge impact on students. That’s especially true when it comes to the use of technology, which was activated like never before to help students learn
Professional Development Webinar Expand Digital Learning by Expanding Teacher Training
This discussion will examine how things have changed and offer guidance on smart, cost-effective ways to expand digital learning efforts and train teachers to maximize the use of new technologies for learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Accountability The Feds Offered Waivers on ESSA Accountability. Here's Where States Stand on Getting Them
While they get less attention than testing waivers, flexibility related to low-performing schools is an important federal and state issue.
5 min read
Image of a student taking a test with a mask on.
Rich Vintage/E+
Accountability Opinion Absenteeism Is the Wrong Student Engagement Metric to Use Right Now
In a post-pandemic era for school accountability, let’s focus on measuring what matters.
Sara Johnson, Annette Anderson & Ruth R. Faden
4 min read
Figure being erased.
Accountability Biden Education Team Squashes States' Push to Nix All Tests but Approves Other Flexibility
The department has telegraphed its decision to deny states' requests to cancel federally mandated tests for weeks.
3 min read
A first-grader learns keyboarding skills at Bayview Elementary School in San Pablo, Calif on March 12, 2015. Schools around the country are teaching students as young as 6 years old, basic typing and other keyboarding skills. The Common Core education standards adopted by a majority of states call for students to be able to use technology to research, write and give oral presentations, but the imperative for educators arrived with the introduction of standardized tests that are taken on computers instead of with paper and pencils.
The U.S. Department of Education denied some states' requests to cancel standardized tests this year. Others are seeking flexibility from some testing requirements, rather than skipping the assessments altogether.
Eric Risberg/AP
Accountability Explainer Will There Be Standardized Tests This Year? 8 Questions Answered
Educators want to know: Will the exams happen? If so, what will they look like, and how will the results be used?
12 min read
Students testing.