Law & Courts

Decades-Old Desegregation Case Drawing to a Close in Tucson, Ariz.

By Danyelle Khmara, The Arizona Daily Star — April 22, 2021 5 min read
Image shows a courtroom and gavel.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

After more than 40 years, the Tucson Unified School District is being released from court oversight for its decades-old desegregation case, put in place to eliminate vestiges of past discrimination.

The federal judge in the 43-year-old case granted TUSD full unitary status under the condition that it submits a plan, by May 19, to continue the work of racial equity throughout the district.

“It is time for the district to be released from judicial oversight and held accountable by the community,” Judge David C. Bury, for the U.S. District of Arizona, wrote in the April 19 court order.

Oversight of the post unitary status plan would fall to the governing board, instead of the court.

The case stemmed from two class-action lawsuits filed in 1974 by Black American and Mexican American students alleging segregation in TUSD, and was consolidated a year later. In 1978, the court found that discriminatory segregation existed in TUSD.

Under the federal court order, however, TUSD was required to focus on more than racial integration. The case called for addressing not only quality of education, but student discipline disparities, facilities and technology, transportation and community engagement, among other issues.

The new post unitary plan must include benchmark events that are still to come, continued posting of the district’s annual report for a reasonable period of time to facilitate public transparency and new academic achievement measures for the current school year.

TUSD Superintendent Gabriel Trujillo said this is a proud moment for the district, which serves around 42,000 students—64 percent of whom are Hispanic and 6 percent of whom are Black.

“This unitary status plan touches every single classroom, every single locker room facility, every single playing field, every bus route,” he said during an April 4 press briefing. “Therefore, its success is wholly due to the hard working educators and staff members of the Tucson District as a whole. ... We’ve been committed to the foundational principles of the Unitary Status Plan that position this district to be a national leader in culturally-responsive and -relevant instruction and responsiveness to students, as well as equity and opportunity for all students in all of our schools.”

Sylvia Campoy, representative for the Latino plaintiffs in the case, says that monitoring is critical in contending with issues of race and inequity.

“We live in an era during which the reality of institutionalized and structural racism is finally being recognized throughout mainstream America, much due to the viewing of murders by police officers, such as the murder of George Floyd,” she said in an email.

Campoy says TUSD’s most recent data indicates disparity for African American and Latino students in academic achievement as demonstrated in low test scores, low participation in advanced learning programs, a disparity of disciplinary action to African American students, and other critical areas.

The court rejected the plaintiffs’ requests that unitary status not be granted until the district had attained certain measures of equity in areas such as faculty diversity, access to Advanced Learning Experience programs, and narrowing the student achievement gap between white and Black American and Latino students.

In his order, Bury wrote that TUSD had made significant progress on its desegregation efforts over the last six years, putting best practices into place and monitoring their effectiveness.

“These operations over six years, from 2013 through now, have eliminated the vestiges of segregation to the extent practicable over this period of time,” Bury wrote, also noting that the actions during that timeframe show a “lasting commitment” to the efforts undertaken.

“The district has the commitment, the relevant data, technology, and the expertise to make program decisions, now and in the future, based on the effectiveness of strategies and programs to integrate its schools and afford equal access to educational opportunities and improve academic achievement for African America and Latino, including English-learner students,” he said.

The path forward

For decades, TUSD has accessed about $63 million annually from a tax levy to cover expenses in the desegregation effort. Trujillo says that will continue for the coming school year with the budget nearly finalized. Desegregation funding pays for student services like magnet, dual-language and gifted and talented programs.

But going forward, the district will work with the desegregation expert who oversaw the case to figure out the price tag for the programs and structures that allowed the district to become more integrated and expand learning experiences to more students while also looking at what can be cut, such as legal fees.

“Our goal as an administration is to bring a modicum of relief to the homeowners and the taxpayers that have footed the $63 million bill for the last 40 years, but doing so responsibly, doing so collaboratively through structures of community oversight and transparency that allow us to maintain all of the great programming that promoted integration and access and opportunity,” Trujillo said.

In addition to developing a post unitary status plan, the district also has to respond to two outstanding requests for information, by May 3, from each of the plaintiffs.

One request is whether the strategies to open TUSD’s newest schools—Innovation Tech and Wakefield—promote integration and have been implemented with fidelity, and the other is responding to an inquiry that says the district is in violation of the court’s order by failing to include academic performance for Black and Latino students in its criteria for 2021 magnet school plans.

The district is also responsible for filing a report by May 31 on shuttle bus routes running to University High School to support racial integration in advanced learning experiences.

With those final items, Trujillo hopes to have the case closed by May 31, though he recognizes the plaintiffs could appeal the judge’s decision, as they successfully did after the court granted TUSD unitary status in 2009.

Copyright (c) 2021, The Arizona Daily Star (Tucson, Ariz.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning
Budget & Finance Webinar Staffing Schools After ESSER: What School and District Leaders Need to Know
Join our newsroom for insights on investing in critical student support positions as pandemic funds expire.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How can districts build sustainable tutoring models before the money runs out?
District leaders, low on funds, must decide: broad support for all or deep interventions for few? Let's discuss maximizing tutoring resources.
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts District Can Deny Opt-Outs on LGBTQ+ Books, Court Rules
Religious parents objected to a Maryland district's policy ending opt-outs for elementary school 'storybooks' with LGBTQ+ themes.
5 min read
A pedestrian passes by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse, June 16, 2021, on Main Street in Richmond, Va.
A person walks near the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit's courthouse in Richmond, Va. A panel of the court denied an injunction seeking to restore religious parents' opportunity to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ "storybooks" in a Maryland district.
Steve Helber/AP
Law & Courts Brown v. Board of Education: 70 Years of Progress and Challenges
The milestone for the historic 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down racial segregation in schools is marked by a range of tributes
12 min read
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
People mill around the third floor of the Kansas Statehouse in front of a Brown v. Board of Education mural before hearing from speakers recognizing the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court case on April 29, 2024 in Topeka, Kan.
Evert Nelson/The Topeka Capital-Journal via AP
Law & Courts Republican-Led States Sue to Block New Title IX Rule
A pair of lawsuits focus on the rule's protections for students' gender identity.
5 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus. Four Republican-led states filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Biden administration's new Title IX regulation, which among other things would codify protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Patrick Orsagos/AP
Law & Courts Why It Will Now Be Easier for Educators to Sue Over Job Transfers
The case asked whether transferred employees had to show a 'significant' change in job conditions to sue under Title VII. The court said no.
8 min read
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022.
Light illuminates part of the Supreme Court building at dusk on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 16, 2022. The high court on Wednesday, April 17, 2024, made it easier for workers, including educators, to sue over job transfers.
Patrick Semansky/AP