Law & Courts

Court to Look at Drug Testing Of Nonathletes

By Mark Walsh — November 14, 2001 | Corrected: February 23, 2019 3 min read

Corrected: The correct vote in Vernonia School District v. Acton was 6-3, with Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, John Paul Stevens and David H. Souter in the minority.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed last week to revisit the issue of drug testing of students in public schools. The court will review an Oklahoma district’s policy of random testing of not just athletes but also students involved in other interscholastic activities, such as cheerleading, band, and the Future Farmers of America.

The outcome of the case is likely to be felt nationwide because the crucial legal question involves whether school boards must document a serious drug problem in their schools before adopting random-testing programs.

In a 1995 decision, the court upheld an Oregon district’s program of testing student athletes for drugs. But the 5-4 ruling in that case, Vernonia School District v. Acton, relied heavily on evidence that the Vernonia district had a serious drug problem and that athletes were “leaders of the drug culture.”

Since then, more districts have adopted testing of athletes, and a few have sought to test students in other extracurricular activities. The Lockney, Texas, district adopted a policy of testing all students in grades 7- 12 for drugs. But that program was struck down by a federal district judge earlier this year, and the district did not appeal the ruling.

The Oklahoma case accepted by the Supreme Court last week involves the 2,200-student Tecumseh district near Oklahoma City.

In 1998, the district adopted a program of random drug testing of students involved in all interscholastic competition. That includes athletics as well as cheerleading, pompom, vocal music, band, academic team, the Future Farmers of America, and the Future Homemakers of America.

Policy Struck Down

The school board was generally concerned that drug abuse was a problem in the district, and the district had experienced incidents in which marijuana was found, according to court documents. The district settled on testing participants in interscholastic activities because, it reasoned, those students had already voluntarily placed themselves under more stringent rules, and because they were allowed to travel as school representatives.

With the backing of the American Civil Liberties Union, the families of three students challenged the policy. A federal district judge upheld the testing program as reasonable, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver, struck it down last March.

A panel of the appeals court ruled 2-1 that the Tecumseh policy violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable government searches. The majority said that the Supreme Court’s Vernonia ruling emphasized that athletes could put themselves and other players at risk of physical harm while under the influence of drugs.

“It is difficult to imagine how participants in vocal choir, or the academic team, or even the [Future Homemakers of America] are in physical danger if they compete in those activities while using drugs, any more than any student is at risk simply from using drugs,” said the majority opinion.

The appellate court rejected the district’s arguments that its policy was justified under the Vernonia decision because some band members carry heavy instruments, and FFA participants sometimes wrestle large animals.

School districts seeking to impose drug testing as a condition of joining in a school activity “must demonstrate that there is some identifiable drug-abuse problem among a sufficient number of those subject to the testing,” the 10th Circuit court said.

In its appeal to the Supreme Court in Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 v. Earls (Case No. 01-332), the Tecumseh district said the 10th Circuit ruling conflicted with a 1998 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in Chicago, that upheld an Indiana district’s policy of testing all extracurricular participants for drugs.

The district argues that school board members should be able to use “reason and common sense” to determine that a drug problem exists in their schools.

What’s the Problem?

The justices granted review of the case on Nov. 8. The case will be argued next spring, with a decision likely by early next summer.

In its response on behalf of the families who challenged the policy, the ACLU argued that the Tecumseh district has never had a serious drug problem.

“Only alcohol and tobacco have been identified as significant problems among the student body, and the testing method under the policy does not screen for either substance,” the ACLU’s brief said.

A version of this article appeared in the November 14, 2001 edition of Education Week as Court to Look at Drug Testing Of Nonathletes

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Building Equitable Systems: Moving Math From Gatekeeper to Opportunity Gateway
The importance of disrupting traditional American math practices and adopting high-quality math curriculum continues to be essential for changing the trajectory of historically under-resourced schools. Building systems around high-quality math curriculum also is necessary to
Content provided by Partnership for L.A. Schools
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by Learning.com

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Justice Department Memo Could Stoke State-Federal Fights Over Transgender Students' Rights
Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, a Justice Department memo says.
3 min read
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on transgender girls and women from female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D. on March 11, 2021.
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on allowing transgender girls and women to play in female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D.
Stephen Groves/AP
Law & Courts Diverse Array of Groups Back Student in Supreme Court Case on Off-Campus Speech
John and Mary Beth Tinker, central to the landmark speech case that bears their name, argue that even offensive speech merits protection.
5 min read
In this photo taken Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, Mary Beth Tinker, 61, shows an old photograph of her with her brother John Tinker to the Associated Press during an interview in Washington. Tinker was just 13 when she spoke out against the Vietnam War by wearing a black armband to her Iowa school in 1965. When the school suspended her, she took her free speech case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and won. Her message: Students should take action on issues important to them. "It's better for our whole society when kids have a voice," she says.
In this 2013 photo, Mary Beth Tinker shows a 1968 Associated Press photograph of her with her brother John Tinker displaying the armbands they had worn in school to protest the Vietnam War. (The peace symbols were added after the school protest). The Tinkers have filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting a Pennsylvania student who was disciplined for an offensive message on Snapchat.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Sympathetic to College Athletes' Challenge to NCAA Rules on Education Aid
The justices weighed a case about the definition of amateurism in college athletics that may trickle down to high school and youth sports.
6 min read
BRIC ARCHIVE
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts High School Sports World Watching U.S. Supreme Court Case on NCAA Compensation Rules
The body that sets high school sports rules worries that any change on amateurism in college athletics would trickle down to K-12.
5 min read
BRIC ARCHIVE
iStock/Getty