Education Funding Federal File

Contract Renewal?

By Michelle R. Davis — March 14, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A group of more than 100 conservative Republicans in the House of Representatives is trying to evoke nostalgia for the 1990s—but they’re not aiming to revive the Macarena or the Beanie Babies craze.

They want political junkies to turn back to the Republican “Contract With America,” the 1994 policy manifesto that helped the GOP win control of Congress after decades of mostly minority status. On March 8, the Republican Study Committee, a group of House members seeking to further a rightward agenda, released a renewed Contract With America.

Their plan calls for reducing the federal deficit by nearly $400 billon over five years, and their fiscal 2007 federal budget proposal comes in at about $1 trillion less than President Bush’s $2.77 trillion plan released in February.

“With record deficits and debt, the time has come to level with the American people,” Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana, the chairman of the RSC, said in a statement. “We are not living within our means.”

The RSC has particular cuts in mind when it comes to education, and the group could play an influential role in the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act, scheduled for next year.

Its plan would do away with some of the same programs President Bush proposed for elimination in his recent budget, including Arts in Education and the Javits Gifted and Talented Education program.

But it would also tackle the largest federal initiative in K-12 education. The plan would cut Title I funding for disadvantaged students, opting to eliminate three of the four methods of distributing money to schools to educate such students. Over four years, the plan would phase out funding for concentration, education finance incentive, and targeted grants, which all help to target money to schools that have the most disadvantaged students. The bulk of Title I money goes to states through basic grants.

Some education budget watchers aren’t pleased.

“If they want to recall the bad old days,” said Edward R. Kealy, the executive director of the Committee for Education Funding, a Washington-based lobbying coalition, “they’re doing a great job reminding everyone that back during the original Contract With America, there was a desire by many Republicans to do away with the Department of Education.”

The new RSC plan doesn’t go that far.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 15, 2006 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Hidden Costs of Special Ed Vacancies: Solutions for Your District
When provider vacancies hit, students feel it first. Hear what district leaders are doing to keep IEP-related services on track.
Content provided by Huddle Up
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
How Technology Is Reshaping Childhood
How do we protect kids online while embracing innovation? Learn about navigating safety, privacy, and opportunity in the Digital Age.
Content provided by Connect x Protect
Budget & Finance Webinar Creative Approaches to K-12 Budget Realities
What are districts prioritizing in 2026? New survey data reveals emerging K-12 budgeting trends.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Trump Holds Back $2 Billion for Education Grants. What Will Happen Next?
The White House is keeping congressionally approved money locked up through a little-known process.
11 min read
050626 funding cuts trump schools lieberman fs 2270953986
Getty
Education Funding A School Wants a Tornado Shelter. A Federal Grant Keeps Getting in the Way
The district still can't spend a FEMA grant it was originally awarded in 2022.
9 min read
FemaGrant Maiorella 02
A new gym under construction in Wisconsin's Cuba City school district, pictured April 16, 2026, would have also served as a tornado shelter, thanks to an $8.8 million FEMA grant. But nearly four years after it was awarded the grant, the district still doesn't have the money.
Arthur Maiorella for Education Week
Education Funding Trump Sidestepped Congress on More Than $1 Billion in Ed. Spending Last Year
Newly published documents show how the Ed. Dept. departed from Congress' plans.
13 min read
The likeness of George Washington is seen on a U.S. one dollar bill, March 13, 2023, in Marple Township, Pa. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says it expects the federal government will be awash in debt over the next 30 years.
Newly published budget documents show the U.S. Department of Education, in the first year of President Donald Trump's second term, took roughly $1 billion Congress appropriated for specific education programs and spent it differently than how lawmakers intended—or didn't spend it all.
Matt Slocum/AP
Education Funding Federal Funds for Schools Will Still Flow Through Ed. Dept. System—For Now
The Trump administration has been touting its transfer of K-12 programs to the Labor Department.
5 min read
Remaining letters on the Department of Education on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, in Washington.
Remaining letters on the U.S. Department of Education building in Washington on Wednesday, March 18, 2026. Despite the agency's efforts to shift management of many of its programs to the U.S. Department of Labor, key K-12 funds will continue to flow through the Education Department's grants system this summer.
Allison Robbert/AP