Federal Federal File

Call Waiting on NCLB

By David J. Hoff — April 23, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

In the politics of the No Child Left Behind Act, Congress’ new members are the wild card.

Will they listen to local educators’ complaints about the 5-year-old law’s testing-and-accountability rules? Or will they buy into a commitment on the part of many national policymakers to raising student achievement so all students are proficient in reading and mathematics by the end of the 2013-14 school year?

The answers to those questions won’t be known until Congress starts debating a specific bill to reauthorize the NCLB law. Meanwhile, the newly elected members will be hearing what their local educators say.

Working with the teachers’ unions and other education groups, the first-term members are participating in telephone “town hall” meetings where their constituents can air their grievances against or support for the federal education law.

“They are a key voting block,” Greg Speed, a spokesman for Communities for Quality Education, the group organizing the events, said of the first-term members of Congress.

“They didn’t have the opportunity to vote on No Child Left Behind,” Mr. Speed said. “We felt it was important to talk with those members about what’s happening in their districts.”

So far, four such “town hall” phone calls have occurred, with one more set for this week. Another 12 events have been scheduled, Mr. Speed said. The Washington-based CQE hopes to organize an event for all 56 freshmen in the House of Representatives.

To help organize the calls, CQE is relying on statewide education groups. In most states, that includes the state teachers’ union.

The unions have criticized the NCLB law’s ambitious achievement goals and have joined with other education groups to seek major changes to its accountability measures. (“Views of AFT, NEA on Reauthorization Getting Closer,” March 21, 2007.)

Rep. Timothy J. Walz, D-Minn., a former high school teacher and union member, was scheduled to hear from voters about the NCLB law on April 23.

“He’s supportive of the fact that [the law] has started a dialogue on accountability,” said Meredith A. Salsbery, a spokeswoman for Rep. Walz. “But he obviously has concerns about its punitive measures.”

See Also

For more stories on this topic see No Child Left Behind and our Federal news page.

For background, previous stories, and Web links, read No Child Left Behind.

A version of this article appeared in the April 25, 2007 edition of Education Week

Events

School & District Management Webinar Fostering Productive Relationships Between Principals and Teachers
Strong principal-teacher relationships = happier teachers & thriving schools. Join our webinar for practical strategies.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment
3 Key Strategies for Prepping for State Tests & Building Long-Term Formative Practices
Boost state test success with data-driven strategies. Join our webinar for actionable steps, collaboration tips & funding insights.
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Letter to the Editor The Feds Should Take More Responsibility for Education
A letter to the editor disagrees with former Gov. Jeb Bush's recent opinion essay.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Federal Opinion The Wrong People Are Driving Our Education Policy
School choice advocates don’t understand the full ramifications of draining public resources to benefit private institutions.
Eugene Butler Jr.
4 min read
Moving investments, sending and receiving money, money transfer, Money tree, Growth for trading and investing, reallocating funding from the public sector to the private sector
iStock/Getty Images
Federal Data: Which Ed. Dept. Offices Lost the Most Workers?
Cuts disproportionately hit the agency’s civil rights investigation and research arms, according to an Education Week analysis.
3 min read
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education, which were ordered closed for the day for what officials described as security reasons amid large-scale layoffs, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington. The department this week announced it was shedding half its staff.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Federal Civil Rights, Research, and More: What’s Hit Hardest by Massive Ed. Dept. Cuts
An analysis of the Trump administration's cuts to the agency shows its civil rights enforcement and research arms are hit particularly hard.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Eduction, which were ordered closed for the day for what officials described as security reasons amid large-scale layoffs, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington. The department this week said it was cutting nearly half its staff.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP