Alternative Accrediting Body Gets Recognition

By Michelle Galley — October 08, 2003 3 min read

A maverick accrediting group for teacher education earned its official stripes from the U.S. Department of Education last week, clearing the final hurdle to becoming an alternative for many colleges of education seeking approval for their professional training.

By labeling the group “recognized,” the Education Department essentially put its stamp of approval on the process the Teacher Education Accreditation Council uses to determine which education programs are deemed worthy.

“We’re putting our trust in them,” said Jane Glickman, a department spokeswoman.

The Bush administration’s action, however, did little to assuage the concerns of those who question the way that TEAC operates: It allows colleges to set their own professional standards.

“There is no hospital in the country that defines its own standards in terms of how it is going to be accredited,” said Barnett Berry, the executive director of the Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, based at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Education Department recognition is important for TEAC on a number of levels. Many states require colleges of education to earn accreditation from a group approved by the federal agency.

Moreover, students who attend such schools are eligible to receive federal financial aid.

“It is an important step for TEAC to be seen as acceptable and legitimate,” said Frank B. Murray, the president of the council, which has offices in Washington and Newark, Del.

The timing of the recommendation is crucial, Mr. Murray said. About 30 colleges of education in New York state are attempting to be accredited through TEAC, according to Mr. Murray. They would not have met state requirements if the body had not been recognized.

Those schools “took some risk,” he pointed out.

Until now, colleges of education could be approved only by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, a Washington-based consortium of 33 education groups that has established a rigorous set of standards by which programs are evaluated.

The group conducts a detailed, and expensive, external review of the entire education college, school, or department.

Under the TEAC program, colleges submit what is called an “inquiry brief,” which Mr. Murray describes as a scholarly work that lays out the evidence supporting why a college deserves accreditation. The documentation is then weighed by TEAC to determine its merit.

Since its formation in 1997, TEAC has approved seven programs and has about 100 “in the pipeline,” Mr. Murray said. Aside from the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, all the other colleges accredited by TEAC are small, public and private liberal arts schools

By comparison, of the 1,300 education programs in the country, NCATE has accredited 550; another 120 are pending approval.

In addition, NCATE has formed partnerships with 46 states that base their standards for teacher education programs on the organization’s guidelines.

More Competition?

Supporters of TEAC hailed the federal department’s action for producing more competition in the field.

“It is incredibly important for institutions to have some flexibility and choices about who accredits them,” said Kate Walsh, the executive director of the National Council on Teacher Quality, a Washington group that works to make student achievement the benchmark of teacher quality.

Now that there are two official accrediting organizations, NCATE will improve because “they will have to become more responsive to client criticisms,” she said.

Nothing will change about the way NCATE accredits colleges of education, according to Arthur E. Wise, the group’s president.

He added that aside from nursing, teaching is now the only profession that has more than one accrediting organization.

Having two different organizations with widely divergent standards capable of endorsing colleges of education will do nothing but weaken the profession, Mr. Berry of the Southeast Center for Teaching Quality contended.

“If we wanted to not improve teacher education,” he said, “we couldn’t come up with a better way.”


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Addressing Learning Loss: What Schools Need to Accelerate Reading Instruction in K-3
When K-3 students return to classrooms this fall, there will be huge gaps in foundational reading skills. Does your school or district need a plan to address learning loss and accelerate student growth? In this
Content provided by PDX Reading
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Advance Educational Equity
Schools are welcoming students back into buildings for full-time in-person instruction in a few short weeks and now is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and systems to build
Content provided by PowerMyLearning
Classroom Technology Webinar Making Big Technology Decisions: Advice for District Leaders, Principals, and Teachers
Educators at all levels make decisions that can have a huge impact on students. That’s especially true when it comes to the use of technology, which was activated like never before to help students learn

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Accountability Opinion Absenteeism Is the Wrong Student Engagement Metric to Use Right Now
In a post-pandemic era for school accountability, let’s focus on measuring what matters.
Sara Johnson, Annette Anderson & Ruth R. Faden
4 min read
Figure being erased.
Accountability Biden Education Team Squashes States' Push to Nix All Tests but Approves Other Flexibility
The department has telegraphed its decision to deny states' requests to cancel federally mandated tests for weeks.
3 min read
A first-grader learns keyboarding skills at Bayview Elementary School in San Pablo, Calif on March 12, 2015. Schools around the country are teaching students as young as 6 years old, basic typing and other keyboarding skills. The Common Core education standards adopted by a majority of states call for students to be able to use technology to research, write and give oral presentations, but the imperative for educators arrived with the introduction of standardized tests that are taken on computers instead of with paper and pencils.
The U.S. Department of Education denied some states' requests to cancel standardized tests this year. Others are seeking flexibility from some testing requirements, rather than skipping the assessments altogether.
Eric Risberg/AP
Accountability Explainer Will There Be Standardized Tests This Year? 8 Questions Answered
Educators want to know: Will the exams happen? If so, what will they look like, and how will the results be used?
12 min read
Students testing.
Accountability Opinion What Should School Accountability Look Like in a Time of COVID-19?
Remote learning is not like in person, and after nine months of it, data are revealing how harmful COVID-19 has been to children's learning.
6 min read
Image shows a speech bubble divided into 4 overlapping, connecting parts.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty and Laura Baker/Education Week