Federal

Achievement Up, Growth Rate Down

By Lynn Olson — April 19, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Student achievement has risen under the No Child Left Behind Act, but the academic growth students show over the course of a school year has slowed, particularly for some minority groups, says a new study.

“The Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on Student Achievement and Growth: 2005 Edition,” is posted by the Northwest Evaluation Association. ()

The study was conducted by the nonprofit Northwest Evaluation Association, based in Portland, Ore., using tests it has devised for about 1,500 districts in 43 states. The tests are typically given when students start school in the fall and again in the spring.

The researchers evaluated reading data for more than 320,000 pupils in grades 3-8 in 200-plus districts in 23 states, and mathematics data for more than 334,000 students in the same grades in more than 200 districts in 22 states. They compared achievement scores and fall-to-spring growth in the 2001-02 and the 2003-04 school years. Although broad, the sample is not nationally representative.

In both reading and math, students entering a grade in 2003 had higher beginning test scores than children entering the same grade in 2001, before the NCLB legislation became law. Those gains held true for African-American, Hispanic, and Native American students.

But the rate of growth over the course of a school year slipped between 2001-02 and 2003-04, particularly for minority youngsters. In a comparison of Hispanic and Anglo students with the same initial test score, for instance, Hispanic students’ achievement grew noticeably less over the course of a year.

If those trends continue, the researchers say, states won’t be close to having all students “proficient” on state tests by 2014, as the law requires.

“I certainly wouldn’t suggest that No Child Left Behind is not working, because the evidence would seem to indicate that it is,” said Allan Olson, the NWEA’s executive director.

The study found that achievement levels and growth rates were higher in grades where state tests are given, lending support to the federal law’s requirement for annual testing in grades 3-8.

Events

School & District Management Webinar Fostering Productive Relationships Between Principals and Teachers
Strong principal-teacher relationships = happier teachers & thriving schools. Join our webinar for practical strategies.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment
3 Key Strategies for Prepping for State Tests & Building Long-Term Formative Practices
Boost state test success with data-driven strategies. Join our webinar for actionable steps, collaboration tips & funding insights.
Content provided by Instructure
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Letter to the Editor The Feds Should Take More Responsibility for Education
A letter to the editor disagrees with former Gov. Jeb Bush's recent opinion essay.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Federal Opinion The Wrong People Are Driving Our Education Policy
School choice advocates don’t understand the full ramifications of draining public resources to benefit private institutions.
Eugene Butler Jr.
4 min read
Moving investments, sending and receiving money, money transfer, Money tree, Growth for trading and investing, reallocating funding from the public sector to the private sector
iStock/Getty Images
Federal Data: Which Ed. Dept. Offices Lost the Most Workers?
Cuts disproportionately hit the agency’s civil rights investigation and research arms, according to an Education Week analysis.
3 min read
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education, which were ordered closed for the day for what officials described as security reasons amid large-scale layoffs, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington. The department this week announced it was shedding half its staff.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Federal Civil Rights, Research, and More: What’s Hit Hardest by Massive Ed. Dept. Cuts
An analysis of the Trump administration's cuts to the agency shows its civil rights enforcement and research arms are hit particularly hard.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Eduction, which were ordered closed for the day for what officials described as security reasons amid large-scale layoffs, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington.
Chloe Kienzle of Arlington, Va., holds a sign as she stands outside the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Education on Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in Washington. The department this week said it was cutting nearly half its staff.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP