Student Well-Being

Supreme Court Strikes Down 1996 Ban on Computer-Created Child Pornography

By Mark Walsh — April 24, 2002 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The U.S. Supreme Court last week struck down key provisions of a federal law that criminalized “virtual” child pornography, which includes computer-generated images of children, rather than actual children, engaged in sex.

The court said the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech because no children are harmed in the production of the images defined by the act. And the court majority said the act too broadly covers speech with serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

“The statute proscribes the visual depiction of an idea—that of teenagers engaging in sexual activity—that is a fact of modern society and has been a theme in art and literature throughout the ages,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Case No. 00-795).

The law was challenged by a trade group of the adult-video industry, which disavows child pornography but worried that its films might violate the law. Mainstream Hollywood filmmakers were also concerned that the law might cover depictions of teenagers in sexual situations, even if the actors were young adults.

Justice Kennedy cited such films as “American Beauty,” “Traffic,” and a 1996 version of “Romeo and Juliet” that “explore themes within the wide sweep of the statute’s prohibitions.”

He rejected arguments from the Bush administration that the law should be upheld because pedophiles may use virtual child porn to seduce children, and that it would be harder to prosecute producers of real child pornography without the law.

Mixed Vote

Justice Kennedy’s opinion was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Stephen G. Breyer. Justice Clarence Thomas voted for the same outcome in the case but did not sign Justice Kennedy’s opinion.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor agreed that the government could not ban pornography involving “youthful adults,” making it a 7-2 ruling on that aspect of the case. But she joined with Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia in voting to uphold the provision prohibiting computer-generated images, making that issue a 6-3 ruling.

Chief Justice Rehnquist said the law could be upheld by construing it to ban only visual depictions of “actual sexual activity,” not suggestions of sex, such as scenes of actors “squirming under a blanket.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the April 24, 2002 edition of Education Week as Supreme Court Strikes Down 1996 Ban on Computer-Created Child Pornography

Events

Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Families & the Community Webinar
How Whole-Child Student Data Can Strengthen Family Connections
Learn how district leaders can use these actionable strategies to increase family engagement in their student’s education and boost their academic achievement.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
The School to Workforce Gap: How Are Schools Setting Students Up For Life & Lifestyle Success?
Hear from education and business leaders on how schools are preparing students for their leap into the workforce.
Content provided by Find Your Grind

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Student Well-Being Does SEL Make Students Ready for Work? We Asked Educators
Most educators say SEL has a positive impact on students, but teacher buy-in is still needed.
2 min read
A diverse group of students wearing book bags and climbing ladders and books to assemble a large puzzle
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Student Well-Being Briefly Stated 6 Rules for Engaging Students With Intellectual Disabilities in Sports
Here's how to get started with unified sports, where students with and without intellectual disabilities can play together.
3 min read
Giovannie Tanella, third from left, and Averill Zimmer, share a moment during a Unified Physical Education class at Saratoga Springs High School in Saratoga Springs, N.Y., Thursday, Nov. 3, 2022.
Giovannie Tanella, third from left, and Averill Zimmer, share a moment during a unified physical education class at Saratoga Springs High School in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
Heather Ainsworth for Education Week
Student Well-Being Opinion The Surprising Benefits of Gratitude Everyone Should Know About
Pause and let yourself feel the emotion. It will reap multiple rewards.
David DeSteno
3 min read
Images shows a stylized artistic landscape with soothing colors.
Getty
Student Well-Being Educators Are Bullish on Social-Emotional Learning. Here's Why
Most educators don’t buy the argument that SEL and academics are an either/or proposition.
1 min read
Image of a young student talking with his teacher in a one-on-one conversation.
E+