School Climate & Safety

Student Rights, School Discipline Are at Issue In Off-Campus Dispute

By Mark Walsh — March 20, 1996 3 min read

An off-campus rock-throwing incident in San Marcos, Texas, has turned into an important legal battle over school discipline and the constitutional rights of students.

At issue is a provision in last year’s rewrite of the Texas education code that is designed to keep students suspected of serious off-campus crimes out of regular classrooms.

Nationwide, some school officials have been frustrated to learn they could not prevent students charged with crimes as serious as murder from attending class when the incidents were not school related.

The Texas law provides that “a student shall be removed from class and placed in an alternative education program ... if the student engages in conduct punishable as a felony.”

The law does not require the student to be convicted or even charged with a felony before being removed. It applies if the student has merely been implicated in such a crime.

First Test

Timothy Nevares, a 15-year-old sophomore at San Marcos High School, has become the law’s first legal test. On Jan. 23, Mr. Nevares allegedly threw gravel and rocks at a car and injured a passenger. The driver, who apparently knew Mr. Nevares, reported the incident to police.

Mr. Nevares has not been charged with any crime in connection with the incident, said his lawyer, John Bennett. School officials said they believe the matter is still under review.

Mr. Bennett said Mr. Nevares and a friend were being harassed by the driver of the car as they walked down the street and they threw gravel in self-defense.

A separate Texas law requires police to notify school officials when students are involved in a crime. On Feb. 12, police reported to San Marcos district officials that Mr. Nevares was under investigation for aggravated assault, a felony.

The next day, school officials informed the boy that, as a result, he would be removed from his regular classes and placed in an alternative-education program known as Rebound. The boy’s father, Dan Nevares, sought a hearing on the matter but was told that the law did not authorize one.

The family filed a lawsuit in a state court seeking a temporary injunction and challenging the constitutionality of the law. The school district had the case moved to U.S. District Court in Austin.

On March 1, U.S. District Judge James R. Nowlin granted the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary injunction barring the removal of the boy from his regular classroom. The judge also issued a preliminary ruling on the merits of the case that has worried state officials and school district lawyers.

‘A Form of Punishment’

Judge Nowlin said the Nevareses have a substantial likelihood of winning their claim that the law violates their son’s 14th Amendment right to due process.

In its requirement that school officials immediately place a student suspected of off-campus felonies in alternative education, the law contains no provision for the student to receive notice or a hearing, the judge wrote.

He cited a 1975 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that students facing suspensions of up to 10 days be given at least minimal notice and hearing procedures. In that ruling, Goss v. Lopez, the high court said students have protected property and liberty interests in public education that merit the protection of due process of law.

Judge Nowlin ruled, on a preliminary basis, that the Supreme Court’s standard in that case applies to alternative placements.

“Removal of a student from regular high school classes for placement in alternative education is a form of punishment,” he wrote.

The judge’s ruling concerned some legal experts and state lawmakers, who fear it could lead to more legal challenges to student-discipline decisions.

“We are not denying this young man his constitutional right to a free public education,” said State Rep. Ric Williamson, who helped write the provision. “We are regulating the setting. Due process does not apply to where the child is placed.”

Mr. Nevares’ lawyer disagreed.

Timothy Nevares has been an A and B student who has never been in trouble at school, Mr. Bennett said. Suddenly, without any charges filed, school officials want to place him in a disciplinary program with “all the little badasses,” he said.

“So is that constitutional?” he asked. “Can you punish someone like this based on an accusation alone?”

The Texas Education Agency, the Texas Association of School Boards, and other groups plan to file briefs with Judge Nowlin opposing his preliminary ruling. A final ruling is likely to be several months away.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Here to Stay – Pandemic Lessons for EdTech in Future Development
What technology is needed in a post pandemic district? Learn how changes in education will impact development of new technologies.
Content provided by AWS
School & District Management Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Strategies & Tips for Complex Decision-Making
Schools are working through the most disruptive period in the history of modern education, facing a pandemic, economic problems, social justice issues, and rapid technological change all at once. But even after the pandemic ends,

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Climate & Safety As States Fall Short on Tracking Discipline, Concerns for Equity Grow
Pandemic upheavals have left a majority of states with holes in their data about discipline in schools, potentially worsening disparities.
4 min read
Image of a student sitting outside of a doorway.
DigitalVision
School Climate & Safety Proms During COVID-19: 'Un-Proms', 'Non-Proms', and Masquerades
High school proms are back in this second spring of COVID-19, though they may not look much like the traditional, pre-pandemic versions.
7 min read
Affton Missouri UnProm
Affton High School students attend a drive-in theater "un-prom" in Missouri on April 18.
Photo Courtesy of Deann Myers
School Climate & Safety Opinion 5 Things to Expect When Schools Return to In-Person Learning
Many schools are just coming back to in-person learning. There are five issues all school communities should anticipate when that happens.
Matt Fleming
5 min read
shutterstock 1051475696
Shutterstock
School Climate & Safety What the Research Says 'High-Surveillance' Schools Lead to More Suspensions, Lower Achievement
Cameras, drug sweeps, and other surveillance increase exclusionary discipline, regardless of actual student misbehavior, new research finds.
5 min read
New research suggests such surveillance systems may increase discipline disparities.
Motortion/iStock/Getty