Student Well-Being

Statements to School Counselor Not Protected, Mich. Court Rules

By Mark Walsh — February 27, 2002 2 min read

Statements made by two male high school students to a school counselor about the sexual assault of a female student were not protected by teacher-student confidentiality, a Michigan appeals court has ruled.

The Feb. 8 ruling by a three-judge panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals concerned two of four former River Rouge High School football players charged in the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl in 2000.

A state trial-court judge had suppressed the statements made by Lamar Toney, who was 17 at the time of the assault, and Justine Garrett, who was 16, in front of a school counselor in the 2,700-student River Rouge district.

The judge ruled the statements were coerced because the students were ordered to report to the counselor’s office, and they were not given so-called Miranda warnings before they spoke.

But the appeals court held that the counselor was not acting as an agent of the police, and therefore was not required to give the young men, who voluntarily discussed the incident, the warnings required under the landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision on apprising criminal suspects of their rights.

And while Michigan law establishes a privilege for teacher-student communication that includes school counselors, it “protects only confidential communications,” the appeals court said.

The two defendants discussed the incident with the counselor when other students and an administrative assistant were present, so the communication was not confidential, the court held.

Levels of Confidentiality

Students’ conversations with school counselors are generally confidential, except when there are legal considerations, said Richard Wong, the executive director of the American School Counselor Association, based in Alexandria, Va.

“We do recognize that confidentiality is not held at the same level” as that of a physician and patient, for example, said Mr. Wong.

The Michigan appellate court’s decision was unpublished, which means that it cannot be cited in future cases as a precedent.

But even so, the decision does not seem out of line with similar rulings elsewhere in the country, said Edwin Darden, a senior staff lawyer with the National School Boards Association, based in Alexandria, Va.

“Even though it is a local case, it seems to be pretty consistent with the principles that go on in school discipline cases nationwide,” he said.

According to the Michigan court’s opinion, the school counselor called both defendants’ parents in an effort to protect the defendants “from making further incriminating statements.” And there is no evidence that the questioning was prolonged or provoked, the court said.

The four former football players pleaded guilty in December to a lesser charge of assault with intent to do great bodily harm. They were sentenced to probation and eight months at a “boot camp” correctional program.

A spokeswoman for the Wayne County prosecutor’s office said she did not believe the appeals court ruling would affect the plea agreement.

The Court of Appeals is not the state’s highest court, but it was unclear last week whether the ruling would be appealed to the state supreme court.

A version of this article appeared in the February 27, 2002 edition of Education Week as Statements to School Counselor Not Protected, Mich. Court Rules

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Building Equitable Systems: Moving Math From Gatekeeper to Opportunity Gateway
The importance of disrupting traditional American math practices and adopting high-quality math curriculum continues to be essential for changing the trajectory of historically under-resourced schools. Building systems around high-quality math curriculum also is necessary to
Content provided by Partnership for L.A. Schools
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by Learning.com

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Quiz
Quiz Yourself: How Much Do You Know About Using The American Rescue Plan Act to Support Hybrid-Learning?
Quiz Yourself: How well do you know the American Rescue Plan?
Content provided by ConexED Logo
Student Well-Being Opinion Why Venting When You Have Problems Feels Good—and Why It Doesn’t Work
When you keep talking about what’s bothering you, it keeps the negative emotions alive. Here’s what research says to do instead.
Ethan Kross
2 min read
Images shows a stylized artistic landscape with soothing colors.
Getty
Student Well-Being What the Research Says How Does Sending a Child to School Change a Family's Risk of COVID-19?
In-person schooling that doesn't lead to outbreaks can still raise the risk of kids bringing the virus home, especially in poor families.
3 min read
On Sept. 24, 2020, distance learners are seen on a laptop held by teacher Kristen Giuliano who assists student Jane Wood, 11, in a seventh-grade social studies class at Dodd Middle School in Cheshire, Conn. A new study finds a family's risk of infection rose if they had a school-age student when schools re-started in person instruction.
Students, assisted by their teacher Kristen Giuliano, work remotely and in-person in a hybrid classroom earlier this year at Dodd Middle School in Cheshire, Conn.
Dave Zajac/Record-Journal via AP
Student Well-Being Teens Are Starting to Get Vaccinated. That's a Big Deal for Schools
Educators are now encouraging their oldest students to get the vaccine, with the hope that it will help normalize school operations.
10 min read
17-year-old cancer survivor Jordan Loughan receives a Pfizer vaccination at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on Tuesday, March 23, 2021.
Seventeen-year-old cancer survivor Jordan Loughan receives a Pfizer vaccination for COVID-19 in Atlanta on March 23.
Curtis Compton/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP