Opinion
Student Well-Being & Movement Opinion

Children on Meds

By Emily H. Jones — July 28, 2009 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The enormous benefit for educators in the new brain research is being counteracted by an equally enormous surge in prescribing medications destined for the brains of children we are trying to educate.

Drug companies are rushing to fill the marketplace with psychotherapeutic drugs for every syndrome and ailment that can be given a name or initials. Children are now given “meds” for sleeping, for attention, for mood, for anxiety. The vast majority of these prescribed drugs are used “off label”—they have not been tested or approved for use by children and adolescents.

Doctors readily admit that they don’t know exactly how many of these drugs work, and parents are told, “Let’s try this, and if it doesn’t work, we’ll try something else.” Meanwhile, college students and adults without diagnoses are using illicit prescription drugs in an effort to enhance their cognitive functions.

The major task of childhood and adolescence has always been to learn one’s self—to learn how to self-regulate, gain self-control, self-monitor. It is the time to learn how to focus, how to cheer one’s self up, how to control anxiety, how to get a good night’s sleep. Nobody is born knowing these things, and learning them can often be hard. New research is helping us understand what attention actually is and how to develop it, how moods are formed and changed, how the brain’s “plasticity” makes it possible to overcome many previously intractable problems.

Some people never can overcome these problems on their own, and new drugs may be an enormous benefit to those few. But if children are given drugs because self-regulation has not yet been learned, rather than because they cannot learn it, they are being robbed of the chance to grow up whole. We too often try to substitute drugs for genuine maturity, which comes only with effort and experience.

The brain is not fully formed until we reach our early 20s, and it remains plastic, able to change, throughout life. The prospect of putting powerful drugs into that growing brain is wrong from a number of standpoints. First, the effect on development is totally unknown. Second, although parents may think they are giving their child “every advantage” with medication, the child often gets the message that he or she is flawed. Finally, the job of teaching becomes much more complicated trying to understand and help children with medicated minds.

Schools must urge parents to be patient with their children—and must themselves be patient. It has to be OK for children to be different, even troublesome. It must be OK for adolescents to struggle, to take time to learn to be their own masters. Schools must allow students train their own minds, and help them understand their capacity to do so.

There are of course situations in which a severe mental illness has to be treated with medication so that a child can live a full and happy life. And when these medical miracles happen, it is wonderful to see. But such cases are relatively rare compared with the tens of thousands of prescription drugs that are being fed to American children every day.

If we want our children to grow up knowing, liking, and being responsible for themselves, they must be allowed, literally, to be themselves.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the August 12, 2009 edition of Education Week as Children on Meds

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Portrait of a Learner: From Vision to Districtwide Practice
Learn how one district turned Portrait of a Learner into an aligned, systemwide practice that sticks.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Student Well-Being & Movement Then & Now Schools and 'Family Values': A Reboot of a Familiar Debate
The "success sequence" is the latest in a long line of proposals to have schools take up responsible decisionmaking.
5 min read
Illustration using a wedding cake in the foreground, and in the background is an image of Candice Bergen, who plays the role of a single parent on the television comedy series "Murphy Brown," relaxes on the set of her Emmy-winning show during a live broadcast of the CBS "This Morning" show, Sept. 21, 1992. Bergen's character will return to her TV news anchor job and will respond to Dan Quayle's remark about glamorizing single motherhood when the show resumes its new season. (Chris Martinez/AP)
Some states want schools to teach students that they have a better shot at success if they work, get married, and have a child—in that order. Debates about these "family values" have evolved and resurfaced over the years. One firestorm happened in 1992, when TV character Murphy Brown of the eponymous comedy series, played by Candice Bergen, became a single parent—a development criticized by then-Vice President Dan Quayle as an example of "glamorizing" single motherhood.
Illustration by Education Week via Chris Martinez/AP + Canva
Student Well-Being & Movement School Counselors’ Jobs Are Misunderstood. Why It Matters
New report examines the challenges school counselors are facing and how to address them.
4 min read
School counselor Laurinda Culpepper takes down student's work on a bulletin board at Walnut Grove Elementary School, on May 13, 2020, in Olathe, Kan. Teachers were gathering belongings and classwork of students students so they could be picked up by parents the following week. The school was closed on March 13 and all Kansas schools were eventually ordered shut for the remainder of the school year to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
School counselor Laurinda Culpepper takes down students' work on a bulletin board at Walnut Grove Elementary School, on May 13, 2020, in Olathe, Kan. According to the American School Counselor Association’s State of the Profession 2025 report, many people who do not work in schools do not understand the role and value counselors have for school communities.
Charlie Riedel/AP
Student Well-Being & Movement Parents and Kids Feel Shut Out of Policymaking. What Schools Should Know
New survey reveals parents and kids want more voice in government decisions.
4 min read
Students from Columbus, Ohio, wait outside a barrier as U.S. Capitol Police watch over the East Plaza where congressional leaders will have a news conferences on the government shutdown at the Capitol in Washington, on Oct. 15, 2025.
Students from Columbus, Ohio, wait outside a barrier at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, where congressional leaders were having a news conference about the federal government shutdown on Oct. 15, 2025. A new survey shows students want more of a voice in shaping government decisions.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Student Well-Being & Movement Jury Finds Meta Platforms Harm Children. Why School Districts Are Eyeing This Verdict
A trial scheduled for this summer pits school districts against social media companies.
6 min read
Attorneys representing the state and those representing meta speak following the verdict where the jury found Meta willfully violated New Mexico's consumer protection laws, Tuesday, March 24, 2026 , in Santa Fe, N.M.
Attorneys representing New Mexico and those working for Meta talk following a verdict that found the social media company willfully violated New Mexico's consumer protection laws, on March 24, 2026, in Santa Fe, N.M. Schools have been paying increasing attention to how the use of social media can harm students.
Nathan Burton/Santa Fe New Mexican via AP, Pool