Opinion
Equity & Diversity Opinion

3 Reasons Your District Needs a Theory of Change for Equity Work

The opportunity many equity leaders are missing
By Terrance L. Green — December 05, 2022 4 min read
House surrounded by trees under dark night sky. Movement of stars around pole star on north hemisphere. Star trails on night sky, long exposure composition
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

We are still living in the shadows of COVID-19, the ongoing manifestations of anti-Black racism, and policy efforts to remove truth telling about America’s history in schools. Despite these efforts to undermine racial-justice work, many school districts are continuing to prioritize equity and anti-racism. Yet, many of these same districts struggle with finding a way to organize the multiple aspects of their work and to strategically weather the racist and political winds that are constantly blowing.

As districts throughout the country accelerate their hiring of P-12 chief equity officers and other equity positions, it’s important that districts and their equity leaders develop a theory of change that will anchor and guide their work.

Without a theory of change—the explanation of how a course of action will lead to a specific change—districts can run the risk of having their racial-justice and equity work become disorganized, shallow, and performative.

See Also

111622 opinion 14Irby equity director 1174940279
iStock/Getty
Equity & Diversity Opinion The Real Value of Equity Directors for Districts
Decoteau J. Irby, November 17, 2022
6 min read

Leaders across a variety of fields use theories of change to guide collaborative planning, strategic decisionmaking, actions, and critical reflection among a diverse group of stakeholders. These theories of change, typically written as IF, THEN statements, clarify essential indicators, intermediate steps, and various paths that, for example, racial-justice change can take. Importantly, they start by acknowledging context—the racial, historical, and political.

A district’s theory of change might be: If we center the perspectives, decisions, and lived experiences of Black youth, adults, and communities, then we will create more authentic, equity-centered, and racially affirming partnerships with families.

Even though equity, anti-racism, and racial-justice efforts have accelerated in some districts, research that I have conducted with Ann Ishimaru of the University of Washington and Decoteau Irby of the University of Illinois at Chicago suggests that only a small number of district-level equity leaders have a theory of change. In fact, in early 2022, at a convening of 40 district-level equity officers, only one of the leaders had a theory of change to guide their work.

That’s a missed opportunity.

Here are three positive outcomes that equity leaders can achieve by developing a theory of change:

1. Generate racially-just north stars.

School districts often frame their work around quantifiable outcomes, such as test scores or graduation rates. While measurable goals are important, they are not robust enough to radically and fundamentally remake schools into places of racial justice. Instead, schools must have what scholar and author Bettina Love refers to as “north stars” (based on how enslaved African Americans used the stars to guide their journeys toward freedom in the days of chattel slavery).

When school districts sit down to articulate the theory of change behind equity efforts, they can create these north stars. Leaders should start by collaborating with Black and other racially minoritized youth, families, and communities to reimagine the multitude of possibilities.

To do so, district leadership should grapple with questions like:

  • How might our school district look, feel, be experienced, and sound when racial justice, radical love for Black life, and anti-oppression is an everyday reality?
  • How might we know when racial justice is embedded throughout everything that we do in our district?

As districts grapple with these and other questions, then they can use their north stars as mediums through which to guide equity-based decisions, approaches, policies, and practices.

2. Foster solidarity with Black youth and families.

There are many different fronts for equity work, which can create both wonderful opportunities and incoherence. To help bring clear alignment, a theory of change will name and invite people to grapple with racist assumptions, status quo thinking, and white-supremacist organizational norms, as well as race-evasive practices. I define race evasive as diversity initiatives that fail to confront racism or take a “race neutral” approach that fails to acknowledge the influence of race on education policies like curriculum and hiring.

Equity directors and other members of district leadership must work honestly through these dynamics to include Black youth and families as key decisionmakers.

Of course, everyone in the district will not always be in solidarity with racial-justice work. That is a reality but should not stall your work. We must foster solidarity with Black youth and families to confront racism because school districts in the United States are founded on, and often continue to perpetuate, settler colonialism, anti-Blackness, and systemic racism. But it is crucial for the people who are doing this work to have collective solidarity.

3. Dismantle and rebuild systems.

One of my favorite quotes from historian Robin D.G. Kelley is, “Without new visions, we don’t know what to build, only what to knock down.” Although a theory of change will help districts clarify the root causes of problems such as anti-Blackness and structural racism that need to be dismantled, it will equally importantly bring people back to the question, “What are we building?” While a lot of justice work can be consumed with putting out fires and navigating racist systems, we have to keep building racially-just systems as we work to dismantle the status quo. It’s imperative that we build racially just systems in professional learning, assessments, teaching and learning, hiring, family engagement, and how students and teachers are assigned to specific programs.

Racial-just work in districts is not easy. But with a theory of change, district equity leaders can feel more prepared and ready to navigate their work more strategically.

Related Tags:

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
Future-Proofing Your School's Tech Ecosystem: Strategies for Asset Tracking, Sustainability, and Budget Optimization
Gain actionable insights into effective asset management, budget optimization, and sustainable IT practices.
Content provided by Follett Learning
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
Innovative Funding Models: A Deep Dive into Public-Private Partnerships
Discover how innovative funding models drive educational projects forward. Join us for insights into effective PPP implementation.
Content provided by Follett Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Opinion 70 Years of Abandonment: The Failed Promise of 'Brown v. Board'
If the nation is going to refuse integration, Black people must demand we revisit the separate but equal doctrine, writes Bettina L. Love.
4 min read
A Black student is isolated from their classmates by an aisle in the classroom.
Xia Gordon for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion 'Brown v. Board of Education' at 70: A Dream Dissolved
This anniversary should remind us that progress is not inevitable. We stand now at a critical juncture.
R. L’Heureux Lewis-McCoy
4 min read
A young Black woman's image dissolves in the smoke.
iStock/Getty Images
Equity & Diversity Opinion Equity? Equality? How Educators Can Tell the Difference
Educators offer advice and examples for giving students what they need, rather than simply treating everyone the same.
10 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Equity & Diversity Judge Says State Can't Block Teachers From Discussing Critical Race Theory
The rule stops short of more broadly blocking Arkansas from enforcing its ban on certain topics.
2 min read
Students make their way into Little Rock Central High School on Aug. 24, 2020, for the first day of classes in the Little Rock School District. A federal judge ruled, Tuesday, May 7, 2024, that Arkansas cannot prevent two high school teachers from discussing critical race theory in the classroom, but stopped short of more broadly blocking the state from enforcing its ban on “indoctrination” in public schools. The prohibition is being challenged by two teachers and two students at Little Rock Central High School, site of the 1957 desegregation crisis.
Students make their way into Little Rock Central High School in Little Rock, Ark., on Aug. 24, 2020, for the first day of classes.
Tommy Metthe/Arkansas Democrat-Gazette via AP