School Climate & Safety

Formula Targets Building Funds to Neediest Districts

By Joetta L. Sack — March 26, 1997 3 min read


The Department of Education unveiled legislation last week to target half of its proposed $5 billion for school construction on the 100 school districts with the greatest number of students living in poverty.

The proposed formula, which is based on the grant formula under the Title I remedial education program, would earmark $2.45 billion for the neediest school systems.

Districts could use the federal money to pay up to half of the interest on school construction bonds. The grants could go toward making repairs, upgrading technology, eliminating hazardous substances, making buildings accessible to special populations, or building new structures.

The plan will likely sound great to school administrators in resource-strapped districts. But there’s a catch: Those districts must first persuade voters to pass a bond issue to finance the construction costs.

“If a county didn’t go forward with bonds, then obviously this wouldn’t help,” said Marshall S. Smith, the acting deputy education secretary.

‘Help a Great Deal’

Education Department officials said the proposal, which would give districts four years to take advantage of the interest aid, could spur voters to pass a bond referendum for projects that had been put off.

Under the plan, another $50 million would go to American Indian reservations and U.S. territories. States would receive the remaining $2.5 billion in interest aid to award to districts that they deem the neediest.

Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley said the federal government would form a partnership with districts to “jump-start” badly needed construction.

“This will not solve the entire problem, and was not intended to do that,” he said. “But it will help a great deal.”

The Education Department estimates that the proposal would affect 4 million students.

According to a 1995 report by the General Accounting Office, about 14 million students attend schools that need extensive repairs or replacement.

The plan, S 456, was introduced in the Senate last week by Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun, D-Ill.

In the House, Reps. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., and Joseph P. Kennedy II, D-Mass., introduced the counterpart bill, HR 1104.

Sen. Moseley-Braun said the initiative was needed to ensure students have the resources to successfully train to enter the workforce.

“By investing in bricks and mortar, the federal government can contribute to a more balanced partnership among all levels of government to rebuild and modernize our schools to serve all children in the 21st century,” she said in introducing the bill.

Mr. Riley insists that the proposal would not impose any new regulations on schools.

But Republican lawmakers have warned that labor laws that apply to federally financed construction projects could drive up the cost of work done under the proposed program. (“President’s School Construction Plan Debated,” March 19, 1997.)

‘National Problem’

Mr. Riley said the “baby boom echo” that is swelling school enrollments has heightened the need to spend more money on school construction and repairs.

Before injuring his knee during a visit to Florida earlier this month, President Clinton had planned a stop in Broward County, Fla., which has been dubbed the “portable capital of the world” because of its problems with overcrowding.

About 10,000 new students enter the county’s schools each year.

Despite building 36 schools in the past nine years, the county still uses about 2,000 portable classrooms, according to the federal Education Department.

Shortly before returning to Washington, Mr. Clinton defended the plan against critics who assert that it would drive up overall costs.

“Underinvestment in school infrastructure has become a national problem, and it demands national action,” he said. “We simply cannot ask our teachers to build up children in buildings that are falling down.”

Education Department officials emphasized that students have higher academic achievement in school facilities that are in good condition.

They cited several studies that found pupils in poorly maintained schools had lower academic performance than those in top-quality buildings.

While the proposal would not solve all the problems, education leaders said it zeroes in on a situation that has received inadequate attention.

“It’s probably not enough, but at least it calls attention to the need that we have,” said Carole Kennedy, the president of the National Association of Elementary School Principals.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy to Advance Educational Equity
Schools are welcoming students back into buildings for full-time in-person instruction in a few short weeks and now is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and systems to build
Content provided by PowerMyLearning
Classroom Technology Webinar Making Big Technology Decisions: Advice for District Leaders, Principals, and Teachers
Educators at all levels make decisions that can have a huge impact on students. That’s especially true when it comes to the use of technology, which was activated like never before to help students learn
Professional Development Webinar Expand Digital Learning by Expanding Teacher Training
This discussion will examine how things have changed and offer guidance on smart, cost-effective ways to expand digital learning efforts and train teachers to maximize the use of new technologies for learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Climate & Safety Opinion The Police-Free Schools Movement Made Headway. Has It Lost Momentum?
Removing officers from school hallways plays just one small part in taking down the school policing system.
Judith Browne Dianis
4 min read
Image of lights on police cruiser
School Climate & Safety Spotlight Spotlight on Safe Reopening
In this Spotlight, review how your district can strategically apply its funding, and how to help students safely bounce back, plus more.

School Climate & Safety Video A Year of Activism: Students Reflect on Their Fight for Racial Justice at School
Education Week talks to three students about their year of racial justice activism, what they learned, and where they are headed next.
4 min read
Tay Andwerson, front center, Denver School Board at-large director, leads demonstrators through Civic Center Park on a march to City Park to call for more oversight of the police Sunday, June 7, 2020, in Denver.
Tay Andwerson, front center, Denver School Board at-large director, leads demonstrators through Civic Center Park on a march to City Park to call for more oversight of the police Sunday, June 7, 2020, in Denver.
David Zalubowski/AP
School Climate & Safety Interactive Which Districts Have Cut School Policing Programs?
Which districts have taken steps to reduce their school policing programs or eliminate SRO positions? And what do those districts' demographics look like? Find out with Education Week's new interactive database.
A police officer walks down a hall inside a school
Collage by Vanessa Solis/Education Week (images: Michael Blann/Digital/Vision; Kristen Prahl/iStock/Getty Images Plus )