School Climate & Safety

Bills Differ on Federal Role In Hate-Crimes Prevention

By Erik W. Robelen — October 31, 2001 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Hate crimes, which have been getting heightened attention since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, have found their way into this year’s congressional debate over education. At the behest of some conservatives, the House version of a bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act would eliminate language in current law that authorizes the Department of Education to issue grants specifically for hate-crimes prevention. The Senate version of the bill would continue to allow the department to fund such grants.

The House position, written into that chamber’s bill last spring, has now prompted an outcry from more than 100 organizations, including education groups, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Arab American Institute.

“In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, some people have irrationally targeted their fellow Americans and others who appear to be of Muslim, Middle Eastern, or South Asian descent ... for violence,” the groups wrote in an Oct. 16 letter to Congress.

“Especially at this time,” the letter says, “we urge the conference committee to act to strengthen our nation’s core values of equality and respect for the individual by deferring to the Senate language on this matter—and retain the Department of Education’s existing authority to assist schools and local communities in developing and implementing these critical anti-violence and bias crime prevention initiatives.”

The issue arises as conferees from the House and the Senate are seeking to reconcile their respective versions of the ESEA. As of last week, congressional aides said no agreement had been reached on the hate- crimes provisions.

A Clash of Values

Some conservatives, citing what they say are philosophical objections to singling out offenses against members of certain groups as “hate” crimes, say there shouldn’t be any federal support for educational initiatives on the subject.

“The whole definition or category has concerned us,” said Jennifer A. Marshall, the director of family studies at the Family Research Council in Washington. “We believe that all crimes are crimes of hate.”

Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., a member of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, said he would prefer that the Senate language be removed.

“A lot of this revolves around homosexuality,” he said. “Many of the [educational] documents in effect try to preach acceptance of homosexuality as a lifestyle.” He said that troubles those who believe homosexuality is a sin.

But Mr. Souder acknowledged that it would be difficult for conservatives to prevail in the ESEA debate. He suggested that ultimately the two sides might compromise by retaining the Senate’s hate-crime provisions while adding House language designed to assuage some of the conservatives’ objections by including a “religious protection.”

The House language—modeled after a similar provision in juvenile-justice legislation, Mr. Souder said—stipulates that “the development of educational programs that prevent school-based crime, including crimes motivated by hate ... and any published materials that address school-based crime shall not recommend or require any action that abridges or infringes upon the constitutionally protected rights of free speech, religion, and equal protection of students, their parents, or legal guardians.”

That language “at least attempts to address my major concern,” Mr. Souder said. “People can in fact differ on homosexuality without differing on hate.”

Nancy M. Zirkin, the director of government relations for the Washington-based American Association of University Women, said she has no particular objection to the House language, as long as the Senate provisions also remain.

The constitutional protections “would [apply] to any law that anyone would enact,” she said.

While the Department of Education has provided some money for activities intended to prevent hate crimes, its role has been fairly limited. For example, the department issued seven grants for a total of $1.8 million in 1996 to address escalating ethnic and racial conflicts.

In 1999, the department issued a guide for schools on protecting students from harassment and hate crimes.

Last year, the Justice and Education departments jointly provided a $1 million grant to form Partners Against Hate, an information clearinghouse on preventing hate crimes.

Related Tags:


Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School Climate & Safety Opinion Should Classroom Discipline Be Based in ‘Restorative Justice’?
Discipline often divides conservatives and liberals. Is there room for common ground?
9 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School Climate & Safety Do Cellphone Bans Work? Educators Share Their Experiences
Educators describe how policies banning cellphones at school are affecting students and learning.
6 min read
Photo illustration of cell phone with red circle and slash.
iStock / Getty Images Plus
School Climate & Safety Disparities, Bullying, and Corporal Punishment: The Latest Federal Discipline Data
As most schools offered hybrid instruction in 2020-21, Black students and students with disabilities were disproportionately disciplined.
5 min read
The image displays a lonely teenage boy facing away from the camera, sitting on the curb in front of his high school.
Discipline data from the 2020-21 pandemic era, released by the U.S. Department of Education, shows persisting disparities in discipline based on race and disability status.
School Climate & Safety From Our Research Center Where Should Students Be Allowed to Use Cellphones? Here’s What Educators Say
There’s a yawning gap between what's permitted and what educators feel should be allowed.
2 min read
Tight crop photo of a student looking at their cellphone during class. The background is blurred, but shows students wearing uniforms.