News in Brief

Pledge of Allegiance Debate Heard by Federal Court

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A federal appellate panel heard arguments this month in a case challenging a New Hampshire law that requires schools to reserve time each day for students to voluntarily recite the Pledge of Allegiance. As with a pending California case, the lawsuit takes issue with the words “under God.”

A federal district court upheld the New Hampshire statute in February, ruling that the law has the permissible secular effect of “teaching our country’s history to the elementary and secondary pupils of this state,” and that it does not have the effect of coercing children to support or participate in religion.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation appealed and enlisted longtime pledge challenger Michael A. Newdow to argue its case. A separate appellate panel ruled against Dr. Newdow, a lawyer and physician, last spring when he challenged school-led recitations of the pledge as unconstitutional establishment of religion. Dr. Newdow previously led a challenge to the pledge at his daughter’s school, a case the U.S. Supreme Court disposed of on procedural grounds.

Vol. 30, Issue 04, Page 4

Published in Print: September 22, 2010, as Pledge of Allegiance Debate Heard by Federal Court
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories