Standards & Accountability

NCAA Boosts Scrutiny of ‘Nontraditional’ High Schools

By Andrew Trotter — May 09, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Responding to recent news stories about star college athletes with fraudulent or sketchy high school qualifications, the National Collegiate Athletic Association is sharpening its scrutiny of high school programs that are not under the purview of accreditation agencies or other authorities.

Steps announced April 27 by the Indianapolis-based governing body for intercollegiate sports include a review of “nontraditional” high schools, including some charter schools and schools that operate only online, and closer scrutiny of the records of high school students who make dramatic academic improvement over a short period.

“We’re less concerned about the method of delivery. … We’re really concerned about the level of teaching,” Kevin C. Lennon, the NCAA’s vice president for membership services, said in an interview. “When you have students not going to class at all and earning grades, that’s something you have to shut down.”

NCAA President Myles Brand has said recently that fraud in high school records is increasing. He also said that there would be “no amnesty” for current high school seniors from the association’s stricter scrutiny of questionable schools.

But Mr. Lennon clarified that the NCAA is not going to be targeting schools that are simply low-performing.

“We’re not going to be worried about a high school that currently meets state requirements, has oversight at the state level, or is approved by a regional accrediting agency,” he said.

Oversight Issues

Media reports in recent months found that several preparatory high schools that are primarily attended by athletes operate with little or no oversight from accreditation agencies, state departments of education, or school districts.

One school examined by The New York Times, University High School, was an unaccredited correspondence program based in Miami that reportedly had no classes or teachers, yet awarded high grades to high school athletes who enrolled in the program as seniors and went on to play college sports. The school has closed since the story was published in November.

University High and other schools about which questions have been raised offered courses that were approved by the NCAA Clearinghouse for determining student-athletes’ initial eligibility to play college sports and receive athletic scholarships from NCAA Division I and II institutions.

One action approved late last month by the committees of college presidents and chancellors for the NCAA’s Division I and II institutions is a request for information to more than 40 schools that are not accredited or subject to oversight by school districts.

Schools that do not meet the association’s standards may be removed from its list of providers of courses that qualify high school applicants for initial athletic eligibility. Before that step, however, the schools would be entitled to defend themselves in an appeals process.

Test-Score Reporting

Among the red flags that will now draw increased scrutiny to schools from the NCAA: students completing in one semester an “abnormally large number of classes,” Mr. Lennon said; a school allowing students to take courses simultaneously that normally are sequential, such as Algebra 1 and 2; a school offering a diploma for a flat fee; or one offering many more courses than the size of its faculty would warrant.

Mr. Lennon added that the NCAA contacted three schools in January and February after revelations in the news media, primarily The New York Times and The Washington Post, and when the schools did not respond, the association removed their courses from its list.

Another way that the NCAA plans to tighten its procedures is by only receiving the ACT or SAT scores of athletes directly from the test agencies. Eligibility requires a minimum score on one of those college-entrance tests. In recent years, the association clearinghouse has accepted handwritten scores from school personnel, Mr. Lennon said.

Mr. Lennon emphasized, however, that admissions offices and accrediting agencies also need to help address bogus high school credentials, a problem that goes beyond eligibility for college athletics. High schools can help by counseling their athletes to avoid shopping among schools as a remedy for poor grades, he said.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the May 10, 2006 edition of Education Week as NCAA Boosts Scrutiny of ‘Nontraditional’ High Schools

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Smarter Tools, Stronger Outcomes: Empowering CTE Educators With Future-Ready Solutions
Open doors to meaningful, hands-on careers with research-backed insights, ideas, and examples of successful CTE programs.
Content provided by Pearson
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Recalibrating PLCs for Student Growth in the New Year
Get advice from K-12 leaders on resetting your PLCs for spring by utilizing winter assessment data and aligning PLC work with MTSS cycles.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards & Accountability Opinion Student Test Scores Keep Falling. What’s Really to Blame?
There’s strong circumstantial evidence pointing to a particular culprit. (Hint: It’s not the pandemic.)
Martin R. West
5 min read
A stylized, faceless student has a smooth, open head with a glowing smartphone rising from it, symbolizing the smart phone and social media's impact on NAEP scores.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty Images
Standards & Accountability How Teachers in This District Pushed to Have Students Spend Less Time Testing
An agreement a teachers' union reached with the district reduces locally required testing while keeping in place state-required exams.
6 min read
Standardized test answer sheet on school desk.
E+
Standards & Accountability Opinion Do We Know How to Measure School Quality?
Current rating systems could be vastly improved by adding dimensions beyond test scores.
Van Schoales
6 min read
Benchmark performance, key performance indicator measurement, KPI analysis. Tiny people measure length of market chart bars with big ruler to check profit progress cartoon vector illustration
iStock/Getty Images
Standards & Accountability States Are Testing How Much Leeway They Can Get From Trump's Ed. Dept.
A provision in the Every Student Succeeds Act allows the secretary of education to waive certain state requirements.
7 min read
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
Ben Curtis/AP