Effort To Overturn Costly Yonkers Ruling Advances

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

State and municipal officials have won a key victory in their attempt to overturn a federal court order requiring costly and far-reaching educational changes in Yonkers, N.Y., aimed at raising achievement among black and Hispanic students.

A federal appeals panel ruled late last month that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the city school district had failed to prove that racial disparities in test scores stemmed from past segregation.

The June 22 ruling in U.S. v. Yonkers Board of Education increases the likelihood that the state and the city of Yonkers will avoid having to comply with lower-court rulings in 1997 and 1998 requiring them to pay for school initiatives costing a projected $560 million over nine years, not including sizable related capital costs.

NAACP Argument Rejected

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, based in New York City, did not buy the lower court's conclusion that the programs were needed to remedy the lingering effects of deliberate racial segregation, which the schools were originally ordered to correct in 1985.

The NAACP, backed by school officials, had argued that because of past segregation, teachers expected less from minority students and were unresponsive to their cultural differences.

Suggesting that the achievement gap might stem from any number of other factors, including racism in society at large, the appeals panel threw out the remedial order as unwarranted.

Vol. 18, Issue 42, Page 3

Published in Print: July 14, 1999, as Effort To Overturn Costly Yonkers Ruling Advances
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories