Education

Testing Places Only a ‘Modest’ Burden On Students, G.A.O. Report Concludes

By Robert Rothman — February 03, 1993 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

WASHINGTON--Despite fears that American students are “overtested,’' testing places only a “modest’’ burden of time on schools and costs less than other reports have indicated, a study by the General Accounting Office concludes.

And based on its findings, the study estimates that a national examination system would cost between $160 million and $330 million a year, considerably less than the $3 billion per year some analysts have estimated. The report also suggests that the actual amount would probably be even less because many districts would replace their current tests with the national exam.

The study, presented to Congress last month, found that, in 1990-91, students spent, on average, less than seven hours a year on testing, including learning test-taking skills and listening to test instructions and results. Each test cost an average of $15 per student, for a total of $516 million. However, the report notes, the amount of testing and the cost were considerably greater in some states and school districts.

A 1990 study by the National Commission on Testing and Public Policy concluded that 20 million school days a year--about half a day per student--were devoted just to taking tests, and that testing cost taxpayers between $725 million and $915 million annually.

“At least on average, and considering only systemwide tests, students do not seem to have been overly tested,’' the G.A.O. report states. “Thus, an argument that a national examination system should be opposed on those grounds demands other evidence than what we found.’'

But it also acknowledges that many test directors surveyed expressed opposition to a national system, a finding it says “should give pause’’ to national-testing advocates.

Walter Haney, a senior research fellow at the center for the study of testing, evaluation, and educational policy at Boston College and a staff member of the national commission, said the G.A.O. report tends to underestimate the indirect costs--in teacher and student time--testing exacts.

He also questioned the report’s estimate for a proposed national system.

“The ideas for a national program are so amorphous,’' Mr. Haney said, “it’s pure guesswork to come up with a figure.’'

‘Systemwide’ Tests Studied

The new report, “Student Testing,’' is based on surveys administered to the 50 state testing directors and to local administrators in 500 school districts.

The surveys examined only “systemwide’’ tests, which the agency defined as those administered to every student, almost every student, or a representative sample of all students in at least one grade level in a district or state. Such tests excluded those administered to special populations; optional tests, including college-admission tests; and many tests used for Chapter 1 evaluation.

The survey found a wide range in time burden and cost.

Counting the cost of administering a test and personnel costs associated with testing, the study found that cost figures ranged from $1 per student test to over $90 for each test.

As expected, the study notes that performance-based tests cost considerably more than multiple-choice tests. In the six states that use both types, the study found that the performance tests cost twice as much: $33 per student, on average, compared with $16 per student for the multiple-choice tests.

Using those estimates, the report projects that a national performance-based exam involving 10 million students--one that tested students in three grade levels, as many national proposals recommend--would cost $330 million a year, plus $100 million in one-time development costs.

But the study also notes that district officials tended to drop their tests when state-mandated tests that were similar to their own were imposed. The report estimates that about half of districts would keep their old tests if a new national performance-based exam were introduced, yielding from $193 million to $209 million in new costs and about 30 minutes in student time per year.

Copies of the report are available from the U.S. General Accounting Office, P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg, Md. 20877; (202) 275-6241. Single copies are free; additional copies cost $2 each.

A version of this article appeared in the January 27, 1993 edition of Education Week as Testing Places Only a ‘Modest’ Burden On Students, G.A.O. Report Concludes

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Equity and Access in Mathematics Education: A Deeper Look
Explore the advantages of access in math education, including engagement, improved learning outcomes, and equity.
Content provided by MIND Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: January 31, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: January 17, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education In Their Own Words The Stories That Stuck With Us, 2023 Edition
Our newsroom selected five stories as among the highlights of our work. Here's why.
4 min read
102523 IMSE Reading BS
Adria Malcolm for Education Week
Education Opinion The 10 Most-Read Opinions of 2023
Here are Education Week’s most-read Opinion blog posts and essays of 2023.
2 min read
Collage of lead images for various opinion stories.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty