Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Report on Reading First Outrages This Teacher

October 24, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

I don’t have words to express the outrage I feel in light of the U.S. Department of Education inspector general’s report on the Reading First program (“Scathing Report Casts Cloud Over ‘Reading First’,” Oct. 4, 2006). From the very beginning, I have suspected that this program was skewed toward texts favored by former federal reading czar G. Reid Lyon and his associates.

To people like Mr. Lyon and former Reading First director Christopher J. Doherty, the past few years must have brought fame and fortune. But to a teacher like me, they have meant working with “research based” materials that are not right for my students. Millions of children must be adversely affected by this.

The reading research was done on English-speaking children, but is prescribed for everyone. I teach second-language learners who must use textbooks designed for a different population. I’m supposed to give my English-learners text like this: “Peg Hen can get one kit in the tan van.” Next to it, there is a picture of a hen throwing a sack of something into a van. No English-speaker would ever refer to the sack as a “kit.” Such materials are not helpful to me or my students. I don’t believe any expert truly interested in helping children learn to read would approve of such vacuous text.

Surely Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and other leaders know that research in education must be taken with one huge grain of salt. There is probably one “scientifically based” method of teaching reading for every human being on Earth. That’s undoubtedly why Reading Recovery is so successful (and expensive): Teachers are trained to teach to the individual child’s strengths and weaknesses. Each child gets a lesson that is designed specifically for him or her. This program would be my choice, as a teacher of 42 years, if my district could afford it.

What makes this Reading First scandal so much worse is the fact that the e-mails exchanged by the people involved indicate they were well aware of their deceptive actions and motivations. The quality of their language shows readers whom the real “dirtbags”—to quote Mr. Doherty—are.

Linda Mele Johnson

Long Beach, Calif.

A version of this article appeared in the October 25, 2006 edition of Education Week as Report on Reading First Outrages This Teacher

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Attend to the Whole Child: Non-Academic Factors within MTSS
Learn strategies for proactively identifying and addressing non-academic barriers to student success within an MTSS framework.
Content provided by Renaissance
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum How to Teach Digital & Media Literacy in the Age of AI
Join this free event to dig into crucial questions about how to help students build a foundation of digital literacy.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: June 19, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: June 12, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: May 29, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: May 8, 2024
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read