Opinion Blog


Rick Hess Straight Up

Education policy maven Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute think tank offers straight talk on matters of policy, politics, research, and reform.

Education Opinion

Explaining the ‘Why’ of New Education Policies

By Guest Blogger — March 09, 2018 2 min read

This week, Andy Saultz will be taking over the guest blog to discuss the real stuff of when and how policy gets made, and to share lessons he learned during his time as a school board member. Andy previously taught high school social studies before earning his Ph.D. from Michigan State. He is currently an assistant professor of educational leadership at Miami University.

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) was drafted in a familiar way. The law attempts to rectify many of the problems with No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Policymakers tend to be reactive when drafting such laws, trying to fix the problems of yesterday rather than forecasting how policy may prevent, or even address, troubles of the future.

One way ESSA tried to fix NCLB was to add a “non-academic” indicator to school accountability systems. States were required to include at least one of these indicators in their ESSA accountability plans that would be implemented in the 2017-18 school year. This could be anything from attendance, to school climate, to suspension/expulsion data.

I spent much of the last two years working with, and listening to, educators strategizing about how to best shape Ohio’s plan for ESSA. The Ohio Department of Education (ODE), to their credit, spent much of the 2016-17 school year talking with educators, researchers, and parents about how the state should craft the new accountability system. They presented the background on the new law, its details, and what the options were to meet the various requirements. They listened to feedback from these groups before deciding on the specifics of Ohio’s plan.

The first forum was telling. The staffers at ODE finished the thirty-minute presentation right on time, and opened it up for questions and comments. A superintendent spoke first: “Don’t we already do something that we could use for this?”

As I listened to this exchange, I could not help but chuckle. What a perfect exemplar of the divide between policymakers and practitioners. The superintendent, and many other educators I spoke with about ESSA, just wanted to create a system that would not add work to their daily lives. Policymakers, on the other hand, were trying to expand the accountability system as a way of addressing the critique that NCLB was too focused on standardized test scores. So what did they do? They wrote a new law that just asked states to add in a new indicator.

ODE had a very polished presentation, but it did not persuade many educators that adding a non-academic indicator would improve teaching and learning. Many of them interpreted ESSA as just another federal policy that would lead to seemingly never-ending piles of paperwork. Principals and superintendents spend a lot of time on bureaucracy. Therefore, when crafting a new policy, policymakers need to consider its effects on the daily lives of educators. Including educators in all levels of the process would help anticipate ways this would happen.

Policymakers also need to carefully roll out policies in a way that explains why these changes are happening. There is evidence that non-academic indicators may improve student learning, but that evidence was not a focus of the ODE presentation of ESSA to stakeholders. Before we can address what a policy should look like or how we will measure it, we need to make sure that everyone understands why these changes will be good for kids. If we do not, a new policy just becomes another box to check on the ever-expanding to-do list for school administrators.

Andy Saultz

The opinions expressed in Rick Hess Straight Up are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Recruiting and Retaining a More Diverse Teaching Workforce
We discuss the importance of workforce diversity and learn strategies to recruit and retain teachers from diverse backgrounds.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
Student Well-Being Webinar Boosting Teacher and Student Motivation During the Pandemic: What It Takes
Join Alyson Klein and her expert guests for practical tips and discussion on how to keep students and teachers motivated as the pandemic drags on.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
A Holistic Approach to Social-Emotional Learning
Register to learn about the components and benefits of holistically implemented SEL.
Content provided by Committee for Children

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Principal
Meredith, New Hampshire
Inter-Lakes School District
Elementary Principal
Washington State
Wenatchee School District
Principal
Meredith, New Hampshire
Inter-Lakes School District
Elementary Principal
Washington State
Wenatchee School District

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: February 3, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 20, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read