Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Cost-Cutting Proposal Puts State Tests at Risk

June 21, 2005 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

Your article titled “States Eyeing Expense of Hand-Scored Tests in Light of NCLB Rules” on May 25, 2005 highlights a significant risk that the No Child Left Behind Act could pose to the value and efficacy of states’ large-scale assessments. For the U.S. Department of Education to suggest that states drop open-ended test items as a cost-cutting measure is tantamount to saying that assessment data are only meant to classify schools and teachers, rather than to actually improve teaching and learning.

Open-response and multiple-choice items don’t measure the same skills. In reading, do you want students to draw conclusions, or pick from a list of someone else’s conclusions? In math, do you want students to arrive at an answer using approaches other than the ones you intend to test? One research-supported lesson of the “authentic assessment” movement of the 1990s is that sole reliance on multiple-choice items in high-stakes testing can have a negative impact on curriculum and instruction.

Some of the richest assessments states have developed contained only open-response items. These tests were equally reliable as multiple-choice tests; the nature of measurement error was just different for the two formats.

Given the current environment, most states would find this approach impractical. For that reason, we support balanced assessments that include both multiple-choice and open-response items. History shows that such assessments provide the quality of information educators need to improve curriculum, instruction, and most important, student learning.

While all-multiple-choice assessments might satisfy the letter of the law, I certainly hope that the spirit of the law—and the true goal of assessment—is to help improve teaching and learning.

Stuart R. Kahl

President and Chief Executive Officer

Measured Progress

Dover, N.H.

Events

Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.
Federal Webinar The Trump Budget and Schools: Subscriber Exclusive Quick Hit
EdWeek subscribers, join this 30-minute webinar to find out what the latest federal policy changes mean for K-12 education.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
End Student Boredom: K-12 Publisher's Guide to 70% Engagement Boost
Calling all K-12 Publishers! Student engagement flatlining? Learn how to boost it by up to 70%.
Content provided by KITABOO

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Quiz Are You Keeping Up With Trump’s Big Changes to K-12 Funding? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz How Is Trump Changing School Discipline Rules? Take This Week’s Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Briefly Stated: April 30, 2025
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Quiz What Is Trump’s New AI Plan for K-12 Schools? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Illustration of tasks assisted with AI.
Canva