Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

Cost-Cutting Proposal Puts State Tests at Risk

June 21, 2005 1 min read

To the Editor:

Your article titled “States Eyeing Expense of Hand-Scored Tests in Light of NCLB Rules” on May 25, 2005 highlights a significant risk that the No Child Left Behind Act could pose to the value and efficacy of states’ large-scale assessments. For the U.S. Department of Education to suggest that states drop open-ended test items as a cost-cutting measure is tantamount to saying that assessment data are only meant to classify schools and teachers, rather than to actually improve teaching and learning.

Open-response and multiple-choice items don’t measure the same skills. In reading, do you want students to draw conclusions, or pick from a list of someone else’s conclusions? In math, do you want students to arrive at an answer using approaches other than the ones you intend to test? One research-supported lesson of the “authentic assessment” movement of the 1990s is that sole reliance on multiple-choice items in high-stakes testing can have a negative impact on curriculum and instruction.

Some of the richest assessments states have developed contained only open-response items. These tests were equally reliable as multiple-choice tests; the nature of measurement error was just different for the two formats.

Given the current environment, most states would find this approach impractical. For that reason, we support balanced assessments that include both multiple-choice and open-response items. History shows that such assessments provide the quality of information educators need to improve curriculum, instruction, and most important, student learning.

While all-multiple-choice assessments might satisfy the letter of the law, I certainly hope that the spirit of the law—and the true goal of assessment—is to help improve teaching and learning.

Stuart R. Kahl

President and Chief Executive Officer

Measured Progress

Dover, N.H.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read