Education

No Test-Score Edge Found for Cleveland Voucher Students

February 21, 2006 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A new study of the Cleveland voucher program finds that participating students did not show higher test-score gains than comparison students, and in fact performed slightly worse in math.

The report by the National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, housed at Teachers College, Columbia University, adds fuel to the long-standing debate over private school vouchers.

Clive R. Belfield, the center’s associate director, said his reanalysis of data from 2000 and 2002 revealed no academic advantages for voucher users. And in mathematics, one of three subjects covered, he said the vouchers actually correlated with a “moderate disadvantage, equal to one-tenth of the black-white test gap.”

“The Evidence on Education Vouchers: An Application to the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program” is posted by the National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.

“Basically, this [report] asks: Each year, how much faster do voucher students’ scores grow, relative to other children’s scores?” he said. “The answer [is] ‘No faster, perhaps even slower.’ ”

Mr. Belfield said that some important constraints on the available data urge caution in interpreting the results.

“Ideally, one would want to use an experimental design,” he said, referring to a random-assignment approach with a control group. “In the absence of that, these are the only data we have.”

The Cleveland program, launched in 1995, provides students with tuition vouchers to attend religious or secular private schools. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the state-financed program against a legal challenge in the 2002 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris decision, saying that the vouchers did not unconstitutionally blend church and state.

Ohio is expanding its voucher effort with a program, starting next fall, that will provide state-financed scholarships of up to $5,000 each for as many as 14,000 students who attend public schools that the state declares in “academic emergency” for three straight years. Currently, more than 5,700 students receive vouchers worth up to $3,000 each through the Cleveland program, which gives preference to low-income families.

Findings Similar

Mr. Belfield’s study, issued this month, re-examines data that have been scrutinized by the Indiana Center for Evaluation at Indiana University, which was under contract with the state of Ohio to evaluate the program.

Kim K. Metcalf, who oversaw the earlier evaluation, said the new findings are fairly consistent, despite some differences in analytical approach that he described as “absolutely defensible.”

“He found essentially the same things we did over time,” Mr. Metcalf, who now is the director of assessment for the 11,000-student Monroe County school district in Bloomington, Ind., said of Mr. Belfield.

However, Mr. Metcalf said, his own research did not discern any negative effects for the vouchers.

“There appeared to be no consistent advantage or disadvantage for voucher users for 1st through 5th grade,” he said. “But unlike Clive, at no time did we find that voucher users did less well.”

The Belfield study, which examined 2nd and 4th graders in 2000 and 2002, makes some adjustments.

First, it adds a new group: students who used the vouchers temporarily but then returned to public schools. Other groups compared were students who received vouchers, those who requested vouchers but were turned down, and a sample of students in regular Cleveland public schools. It also adjusts for the prior achievement of students.

A version of this article appeared in the February 22, 2006 edition of Education Week as No Test-Score Edge Found for Cleveland Voucher Students

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Seamless Integrations for Engagement in the Classroom
Learn how to seamlessly integrate new technologies into your classroom to support student engagement. 
Content provided by GoGuardian
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Be the Change: Strategies to Make Year-Round Hiring Happen
Learn how to leverage actionable insights to diversify your recruiting efforts and successfully deploy a year-round recruiting plan.
Content provided by Frontline
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Critical Ways Leaders Can Build a Culture of Belonging and Achievement
Explore innovative practices for using technology to build an environment of belonging and achievement for all staff and students.
Content provided by DreamBox Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: September 21, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: September 7, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read
Education Briefly Stated: August 31, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: August 24, 2022
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read