Sex Abuse a Shadow Over U.S. Schools
Investigation examines cases of educator misconduct across nation.
The young teacher hung his head, avoiding eye contact. Yes, he had touched a 5th grader’s breast during recess. “I guess it was just lust of the flesh,” he told his boss.
That got Gary C. Lindsey fired from his first teaching job in Oelwein, Iowa. But it didn’t end his career. He taught for decades in Illinois and Iowa, fending off at least a half-dozen more abuse accusations.
When he finally surrendered his teaching license in 2004—40 years after that first little girl came forward—it wasn’t a principal or a state agency that ended his career. It was one persistent victim and her parents.
Mr. Lindsey’s case is just a small example of a widespread problem in American schools: sexual misconduct by the very teachers who are supposed to be nurturing the nation’s children.
Students in America’s schools are groped. They’re raped. They’re pursued, seduced, and think they’re in love.
An investigation by the Associated Press has found more than 2,500 cases over five years in which educators were punished for actions that ranged from bizarre to sadistic.
There are 3 million public school teachers nationwide, most devoted to their work. Yet the number of abusive educators—nearly three for every school day—speaks to a much larger problem in a system that is stacked against victims.
Most of the abuse never gets reported. Those cases reported often end with no action. Cases investigated sometimes can’t be proven, and many abusers have several victims.
And no one—not the schools, not the courts, not the state or federal governments—has found a surefire way to keep molesting teachers out of classrooms.
Those are the findings of an AP investigation in which reporters sought disciplinary records in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The result is an unprecedented national look at the scope of sex offenses by educators—the very definition of breach of trust.
(Following its own, six-month investigation in 1998, Education Week published a three-part series, “A Trust Betrayed,” that documented the national scope of sexual misconduct involving students and school employees. That series, based in part on a database of nearly 250 cases drawn from published accounts, was updated with further research in 2003.)
The Associated Press’ seven-month investigation found 2,570 educators whose teaching credentials were revoked, denied, surrendered, or sanctioned from 2001 through 2005 following allegations of sexual misconduct.
Young people were the victims in at least 1,801 of the cases, and more than 80 percent of those were students. At least half the educators who were punished by their states also were convicted of crimes related to their misconduct.
The findings draw obvious comparisons to sex-abuse scandals in other institutions, among them the Roman Catholic Church. A review by America’s Catholic bishops found that about 4,400 of 110,000 priests were accused of molesting minors from 1950 through 2002.
Clergy abuse is part of the national consciousness after a string of highly publicized cases. But until now, there’s been little broad public awareness of the extent of educator abuse. Beyond the horror of individual crimes, the larger shame is that the institutions that govern education have only sporadically addressed a problem that’s been apparent for years.
“From my own experience—this could get me in trouble—I think every single school district in the nation has at least one perpetrator. At least one,” says Mary Jo McGrath, a California lawyer who has spent 30 years investigating abuse and misconduct in schools. “It doesn’t matter if it’s urban or rural or suburban.”
One report mandated by Congress estimated that as many as 4.5 million students, out of roughly 50 million in American schools, are subject to sexual misconduct by an employee of a school sometime between kindergarten and 12th grade. That figure includes verbal harassment that’s sexual in nature. ("Sexual Abuse by Educators Is Scrutinized," March 10, 2004.)
Jennah Bramow, one of Mr. Lindsey’s accusers in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, wonders why there isn’t more outrage.
“You’re supposed to be able to send your kids to school knowing that they’re going to be safe,” says Ms. Bramow, now 20. While other victims accepted settlement deals and signed confidentiality agreements, she sued her city’s schools for failing to protect her and others from Mr. Lindsey—and won. Only then was Mr. Lindsey’s teaching license finally revoked.
As an 8-year-old elementary school student, Ms. Bramow told, in a videotaped interview taken in 1995, how Mr. Lindsey forced her hand on what she called his “pee-pee.”
She also drew a picture that showed how Mr. Lindsey made her touch him on the zipper area of his pants.
Mr. Lindsey, now 68, refused requests for an interview. “It never occurs to you people that some people don’t want their past opened back up,” he said when an AP reporter approached him at his home outside Cedar Rapids and asked questions.
That past, according to evidence presented in the Bramows’ civil case, included accusations from students and parents along with reprimands from principals that were filed away, explained away, and ultimately ignored until 1995, when accusations from Ms. Bramow and two other girls forced his early retirement.
Even then, he kept his teaching license until the Bramows took the case public and filed a complaint with the state.
Like Mr. Lindsey, the perpetrators that the AP found are everyday educators—teachers, school psychologists, principals, and superintendents among them.
They’re often popular and recognized for excellence and, in nearly nine out of 10 cases, they’re male.
While some abused students in school, others were cited for sexual misconduct after hours that didn’t necessarily involve a student from their classes, such as viewing or distributing child pornography.
• Joseph E. Hayes, a former principal in East St. Louis, Ill. DNA evidence in a civil case determined that he impregnated a 14-year-old student. Never charged criminally, his license was suspended in 2003. He has ignored an order to surrender it permanently.
• Donald M. Landrum, a high school teacher in Polk County, N.C. His bosses warned him not to meet with female students behind closed doors. They put a glass window in his office door, but Mr. Landrum papered over it. Police later found pornography and condoms in his office and alleged that he was about to have sex with a female student. His license was revoked in 2005.
• Rebecca A. Boicelli, a former teacher in Redwood City, Calif. She conceived a child with a 16-year-old former student then went on maternity leave in 2004 while police investigated. She was hired to teach in a nearby school district; board members said police hadn’t told them about the investigation.
Unions Urge Balance
The overwhelming majority of cases the AP examined involved teachers in public schools. Private school teachers rarely turn up, because many are not required to have a teaching license and, even when they have one, disciplinary actions are typically handled within the school.
The nation’s two major teachers’ unions, the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, each denounced sexual abuse while emphasizing that educators’ rights also must be taken into account.
A total of 2,570 educators nationwide were punished for sexual misconduct from 2001 to 2005, representing about a quarter of all educator-misconduct cases found by the Associated Press in that time period.
• The total number of times an action was taken against a teacher’s license for sexual misconduct was 2,625. (More than 50 teachers lost licenses in more than one state.) Licenses were revoked in 1,636 of the cases; surrendered in 440 cases; suspended in 376 cases; and denied in 108 cases. Other punishments were handed out in the remainder of the cases.
• Students were clearly identified as victims in at least 1,467 of the sexual-misconduct cases. The victim was a young person, a category including students, unidentified youths, family members, and neighbors, in at least 1,801 of the cases.
• Educators made physical contact in at least 1,297, or 72 percent, of the cases in which the victims were youths. The remainder were cases that did not involve physical contact, including verbal sexual harassment and other offenses.
• There were criminal convictions in at least 1,390, or 53 percent, of the cases.
• Nearly nine out of 10 of the educators punished for sexual misconduct were male.
• At least 446 of the cases that the AP found involved educators who had multiple victims.
“Students must be protected from sexual predators and abuse, and teachers must be protected from false accusations,” said NEA President Reg Weaver, who refused to be interviewed and instead released a two-paragraph statement.
Kathy Buzad of the AFT said that “if there’s one incident of sexual misconduct between a teacher and a student, that’s one too many.”
The United States has grown more sympathetic to victims of sex abuse over recent decades, particularly when it comes to young people. Laws that protect children from abusers bear the names of young victims. Police have made pursuing Internet predators a priority. People convicted of abuse typically face tough sentences and registry as sex offenders.
Even so, sexually abusive teachers continue to take advantage, and there are several reasons why.
For one, many Americans deny the problem, and even treat the abuse with misplaced fascination. Popular media reports trumpet relationships between attractive female teachers and male students.
“It’s dealt with in a salacious manner with late-night comedians saying, ‘What 14-year-old boy wouldn’t want to have sex with his teacher?’ It trivializes the whole issue,” says Robert J. Shoop, a professor of educational administration at Kansas State University who has written a book aimed at helping school districts identify and deal with sexual misconduct.
“In other cases,” he added, “it’s reported as if this is some deviant who crawled into the school district—‘and now that they’re gone, everything’s OK.’ But it’s much more prevalent than people would think.”
No National Policy
The AP investigation found efforts to stop individual offenders but, overall, a deeply entrenched resistance toward recognizing and fighting abuse.
It starts in school hallways, where fellow teachers look away or feel powerless to help. School administrators make behind-the-scenes deals to avoid lawsuits and other trouble. And in state capitals and Congress, lawmakers shy from tough state punishments or any cohesive national policy for fear of disparaging a vital profession.
That only enables rogue teachers, and puts young people who aren’t likely to be believed in a tough spot.
In case after case the AP examined, accusations of inappropriate behavior were dismissed. One girl in Mansfield, Ohio, complained about a sexual assault by teacher Donald Coots and got expelled. It was only when a second girl, years later, brought a similar complaint against the same teacher that he was punished.
And that second girl also was ostracized by the school community and ultimately left town.
Unless there’s a videotape of a teacher involved with a child, everyone wants to believe the authority figure, says Wayne Promisel, a retired Virginia detective who has investigated many sex-abuse cases.
He and others who track the problem reiterated one point repeatedly during the AP investigation: Very few abusers get caught.
They point to several academic studies estimating that only about one in 10 victimized children reports sexual abuse of any kind to someone who can do something about it.
Teachers, administrators, and even parents frequently don’t, or won’t, recognize the signs that a crime is taking place.
“They can’t see what’s in front of their face. Not unlike a kid in an alcoholic family, who’ll say, ‘My family is great,’ ” says Ms. McGrath, the California lawyer and investigator who now trains entire school systems in how to recognize what she calls the unmistakable “red flags” of misconduct.
E-Mail as Evidence
In Hamburg, Pa., in 2002, those “red flags” should have been clear. A student skipped classes every day to spend time with one teacher. He gave her gifts and rides in his car. She sat on his lap. The bond ran so deep that the student got chastised repeatedly—even suspended once for being late and absent so often. But there were no questions for the teacher.
Heather Kline was 12, a girl with a broad smile and blond hair pulled back tight. Teacher Troy Mansfield had cultivated her since she was in his 3rd grade class.
“Kids, like, idolized me because they thought I was, like, cool because he paid more attention to me,” says Ms. Kline, now 18, sitting at her mother’s kitchen table, sorting through a file of old poems and cards from Mr. Mansfield. “I was just, like, really comfortable. I could tell him anything.”
He never pushed her, just raised the stakes, bit by bit—a comment about how good she looked, a gift, a hug. She was sure she was in love.
By winter of 7th grade, he was sneaking her off in his car for an hour of sex, dropping in on her weekly baby-sitting duties, e-mailing her about what clothes she should wear, about his sexual fantasies, about marriage and children.
Mr. Mansfield finally got caught by the girl’s mother, and his own words convicted him. At his criminal trial in 2004, Heather read his e-mails and instant messages aloud, from declarations of true love to explicit references to past sex. He’s serving up to 31 years in state prison.
The growing use of e-mails and text messages is leaving a trail that investigators and prosecutors can use to prove an intimate relationship when other evidence is hard to find.
Even then, many in the community find it difficult to accept that a predator is in their midst. When such cases break, defendants often portray the students as seducers or false accusers. However, every investigator questioned said that is largely a misconception.
“I’ve been involved in several hundred investigations,” says Martin Bates, an assistant superintendent in a Salt Lake City school district. “I think I’ve seen that just a couple of times ... where a teacher is being pursued by a student.”
Too often, problem teachers are allowed to leave quietly. That can mean future abuse for another student and another school district.
“They might deal with it internally, suspending the person or having the person move on. So their license is never investigated,” says Charol Shakeshaft, a leading expert in teacher sex abuse who heads the educational leadership department at Virginia Commonwealth University.
It’s a dynamic so common it has its own nicknames—“passing the trash” or the “mobile molester.”
Rise in State Action
Laws in several states require that even an allegation of sexual misconduct be reported to the state departments that oversee teacher licenses. But there’s no consistent enforcement, so such laws are easy to ignore.
Associated Press reporters in every state and the District of Columbia worked for months to provide a national look at sexual misconduct among educators.
The effort began in March, when AP reporters asked state education officials for records of disciplinary actions taken against teacher licenses from 2001 through 2005.
To obtain the records, most of the reporters had to file formal requests, some repeatedly.
Cooperation from state agencies varied widely. In the end, though, all but one provided most of the requested information.
Maine has a law that keeps offending teachers’ names secret, making it the only state that refused to disclose cases of sexual misconduct to the AP. The three cases the AP found in Maine were made public in widely circulated news reports.
Once AP reporters collected all the disciplinary records, they began to get as much detail as possible on cases of alleged sexual misconduct.
Their secondary sources included court, police, and prison records and state sexoffender registries, as well as various news accounts on the cases, including the AP’s.
The reporters were then asked to input their findings into a database.
If the state took an action against an educator following an accusation of sexual misconduct, then that person was included in the AP’s count.
All the educators were disciplined for doing something sexual, inappropriate, and unprofessional. Many were charged criminally, and 1,390 cases resulted in a conviction.
A very small minority of cases, including a couple of dozen involving prostitution, had no direct connection to either schools or to children.
But they did involve sexual misbehavior, and since education officials punished the teachers for those actions, they made it into the AP count.
In some cases, the allegations didn’t result in criminal prosecution.
But the states, typically through their education departments, took action, most often in the form of revocation, suspension, or denial of a state teaching license.
Sometimes states accepted the surrender of a teacher’s license after an accusation surfaced, or as part of a plea deal.
Once reporters entered the teachers in the database, reporters and their editors in each state double-checked the information.
Finally, a team of editors went through the database case by case, eliminating several dozen cases in which it was possible to view the alleged misbehavior as nonsexual.
School officials fear public embarrassment as much as the perpetrators do, Ms. Shakeshaft says. They want to avoid the fallout from going up against a popular teacher. They also don’t want to get sued by teachers or victims, and they don’t want to face a challenge from a strong union.
In the Iowa case, Mr. Lindsey agreed to leave without fighting when his bosses kept the reason for his departure confidential. The decades’ worth of allegations against him would have stayed secret, if not for Ms. Bramow.
Across the country, such deals and lack of information-sharing allow abusive teachers to jump state lines, even when one school does put a stop to the abuse.
While some schools and states have been aggressive about investigating problem teachers and publicizing it when they’re found, others were hesitant to share details of cases with the AP—Alabama and Mississippi were among the more resistant. Maine, the only state that gave the AP no disciplinary information, has a law that keeps offending teachers’ cases secret.
Meanwhile, the reasons given for punishing hundreds of educators, including many in California, were so vague there was no way to tell why they’d been punished, until further investigation by AP reporters revealed it was sexual misconduct.
And in Hawaii, no educators were disciplined by the state in the five years the AP examined, even though some teachers there were serving sentences for various sex crimes during that time. They technically remained teachers, even behind bars.
Elsewhere, there have been fitful steps toward catching errant teachers that may be having some effect. The AP found the number of state actions against sexually abusive teachers rose steadily, to a high of 649 in 2005.
More states now require background checks on teachers, fingerprinting, and mandatory reporting of abuse, though there are still loopholes and a lack of coordination among districts and states.
U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the past 20 years on civil rights and sex discrimination have opened schools up to potentially huge financial punishments for abuses, which has driven some schools to act.
And the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification keeps a list of educators who have been punished for any reason, but only shares the names among state agencies.
Holes in Safety Net
The uncoordinated system that’s developed means some teachers still fall through the cracks. Aaron M. Brevik is a case in point.
Mr. Brevik was a teacher at an elementary school in Warren, Mich., until he was accused of using a camera hidden in a gym bag to secretly film boys in locker rooms and showers. He also faced charges that he recorded himself molesting a boy while the child slept.
Found guilty of criminal sexual conduct, Mr. Brevik is now serving a five- to 20-year prison sentence and lost his Michigan license in 2005.
What Michigan officials apparently didn’t know when they hired him was that Mr. Brevik’s teaching license in Minnesota had been permanently suspended in 2001 after he allegedly invited two male minors to stay with him in a hotel room. He was the principal of an elementary school in southeastern Minnesota at the time.
“I tell you what, they never go away. They just blend a little better,” says Steve Janosko, a prosecutor in Ocean County, N.J., who handled the case of a former high school teacher and football coach, Nicholas J. Arminio.
Mr. Arminio surrendered his New Jersey teaching license in 1994 after two female students separately accused him of inappropriate touching. The state of Maryland didn’t know that when he applied for teaching credentials and took a job at a high school in Baltimore County. He eventually resigned and lost that license, too.
Even so, until this month, he was coaching football at another Baltimore County high school in a job that does not require a teaching license. After the AP started asking questions, he was fired.
Victims also face consequences when teachers are punished.
Read more about this series, "A Lingering Shame: Sexual Abuse of Students by School Employees." The collection includes a new Associated Press series on the issue, as well as special Education Week coverage.
In Pennsylvania, after news of teacher Troy Mansfield’s arrest hit, girls called Ms. Kline, his 12-year-old victim, a “slut” to her face. A teacher called her a “vixen.” Friends stopped talking to her. Kids no longer sat with her at lunch. Her abuser, meanwhile, had been a popular teacher and football coach.
So, between rumors that she was pregnant or doing drugs and her own panic attacks and depression, Ms. Kline bounced between schools. At 16, she ran away to Nashville.
“I didn’t have my childhood,” says Ms. Kline, who’s back home now, working at a grocery cash register and hoping to get her General Educational Development credential so she can go to nursing school. “He had me so matured at so young. I remember going from little baby dolls to just being an adult.”
The courts dealt her a final insult. A federal judge dismissed her civil suit against the school, saying administrators had no obligation to protect her from a predatory teacher since officials were unaware of the abuse, despite what the court called widespread “unsubstantiated rumors” in the school. The family is appealing.
In Iowa, the state supreme court made the opposite ruling in the Bramow case, deciding she and her parents could sue the Cedar Rapids schools for failing to stop Mr. Lindsey.
Ms. Bramow, now a young mother who waits tables for a living, won a $20,000 judgment. But Mr. Lindsey was never criminally charged, because of what the former county prosecutor deemed insufficient evidence.
Arthur Sensor, the former superintendent in Oelwein, Iowa, who vividly recalls pressuring Mr. Lindsey to quit on Feb. 18, 1964, regrets that he didn’t do more to stop him back then.
Now, he says, he’d call the police.
“He promised me he wouldn’t do it again, that he had learned. And he was a young man, a beginning teacher, had a young wife, a young child,” Mr. Sensor, now 86 years old, said during testimony at the Bramows’ civil trial. “I wanted to believe him, and I did.”
Vol. 27, Issue 09, Pages 1,16-19