Ed-Tech Policy

House Bill Seen as Hampering N.E.A. Computer Project

By Alex Heard — March 14, 1984 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The House of Representatives last week passed an amendment that was created largely to hamper the National Education Association’s new project in computer-software evaluation.

The amendment is designed primarily to bar school districts from using federal education funds to purchase computer software through a new catalogue offered by the nea’s nonprofit education foundation, the National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.

The amendment, which passed by a vote of 205 to 173, is attached to the Vocational Education Act. That act, which came up for renewal this year, passed the House last week. The amendment had earlier been defeated in the House Education and Labor Committee.

The amendment, sponsored by Representative Marge Roukema, Republican of New Jersey, prohibits the spending of federal education money for equipment sold by an organization that “represents the interests of the purchasers or its employees,” according to a spokesman for Representative Roukema.

The practical effect, he said, is to block the use of federal education funds for purchases through the nea catalogue.

Unethical Position

Representative Roukema and other critics of the computer project contend that the nea has placed itself in an unethical position by both endorsing and selling education software. The catalogue, released last month, did not explain that the nea’s foundation would eventually receive a share of profits from sales of items recommended in it.

The nea rejects the suggestion that it will profit from the project. “It is inaccurate to say that the nea is profiting from this,” said the foundation’s executive director, Jack H. Kleinmann.

“The nea receives no fees, no royalties, no commission,” he said. ''Any profits the foundation makes--which will not come until 1985 at the earliest--will be channeled back into the foundation.”

The education foundation was created to carry on a variety of educational projects after the nea lost its nonprofit status in 1969. Its directors are appointed by the nea, and a minimum of five members of the foundation board must be representatives of the nea.

The new project, called the Educational Computer Service, is a joint effort of the foundation and a Maryland computer firm, Cordatum Inc. It employs teachers and technical experts to evaluate course materials for possible inclusion in a catalogue of “approved” software.

The first catalogue, published last month, endorses 115 software programs and offers them for sale. Most purchasers so far have been teachers, curriculum directors, and school districts, according to Mr. Kleinmann.

The project will receive a percentage of the amount subscribers pay for programs. The foundation and Cordatum Inc. will split any future profits evenly.

The catalogue, called “The Yellow Book of Computer Products for Education,” costs $20.

Manufacturers of some 200 educational programs, hoping to be included, paid evaluation fees ranging from $100 to $1,000 (depending on the software’s running time), Mr. Kleinmann said. He said the charges cover the cost of the teachers and technical personnel who perform the evaluations.

A version of this article appeared in the March 14, 1984 edition of Education Week as House Bill Seen as Hampering N.E.A. Computer Project

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Decision Time: The Future of Teaching and Learning in the AI Era
The AI revolution is already here. Will it strengthen instruction or set it back? Join us to explore the future of teaching and learning.
Content provided by HMH
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Stop the Drop: Turn Communication Into an Enrollment Booster
Turn everyday communication with families into powerful PR that builds trust, boosts reputation, and drives enrollment.
Content provided by TalkingPoints
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Webinar
Integrating and Interpreting MTSS Data: How Districts Are Designing Systems That Identify Student Needs
Discover practical ways to organize MTSS data that enable timely, confident MTSS decisions, ensuring every student is seen and supported.
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy How Cellphone Bans Have Affected Students' Lives: What Teens Say
A new survey asked teenagers if the restrictions affected their happiness and ability to make friends.
4 min read
Students enter school in Spokane, Wash. on Dec. 3, 2025. Most teens surveyed said their school’s cellphone restrictions have had no impact on “making friends.”
Students enter school in Spokane, Wash. on Dec. 3, 2025, with a posted reminder of the cellphone ban. In a new survey, most teens said their school’s cellphone restrictions have had no impact on “making friends.”
Kaylee Domzalski/Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Teachers Like Cellphone Bans—But Not for Themselves
Teachers say they need to use their phones for their work, but some administrators want rules in place.
3 min read
Teacher on cellphone in classroom with blurred students in background.
Education Week and Getty
Ed-Tech Policy The Ingredients for a Successful Cellphone Ban: What Teachers Say
One key component: support from school leaders.
5 min read
A student at Ferris High School in Spokane, Wash., briefly checks their phone during class on Dec. 3, 2025.
A student at Ferris High School in Spokane, Wash., briefly checks their phone during class on Dec. 3, 2025. Teachers say there are some actions administrators can take that will cellphone restrictions easier to implement in the classroom.
Kaylee Domzalski/Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy These Schools Restricted Cellphone Use. Here’s What Happened Next
Principals noted a decrease in discipline referrals and an increase in student engagement.
6 min read
At one high school in Washington state, students are allowed to use their phones during lunch breaks and between classes.
At one high school in Washington state, students are allowed to use their phones during lunch breaks and between classes. Principals say they want to help students develop a healthier relationship with cellphones.
Kaylee Domzalski/Education Week