Standards

Science Standards Have Yet To Seep Into Class, Panel Says

By David J. Hoff — May 22, 2002 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The national science education standards have been the basis for state curriculum decisions, textbook publishers’ new materials, and school districts’ choices for professional development, says a panel of researchers.

But the voluntary guidelines haven’t yet had a significant impact in the most important place: science classrooms.

“We saw little change since the introduction of the standards in how [science] is being taught,” said P. Sean Smith, a senior research associate at Horizon Research Inc., a Chapel Hill, N.C.-based company that conducted the study for the National Science Foundation.

Horizon surveyed science and math teachers on their instructional practices in 2000 and compared their answers against the same set of survey questions administered in 1993. The results were released here this month.

“We saw little to no change in the use of hands-on or inquiry-based learning,” Mr. Smith said, referring to two important themes in the science education standards published by the National Research Council in 1996.

“We have a long way to go before we see changes in what’s happening in the classroom,” added James D. Ellis, an associate professor of teaching and leadership at the University of Kansas in Lawrence.

Mr. Ellis and Mr. Smith are members of two of the five research groups commissioned by the NRC to review the impact of its science standards. The NRC assigned each group a topic, such as curriculum, assessment, or student achievement, and asked the members to evaluate how the standards had affected that area.

The National Research Council is a part of the congressionally chartered National Academy of Sciences, the nation’s pre-eminent scientific organization.

The national standards define the scientific knowledge scientists and educators say students ought to learn from kindergarten through high school graduation. They encourage schools to cut back on the amount of material they cover in favor of in-depth, hands-on experiences in which students learn the concepts underlying important scientific principles.

In writing the standards, the NRC consulted the work of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the National Science Teachers Association, which each published documents in the early 1990s spelling out what students should know in general terms.

To measure the standards’ influence, the NRC hired researchers to gauge how curriculum, teacher development, testing and accountability, instructional practices, and student achievement have changed since 1996. The teams presented their findings at the research council’s headquarters here May 10.

State Incorporation

Overall, the research teams were in agreement about the findings they presented during a panel discussion that the standards have been instrumental in changing school policies, but that those changes haven’t filtered down to the classroom.

States that have written their own standards have often used the national ones as a starting point.

In the midst of heated debate three years ago over the topic of evolution in the Kansas science standards, for example, few people noticed that the working draft rejected by the state board of education relied heavily on the national standards, Mr. Ellis said.

Most other states have successfully incorporated major pieces of the science standards into their own without controversy, Mr. Ellis said.

While those state standards aren’t having the effect on classrooms that advocates would like, they may soon, others said. Thirty-three states now assess students’ scientific knowledge and skill as part of their testing systems, said Norman L. Webb, the director of the Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

By the 2007-08 school year, all states are expected to measure students’ science knowledge at least once, at each level, in elementary, middle, and high school, under the federal “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001.

The rapid expansion of testing may add to the national standards’ influence on classrooms, especially if the assessments are designed to measure the content specified in the standards.

“The assessments do influence what students learn and what teachers teach,” Mr. Webb said.

But one of the biggest problems with the standards, other panel members said, is that they cover too much material.

While the standards say that teachers should emphasize hands-on- learning, they also list a broad range of scientific principles that students should learn. Teachers are having a hard time finding the time to offer exploratory learning while still covering the content, according to Iris R. Weiss, the president of Horizon Research.

A version of this article appeared in the May 22, 2002 edition of Education Week as Science Standards Have Yet To Seep Into Class, Panel Says


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Opinion How the Failure of the Common Core Looked From the Ground
Steve Peha shares insights from his on-site professional-development work about why the common core failed, in a guest letter to Rick Hess.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards Opinion Common Core Is a Meal Kit, Not a Nothingburger
Caroline Damon argues Rick Hess and Tom Loveless sold the common core short, claiming the issue was a matter of high-quality implementation.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Standards How New Common Core Research Connects to Biden's Plans for Children and Families
A study of national test scores indicate the early phase of the Common Core State Standards did not help disadvantaged students.
5 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion After All That Commotion, Was the Common Core a Big Nothingburger?
The Common Core State Standards may not have had an impact on student outcomes, but they did make school improvement tougher and more ideological.
3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty