Pre-K Standards Said to Slight Social, Emotional Skills

By Linda Jacobson — July 14, 2004 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Thirty-six states now have standards for what children should know and be able to do before they enter kindergarten, particularly in literacy and other academic areas. But many of those documents don’t give the same level of attention to other aspects of development, such as social and emotional skills and physical growth, according to the latest findings of a three-year study of states’ early-learning standards.

“Overall, standards tend to emphasize language and cognition over other areas,” Catherine Scott-Little, one of the authors of the study, said here last month at a conference of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. “We didn’t want to compare states, but we wanted to look at what’s been emphasized.”

The report comes as standards for preschoolers are increasing in importance. If states continue on their current course, 45 of them will have early-learning standards in another year or two.

Although a draft of the study, which was co-written by Sharon Lynn Kagan, a professor of early-childhood policy at Teachers College, Columbia University, was released at the June 20-23 gathering of early-childhood educators, the results are awaiting final approval from the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences.

Delving Deeper

The researchers’ earlier report, issued last year, provided an overview of which states were writing early-learning standards.

With the second phase of the project, the authors sought to delve deeper into the standards documents to see what is being included and what is being left out, Ms. Scott-Little, an assistant professor of human development and family studies at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, told the group gathered for the NAEYC’s 13th annual professional- development institute.

As a guideline for examining the standards, the authors used the 1995 definition of school readiness written by the now- defunct National Education Goals Panel—a description that is still widely accepted in the early-childhood field.

The document describes five dimensions of children’s development: physical well-being and motor skills; social and emotional; language; cognition and general knowledge; and approaches to learning, which means such characteristics as showing curiosity and taking initiative.

In addition to looking at whether all five dimensions were covered in the states’ documents, the researchers examined how deep the standards writers went in each area.

Across all the standards documents included in the report, which does not name specific states, 38.5 percent of the standards focused on cognitive skills or general knowledge, with language development a close second at 31.7 percent.

The percentages of standards devoted to the other three areas were considerably lower: Twelve percent focused on social and emotional development, 9.3 percent concentrated on approaches to learning, and 8.4 percent covered physical and motor development.

When looking at depth, the researchers gauged the percentage of standards items within each of the dimensions. For example, in the cognition and general-knowledge category, 44 percent of the standards focused on mathematical or logical knowledge, and 36.7 percent focused on knowledge of the physical world.

The review shows that some areas of development have been “virtually ignored,” Ms. Scott-Little said, such as physical growth, relationships with adults, and speaking and listening.

Wide Variation

Ms. Kagan and Ms. Scott-Little also found tremendous variety in the number of actual standards statements that states are writing—ranging from 50 to more than 370.

And they looked at what factors in the states might have influenced the final products. For instance, in states where policymakers required standards, instead of those where the process was voluntary, the documents were significantly less likely to include items relating to approaches to learning. And in states with a greater link between preschool and K-12 standards, significantly less attention is given to physical and motor skills and social and emotional development.

Regardless, some educators who attended the session here maintained that the notion of writing expectations for preschoolers is out of step with their understanding of child development.

“Young children are not standardized,” one woman said following the presentation.

Ms. Kagan agreed, adding that in the process of writing such standards, early-childhood educators run the risk of “misunderstanding nearly a century of research” on how young children learn.

A version of this article appeared in the July 14, 2004 edition of Education Week as Pre-K Standards Said to Slight Social, Emotional Skills


Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Personalized Learning Webinar
No Time to Waste: Individualized Instruction Will Drive Change
Targeted support and intervention can boost student achievement. Join us to explore tutoring’s role in accelerating the turnaround. 
Content provided by Varsity Tutors for Schools
Student Well-Being K-12 Essentials Forum Social-Emotional Learning: Making It Meaningful
Join us for this event with educators and experts on the damage the pandemic did to academic and social and emotional well-being.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Standards Political Debate Upends Texas Social Studies Standards Process
The Lone Star State is the latest to throw out a set of standards after conservative activists organized in opposition.
7 min read
USA flag fractured in pieces over whole flag.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Standards Opinion Educators Weigh In on Implementing the Common Core, Even Now
Though outlawed in some states, the standards still offer a strong foundation for English, math, and other subjects.
4 min read
A woman tutors a young child.
Collage by Vanessa Solis/Education Week (images: Svetlana Ievleva/iStock/Getty Images Plus; DigitalVision Vectors)
Standards The Sex Ed. Battleground Heats Up (Again). Here's What's Actually in New Standards
Vocal opposition from some conservative groups has put a spotlight on schools’ instructional choices.
11 min read
Illustration of contraceptives and anatomical diagrams of internal reproductive organs and cells
Alisa Potapovich/iStock/Getty
Standards Opinion Did I Accurately Guess the Fate of the Common Core? You Be the Judge
In 2012, I imagined what the Common Core would be like in a decade. Now, readers can compare this imagined “future” to reality.
7 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty