Opinion Blog


Rick Hess Straight Up

Education policy maven Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute think tank offers straight talk on matters of policy, politics, research, and reform. Read more from this blog.

Assessment Opinion

The National Assessment Governing Board’s Troubling Gag Order

By Rick Hess — May 04, 2021 3 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Someone is trying to gag the National Assessment Governing Board’s board members.

The National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) oversees the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)—more commonly known as “the nation’s report card.” As the NAEP website puts it, “First administered in 1969, [NAEP] is the largest continuing and nationally representative assessment of what our nation’s students know and can do in subjects such as mathematics, reading, science, and writing.” In short, NAGB is in charge of the most reliable, trusted data on how American students are faring.

NAGB’s sprawling 26-member governing board includes a lively mix of educators, researchers, elected officials, the general public, and more. The whole value of such a board is to get multiple perspectives, allow the board members to learn from one another when discussing issues, and provide guidance that reflects the concerns of various stakeholders.

Well, on April 20, Haley Barbour, the chair of the NAGB board and a former governor of Mississippi, sent the board members a two-page letter spelling out a series of restrictions on how these board members can henceforth communicate.

Checker Finn, a former NAGB chair, president emeritus of the Fordham Institute, and one of the nation’s leading authorities on NAEP, wrote earlier this week of Barbour’s missive: “NAGB members must cease communicating with each other and with outsiders, at least if it’s in writing and pertains to matters that may come before the board. If they persist, they must share all such communications with board staff . . . Which is to say, Big Brother will henceforth watch every written communication that every NAGB member has with anyone on any ‘matter within the Board’s purview.’”

This is disturbing. Since NAGB deals with reading, math, civics, school performance, assessment, and more, pretty much any professional matter that educators or education researchers might discuss falls under the board’s purview. Presumably, this means that board members will no longer be free to question or discuss the organization’s decisions, with board colleagues or anyone else, except under the watchful eye of organizational leaders. It also means that any educator or official who raises a concern to a board member or asks a question of one will have their query forwarded to NAGB officialdom. Intentionally or not, this move could squash dissenting or inconvenient voices who fear getting caught crosswise with federal education officials.

As Finn notes, “Moreover, the Barbour letter says they’re going to shut down the ‘chat’ function during Zoom meetings so that board members cannot have side ‘conversations.’” The message this sends? As Finn puts it, “Turn off the internet. Don’t let them communicate. And they won’t be able to conspire or dissent.”

It’s not entirely clear what provoked this troubling move, or whether it came from Biden staffers at the Department of Education or NAGB officials seeking more control of the board. Aside from lots of vague head-nodding toward “management of government records,” “regulatory guidelines,” and “mandatory training,” Barbour’s letter (which has not yet been publicly released) never actually explains what changes necessitate or excuse its Draconian step. The letter suggests COVID-19 was the impetus, since it has “limited the time and ease with which” board members can engage one another—though it’s not clear how restricting communication helps with that. Barbour also alludes to federal laws “governing the preservation and protection of government records”—though, again, it’s unclear why private in-person conversations were kosher in 2019 but private conversations are suddenly illicit in 2021.

Some suspect that the letter is a response to the roiling concerns about NAGB’s proposed new reading “framework,” which features an increasingly controversial push to throw out the long-standing approach to reading comprehension in favor of one which, prominent critics argue, will de-emphasize texts and inflate scores.

Perhaps NAGB has a good reason for trying to impose a gag order on board members; stifle their ability to discuss issues with one another; or communicate with the nation’s educators, parents, researchers, and public officials. If so, I’d very much like to hear it. Otherwise, this directive sets a troubling precedent and one that needs to be reversed—the sooner the better. My understanding is that there’s already been substantial, commendable pushback from a number of board members. It can only help if those on the outside make their own voices heard, as well.

Related Tags:

The opinions expressed in Rick Hess Straight Up are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Strategies for Improving Student Outcomes with Teacher-Student Relationships
Explore strategies for strengthening teacher-student relationships and hear how districts are putting these methods into practice to support positive student outcomes.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Transform Teaching and Learning with AI
Increase productivity and support innovative teaching with AI in the classroom.
Content provided by Promethean
Curriculum Webinar Computer Science Education Movement Gathers Momentum. How Should Schools React?
Discover how schools can expand opportunities for students to study computer science education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Latest Round of Federal Grants Aims to Make States' Assessments More Equitable, Precise
The U.S. Department of Education awarded over $29 million in competitive grants to 10 state education agencies.
2 min read
Assessment review data 599911460
vladwei/iStock/Getty<br/>
Assessment Opinion Are There Better Ways Than Standardized Tests to Assess Students? Educators Think So
Student portfolios and school community surveys are but two of the many alternatives to standardized tests.
3 min read
Illustration of students in virus environment facing wave of test sheets.
Collage by Vanessa Solis/Education Week (Images: iStock/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty)
Assessment Letter to the Editor We Need NAEP
The president and CEO of Knowledge Alliance responds to a recent opinion essay's criticism of the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
1 min read
Illustration of an open laptop receiving an email.
iStock/Getty
Assessment Letter to the Editor 2022 Assessment ‘Most Important’ Ever
The executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board responds to criticism of NAEP in this letter to the editor.
1 min read
Illustration of an open laptop receiving an email.
iStock/Getty