Law & Courts

Wisconsin Grants Privacy to Teacher E-Mails

By Mark Walsh & Katie Ash — August 13, 2010 4 min read

A ruling by Wisconsin’s highest court on teachers’ personal e-mails on school computers marks the latest in a series of decisions about the privacy of government employees’ e-mail use.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled last month that such e-mails are not public records under state law and need not be disclosed to those who request records.

The decision echoes the conclusion of similar cases in Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Michigan, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

In those states, courts have ruled that under their respective state open-records laws, government employees’ personal e-mails are not part of the public record even if they are sent from public computers during work hours, unless there is a connection to government business.

“There is a distinction between allowing public oversight of employees’ use of public resources and invoking the Public Records Law to invade the private affairs of public employees by categorically revealing the contents of employees’ personal e-mails,” Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson of the Wisconsin Supreme Court wrote in the lead opinion.

The state teachers’ union, which had fought the release of the e-mails, praised the decision.

“It’s sound public policy, and we feel it really offers clarity around the public-records law,” said Christina Brey, a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Education Association Council.

Michael D. Simpson, the assistant general counsel for the 3.2-million member National Education Association, also supported the decision.

“You have to look at the purpose of the [public-records] statutes, which are to create transparency and accountability for how the government functions,” he said. “There’s no public interest to be served by allowing the general public to read and review private e-mails.”

Such laws, however, vary by state, and the same case could have had a different outcome elsewhere, said Mr. Simpson.

For instance, in Massachusetts in 2008, a lower court ruled that e-mails sent on government computers are considered part of the public record, resulting in the release of messages allegedly suggesting an inappropriate relationship between a principal and a teacher.

“It was a very important warning to all public employees to exercise extraordinary caution and not put something in an e-mail unless they’re prepared to see it in public,” said Glenn Koocher, the executive director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees.

‘Fishing Expedition’

The Wisconsin case grew out of a public-records request by a local resident for all e-mails sent and received on school computers by five teachers in the Wisconsin Rapids school district for about a six-week period in 2007. The district permits teachers to use school computers for personal e-mail.

Don Bubolz acknowledged in court proceedings that he was on a “fishing expedition” to examine whether teachers were using e-mail inappropriately when he requested the information.

The teachers did not object to disclosing work-related e-mails, but they sought an injunction to bar the district from disclosing their personal messages. A state trial court held that the teachers’ personal e-mails were public records.

But in the July 16 ruling in Schill v. Wisconsin Rapids School District, the state’s highest court voted 5-2 to reverse that decision. The majority issued three separate opinions that offered slight distinctions in reasoning.

In a plurality opinion joined by two other justices, Chief Justice Abrahamson noted that the state’s public-records law was adopted in 1983, long before e-mail was in widespread use in the workplace.

But most other states’ courts that have considered the issue have also ruled that personal e-mail messages of government employees should be exempt from public-records laws.

Critics Question Ruling

Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, in a dissent joined by one other justice, said the exception for personal e-mails “prevents the public from discovering what public employees are doing during the workday, in the workplace, using equipment purchased with public funds. In so doing, the court contravenes Wisconsin’s long history of transparency in and public access to actions of government employees.”

Mr. Bubolz said he thought the ruling would limit the public’s ability to know whether teachers are wasting time during the workday sending personal e-mail messages.

“I know it’s going to make it difficult to come up with more information in the future,” he said of the ruling.”

Private e-mails could still be made public if they are evidence in a disciplinary hearing or to investigate the misuse of government resources, the chief justice said. The opinion does allow for the public to get some information about personal e-mails, such as how many were sent and at what time.

Still, members of the public will not be able to find out whether public employees are engaging in illegal activity such as campaigning while at work, said Bob Dreps, a lawyer representing news-media organizations that had argued the e-mails should be made public.

The Associated Press, the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association, the Wisconsin Newspapers Association, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and Journal Broadcast Group had filed a brief calling for the e-mails to be released.

Mr. Dreps said the decision points to the need for the legislature to update the public-records law to address e-mail and other records not contemplated 30 years ago.

The Associated Press and Education Week Library Director Kathryn Dorko contributed to this story.
A version of this article appeared in the August 11, 2010 edition of Education Week as Wisconsin Court Allows Teachers’ E-Mails to Stay Private

Events

School & District Management Live Event EdWeek Leadership Symposium
Education Week's Premier Leadership Event for K12 School & District Leaders.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Law & Courts Webinar
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform: A Sphere Education Initiative Conversation
America’s criminal justice system is in crisis and calls for reform are dominating the national debate. Join Cato’s Sphere Education Initiative and Education Week for a webinar on criminal justice and policing featuring the nation’s
Content provided by Cato Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Federal Appeals Court Backs Socioeconomic-Based Admissions Plan for Boston 'Exam Schools'
The court denies an injunction to block the plan for next year and says considering family income in admissions is likely constitutional.
3 min read
Image shows lady justice standing before an open law book and gavel.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Wary About Extending School Authority Over Student Internet Speech
In arguments, the justices looked for a narrow way to decide a case about the discipline of a cheerleader over a profane Snapchat message.
7 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2021.
Members of the U.S. Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the court on April 23. The justices heard arguments Wednesday in a major case on student speech.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Weigh When School Board Censure of a Member Violates the First Amendment
The justices will decide an issue that has become more salient as a few board members rant inappropriately on social media.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Federal Judge Dismisses Challenge to Transgender-Inclusive Athletics Policy in Connecticut
A federal district court judge said the lawsuit by cisgender female athletes was moot because two transgender track athletes had graduated.
3 min read
In this Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019 photo, Bloomfield High School transgender athlete Terry Miller, second from left, wins the final of the 55-meter dash over transgender athlete Andraya Yearwood, left, and other runners in the Connecticut girls Class S indoor track meet at Hillhouse High School in New Haven, Conn. In the track-and-field community in Connecticut, the dominance of Miller and Yearwood has stirred resentment among some competitors and their families.
Bloomfield High School transgender athlete Terry Miller, second from left, wins the final of the 55-meter dash over transgender athlete Andraya Yearwood, left, and other runners in the Connecticut girls Class S indoor track meet in New Haven, Conn., in February 2019.
Pat Eaton-Robb/AP