States

Texas Republicans Eye Cash Rewards for Districts

By Daarel Burnette II — March 05, 2019 5 min read
Visitors and guests line up in the rotunda of the Texas State Capitol for the beginning of the 86th Texas Legislative session. Lawmakers are poised to tackle a range of school funding issues this session.

For district administrators, just how much does money talk when it comes to boosting test scores?

Texas Republicans are in the thick of designing a statewide funding formula that could answer that question in a very big way.

Under a proposal being prepared by legislative leaders, the state would set aside $800 million annually to reward districts that have various strong outcomes.

In decades past, extra federal and state money across the nation has been distributed to districts that struggle academically. Texas is proposing to, in effect, flip that model on its head by spending more money on districts that meet certain state standards and less money on those that don’t.

“We decided, right or wrong, that it’s better to provide financial rewards, or carrots, than to try to improve districts through our A-F accountability system,” said Todd Williams, the CEO of The Commit Partnership, a Dallas-based advocacy group, who helped design the funding formula. “I think that more money doesn’t necessarily produce great results, but I think money invested strategically can have transformative results.” (The state doesn’t plan to get rid of its controversial A-F system.)

Arizona and Ohio have similar outcomes-based incentive models. And a legislator in Arkansas last month proposed a bill that would punish schools with low reading scores by taking away money set aside for schools with high poverty rates.

Risky Experiment?

But critics in Texas say such an experiment would result in the state shoveling even more money toward already wealthy and academically successful districts, further punish impoverished and academically struggling districts, and give an incentive for superintendents to attempt to game the system.

They point out that proficiency scores have a strong correlation with poverty and that boosting them requires a host of resources, including talented teachers, strong curricula, and wraparound services that can ameliorate the effects of poverty, all of which cost more—not less—money. A rewards-based system would ultimately exacerbate the divide between the haves and have-nots and force teachers to teach to the test, they say.

“Leave it to Texas, the birthplace of statewide testing, to double down on something that research shows does not work,” said Noel Candelaria, the president of Texas State Teachers Association. “We’re just going to end up punishing poor districts for having low test scores and rewarding middle class and rich districts with better funding.”

Teachers plan to rally at the state capitol during their spring break next week to protest the measure, among other things.

Fiscally conservative Texas Republicans, who control the state capital, rushed to replace the funding formula after the state’s supreme court decided in 2016 that, while the state’s spending was discriminatory and ineffective in boosting outcomes, it wasn’t the court’s role to decide how the legislature should spend K-12 dollars.

Taxpayers have long complained about the way the state has captured money from property-rich districts and distributed it to property-poor districts, what’s known as the Robin Hood effect.

A statewide commission recommended in December that Texas spend much more than it has in the past on the state’s poor students, students with special needs, and English-language learners. It also recommended that the state kick in more income and sales tax revenue to offset local property tax revenue.

But what’s gotten the most attention in recent weeks is the proposal buried in the 165-page document that the state set aside incentive money for districts to raise test scores.

While the recommendation deals only with 1 percent of the state’s budget, it could be a windfall for a district where a large portion of students meet statewide benchmarks.

Under the proposal, districts would receive $1,450 more for every student achieving 3rd grade reading proficiency, an amount that would more than double if the student is low-income.

Similarly, a district would receive $2,015 more for every high school student who goes on to enroll in college or the military or graduates with a industry-accepted certificate. That amount also would more than double if the student is low-income. Districts would be allowed to use the extra cash for, among other things, professional development, full-day pre-K, or personalized learning initiatives.

Williams said that the project wouldn’t result in wealthier districts ultimately receiving more money than impoverished districts, since the proposed funding formula would provide more money to districts serving at-risk students.

Dallas Superintendent Michael Hinojosa, who has used a controversial $15 million teacher-pay-incentive program to boost test scores, said administrators would be responsive to a state model that offered them more cash for improving academic outcomes.

“While many of my colleagues are opposed to it, I’m willing to take a look at it,” he said. “Part of our success is, we’ve changed how we’ve organized ourselves to make sure we’re more successful, and none of my employees got a raise until we could prove we’re moving the needle academically.”

In Arizona, state legislators three years ago decided to provide districts with up to $400 more per student in extra state funds for every student who met statewide benchmarks. That came after the state recalibrated its funding formula and replaced it with one that resulted in several tiny, wealthy suburban districts losing millions of dollars.

A study by Anabel Aportela, the director of research for the Arizona School Boards Association, shows that most of that incentive money went to some of the state’s wealthiest districts. The incentive program, she said, never really resonated with district administrators since all the administrators know beforehand which districts will get the money at the end of the year.

“Politicians are assuming that folks are sitting back and waiting for the right set of incentives before they do their job,” Aportela said. “Educators are working very hard to serve these students.”

About 35 states use a similar outcomes-based funding formula for public universities.

While such an approach is highly popular among politicians, said Kevin Dougherty, a researcher at Columbia University’s Teachers College, it has yet to produce tangible outcomes in the higher education arena, according to several studies.

In fact, many researchers point out that the approach has discouraged colleges from enrolling poor high school students who are less likely to complete college in six years, and has financially punished Hispanic-Serving Institutions and Historically Black Colleges and Universities institutions, whose purpose is to serve those students.

“Outcomes-based funding formulas are a way for the government to say to schools that ‘we’re tough, we’re demanding and we’re not going to take excuses.’ This is still a potent rhetoric with the public.”

A version of this article appeared in the March 06, 2019 edition of Education Week as Cash Rewards Weighed for Districts in Texas

Events

Jobs The EdWeek Top School Jobs Virtual Career Fair
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How to Power Your Curriculum With Digital Books
Register for this can’t miss session looking at best practices for utilizing digital books to support their curriculum.
Content provided by OverDrive
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Embracing Student Engagement: The Pathway to Post-Pandemic Learning
As schools emerge from remote learning, educators are understandably worried about content and skills that students would otherwise have learned under normal circumstances. This raises the very real possibility that children will face endless hours
Content provided by Newsela

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

States Opinion The Right and Wrong Way to Address Concerns About Critical Race Theory
Legislators should consciously echo provisions of the Civil Rights Act brushed aside in the excesses of anti-racist education—not ban ideas.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
States Interactive Map: Where Critical Race Theory Is Under Attack
This national map tracks where state legislatures are attempting to limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism in the classroom.
2 min read
States Florida State Board of Education Bans the Use of Critical Race Theory in Schools
Lessons that deal with critical race theory and the “1619 Project” are not welcome in Florida’s public schools following a state board vote.
Jeffrey S. Solochek, Tampa Bay Times
4 min read
Richard Corcoran, the Commissioner of the Florida Department of Education and Board Chair Andy Tuck listen as Dianna Greene, the Superintendent of Duval County Public Schools, addresses the board members during Thursday morning's meeting. The board members of the Florida Department of Education met Thursday, June 10, 2021 at the Florida State College at Jacksonville's Advanced Technology Center in Jacksonville, Fla. to take care of routine business but then held public comments before a vote to remove critical race theory from Florida classrooms.
Richard Corcoran, the commissioner of the Florida Department of Education, and Board Chair Andy Tuck listen as Dianna Greene, the superintendent of Duval County Public Schools, addresses board members before a June 10 vote to remove critical race theory from Florida classrooms.
Bob Self/The Florida Times-Union via AP
States Let School Officials Seek Gun Limits for Potentially Violent Students, Feds Suggest
A model state "red flag" bill would let school officials ask courts to halt students' access to guns if they are deemed a risk.
4 min read
Students protest after the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Fla.
Students protest after the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Fla.
High school students rally at the Capitol in Washington on Feb. 21 in support of those affected at the Parkland High School shooting in Florida. J. Scott Applewhite/AP