Education Funding

Supreme Court in S.C. Sets Stage for Debate On School ‘Adequacy’

By Julie Blair — May 05, 1999 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

South Carolina’s highest court has set the stage for a legal battle over the quality of the state’s public schools.

An April 22 decision in the state supreme court clarifies provisions of the South Carolina Constitution, which mandates a free and open system of education for all, while setting out loose performance-based standards for education.

Essentially, the 4-1 ruling orders a lower-court trial on whether South Carolina is providing an “adequate” education to the state’s 655,400 public school students in grades K-12.

The state has a responsibility to provide children with a “minimally adequate” education, Chief Justice Ernest Finney Jr. wrote for the court majority.

School finance experts say the South Carolina ruling follows a trend in which courts around the nation are judging the legality of state education systems not solely by the amount of money a state spends per school district, but also by the quality of education that students receive.

In its decision, the South Carolina high court dismissed part of the lawsuit that focused on changing the state’s school funding laws.

But the justices ordered that the remainder of the case--which focuses on the adequacy of a student’s education--be returned to a lower court for trial.

The ruling in Abbeville County School District v. South Carolina is a defining one in that it sets standards for performance with no guidance on how to pay for schools, said John Augenblick of Augenblick & Myers, a Denver-based school finance consulting firm.

“South Carolina ... has changed the bar,” Mr. Augenblick said last week. “They’ve changed the way you think about this stuff.”

“I am confident that South Carolina can meet the legal test set down by the court when this matter is litigated further,” Gov. Jim Hodges, a Democrat, said in a statement after the ruling. “However, I believe our goal in South Carolina should be to create excellent schools, not just ‘minimally adequate’ schools.”

Carl B. Epps III, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement: “The responsibility for ensuring that every child, no matter where he or she lives and regardless of his or her school district’s financial well-being, now rests squarely on the state.”

State officials and others said they could not predict when the case might go to trial.

Focus on Standards

The decision comes six years after lawyers for 30 districts sued the state, arguing that South Carolina’s education funding formula was unfair to rural and poor schools.

By this year, more than 37 school districts--out of 95 in the state--as well as more than 60 parents and students had joined the lawsuit.

In laying out the standards by which the state’s school system should be judged, Chief Justice Finney wrote that students must have the ability to read, write, and speak the English language and have a fundamental understanding of mathematics, physical science, economics, social and political systems, and history and governmental processes, as well as academic and vocational skills.

“We do not intend by this opinion to suggest to any party that we will usurp the authority of [the legislative] branch to determine the way in which educational opportunities are delivered to the children of our state,” he wrote. “We do not intend for the courts of this state to become super-legislatures or super- school boards.”

For many years, state courts ruled that fiscal equity meant that students were receiving equal educational opportunities, said Allan Odden, a co-director of the Consortium for Policy Research in Education, in Madison, Wis., and a professor of education at the University of Wisconsin there.

For the past 10 years, however, the courts have shifted that belief, Mr. Odden said in an interview.

Today, courts are more concerned with educational adequacy and ensuring that students receive the same quality of education regardless of how much money is spent to achieve the goal, according to Mr. Odden.

Courts in Alabama, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, West Virginia, and Wyoming have all handed down rulings on adequacy, he said.

“The courts are saying that [state standards] are a pretty good idea, and that we need to marry finance with standards and programs,” Mr. Odden said.

A version of this article appeared in the May 05, 1999 edition of Education Week as Supreme Court in S.C. Sets Stage for Debate On School ‘Adequacy’

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Deepen the Reach and Impact of Your Leadership
This webinar offers new and veteran leaders a unique opportunity to listen and interact with four of the most influential educational thinkers in North America. With their expert insights, you will learn the key elements
Content provided by Solution Tree
Science K-12 Essentials Forum Teaching Science Today: Challenges and Solutions
Join this event which will tackle handling controversy in the classroom, and making science education relevant for all students.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Stronger Together: Integrating Social and Emotional Supports in an Equity-Based MTSS
Decades of research have shown that when schools implement evidence-based social and emotional supports and programming, academic achievement increases. The impact of these supports – particularly for students of color, students from low-income communities, English
Content provided by Illuminate Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding More Federal Aid Is Coming for Schools Struggling to Buy Food Due to Supply-Chain Crisis
The $1.5 billion USDA infusion is the second in several months to help schools purchase food amid shortages and price increases.
2 min read
Stacked Red Cafeteria trays in a nearly empty lunch room.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Education Funding School Districts Are Starting to Spend COVID Relief Funds. The Hard Part Is Deciding How
A new database shows districts' spending priorities for more than $122 billion in federal aid are all over the place.
8 min read
Educators delivering money.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Education Funding The Political Spotlight on Schools' COVID Relief Money Isn't Going Away
Politicians and researchers are among those scrutinizing the use and oversight of billions in pandemic education aid.
7 min read
Business man with brief case looking under a giant size bill (money).
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Education Funding Here's How Schools Can Use Federal COVID Aid to Solve Bus Driver and Other Transportation Woes
The Education Department outlines districts' options for using relief money to solve nationwide problems in getting kids to and from school.
2 min read
Students catch their bus near Ambridge Area Senior High School on the first day of Pennsylvania's mask mandate for K-12 schools and day care centers on Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2021, in Ambridge, Pa.
Students catch their bus near Ambridge Area Senior High School in Ambridge, Pa., earlier this year on the first day of Pennsylvania's mask mandate for K-12 schools.
Andrew Rush/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette via AP