Law & Courts

Student Survey Found to Violate Federal Law

By Darcia Harris Bowman — January 09, 2002 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A New Jersey school district broke a little-known federal law two years ago when it surveyed students on drugs, sex, and other sensitive topics, the U.S. Department of Education has declared.

The 5,200-student Ridgewood, N.J., district violated the federal Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment by requiring almost 2,000 students to answer questions about their sexual habits, their experience with drugs and alcohol, and their mental health in a 156-question poll paid for with federal Goals 2000 money, according to the department ruling issued last month.

Prompted by complaints from several Ridgewood parents, the decision is based largely on affidavits from four students who said they believed the survey in the fall of 1999 was mandatory.

“I was very pleased with the ruling—it vindicated me,” said Carole A. Nunn, one of the parents who filed a complaint with the department. “This is a message to other school districts who think they can do these surveys without getting parents’ permission: You better think again because you could find yourself in a lawsuit, or a federal investigation, or risk losing federal funds.”

Although the department’s decision carried no penalties for the Ridgewood schools, the district must furnish evidence within the next month that it has reminded its officials about the law’s requirement for written parental consent before students fill out such surveys.

Findings Disputed

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment requires districts to get written parental consent before students fill out any survey that is financed with money from the federal Education Department and asks personal questions on such matters as political affiliation, psychological problems, sexual behavior and attitudes, critical appraisals of family relationships, income, illegal or self-incriminating behavior, or relationships with lawyers, doctors, or ministers. (“Parental Rights at Issue in Probe of Student Survey,” Jan. 26, 2000.)

Some district officials dismissed the ruling as unsubstantiated.

“I thought it was a disgrace, quite frankly, and an embarrassment to the Department of Education,” said Charles V. Reilly, the president of the Ridgewood school board. “How you draw such sweeping conclusions from so little evidence—it’s outrageous. There’s no question we’re being used as a whipping boy by people who are, in my view, conservative extremists.”

Ms. Nunn said she hopes the ruling can be used as evidence in an ongoing federal lawsuit against the district, in which three Ridgewood parents allege the school system violated the constitutional rights of parents and students when it administered the survey.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the January 09, 2002 edition of Education Week as Student Survey Found to Violate Federal Law


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
From Chaos to Clarity: How to Master EdTech Management and Future-Proof Your Evaluation Processes
The road to a thriving educational technology environment is paved with planning, collaboration, and effective evaluation.
Content provided by Instructure
Special Education Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table - Special Education: Proven Interventions for Academic Success
Special education should be a launchpad, not a label. Join the conversation on how schools can better support ALL students.
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Innovative Approaches to Special Education
Join this free virtual event to explore innovations in the evolving landscape of special education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Court Backs School That Barred Student's 'Two Genders' Shirt
The court said the shirt could be understood to demean transgender and gender-nonconforming students, and administrators could prohibit it.
5 min read
ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation David Cortman, left, and Liam Morrison speak at a press conference following oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit on Feb. 8, 2024.
David Cortman, senior counsel and vice president of Alliance Defending Freedom, left, and middle school student Liam Morrison speak to reporters following oral arguments over Morrison's "There Are Only Two Genders" T-shirt before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit in Boston on Feb. 8, 2024.
Courtesy of Alliance Defending Freedom
Law & Courts Federal Judge Overturns New Hampshire Law on Teaching 'Divisive Concepts'
The judge holds that the law is unconstitutionally vague because it does not make clear to educators what topics they may not teach.
4 min read
Students walk into the front doors at Hinsdale Middle High School, in Hinsdale, N.H., on the first day of school on Aug. 30, 2022.
Students walk into Hinsdale Middle High School, in Hinsdale, N.H., in August 2022. A federal judge has struck down a New Hampshire law that bars the teaching of "divisive concepts" to K-12 students.
Kristopher Radder/The Brattleboro Reformer via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Turns Down Case Challenging School District's Transgender Policies
The case involves a policy allowing information to be withheld from parents considered not supportive of a gender-transitioning child.
3 min read
This Oct. 4, 2018, photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. The Supreme Court has declined to take up an appeal from parents in Oregon who want to prevent transgender students from using locker rooms and bathrooms of the gender with which they identify, rather than their sex assigned at birth.
This Oct. 4, 2018, photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court at sunset in Washington. The court has declined to take up an appeal from parents in Maryland challenging a school district's policy on gender-support plans for students.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
Law & Courts District Can Deny Opt-Outs on LGBTQ+ Books, Court Rules
Religious parents objected to a Maryland district's policy ending opt-outs for elementary school 'storybooks' with LGBTQ+ themes.
5 min read
A pedestrian passes by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse, June 16, 2021, on Main Street in Richmond, Va.
A person walks near the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit's courthouse in Richmond, Va. A panel of the court denied an injunction seeking to restore religious parents' opportunity to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ "storybooks" in a Maryland district.
Steve Helber/AP