Law & Courts

Special Session Called to Deal With Kansas School-Aid Showdown

By Daarel Burnette II — June 07, 2016 | Updated: June 09, 2016 4 min read
Kansas Supreme Court Justice Marla Luckert asks a question during arguments in a lawsuit over the state’s school funding formula. The court’s ruling that the formula is inequitable has led to a showdown between the justices and state lawmakers.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

In order to avoid a school-funding shutdown looming at the end of the month, Kansas politicians will hold a special session to attempt to address a state supreme court order to more equitably fund their schools.

Republican Gov. Sam Brownback’s June 7 call for a special session came a week after several top Kansas Republican lawmakers threatened to defy yet another court order to provide poor districts more money or not be allowed to distribute any state aid. Over the last few weeks, local district officials have been writing contingency plans on how they would proceed without $4 billion in state aid.

On May 27—for the second time this year—the Kansas Supreme Court struck down the legislature’s funding formula on the grounds that it does not equitably distribute state aid among its school districts.

The legislature, which officially ended its session last June 1, will have until the end of the month to figure out a new finance formula or the state supreme court says it will prohibit any state aid from being distributed.

The special session comes on the cusp of what’s expected to be a hotly contested election season where a large portion of the legislators are up for reelection.

Parents and teachers would not be happy with schools shut down due to lack of state aid.

Lack of Consensus

Several of the state’s top legislators said last week that there is no consensus on what to do next. Some don’t want to do anything at all.

"[These legislators] have gone out of their way to pick a fight,” said Senate Majority Leader Terry Bruce, a Republican, emphasizing the seriousness of the threat. “It’s gotten to a breaking point.”

A ruling on whether the new funding formula is adequate is expected later this summer. If the state loses that case, the legislature will be forced to find close to $400 million more for Kansas’ districts.

The case, Gannon v. Kansas, was brought by four poor school districts in 2010. The court first ruled in 2014 that the state’s funding formula was inequitable.

After the governor and legislature made another round of cuts to state aid for districts, the high court again ruled in February that the finance formula was inequitable. The court estimated that the formula left districts more than $54 million short in annual funding. In that ruling, the court first said it would shut down the state’s school districts if the legislature didn’t come up with a satisfactory formula by June 30.

The legislature, late in its session, quickly—and Democrats said illegally—pushed through a bill known as the Classroom Learning Assuring Student Success Act. The law would have put $2 million more a year into the school finance formula and done it in a way that the state’s wealthy districts wouldn’t suffer financially.

In its ruling issued in late May, the court described the state’s current funding formula as still inequitable and disproportionately burdensome on local taxpayers. The justices said that “political necessities” were irrelevant to their review, and that if schools were to close, state lawmakers, not the court, would be to blame.

“Simply put, the legislature’s unconstitutional enactment is void; it has not performed its duty,” said the ruling, signed by all seven justices.

The state education department estimates that satisfying the ruling will cost the state between $38 million and $51 million a year.

In reacting to the ruling, the governor and state lawmakers didn’t mince words.

“The court has yet again demonstrated it is the most political body in the state of Kansas,” said Gov. Brownback. He referred to the ruling as “political brinksmanship.” House Speaker Ray Merrick, a Republican, said the court was “holding children hostage.”

But for leaders of the state’s poorest districts, who have frozen teacher salaries, implemented four-day school weeks, and, as a last resort, dramatically increased local property taxes, the court’s ruling was a relief, and they amped up the pressure for the legislature to increase funding.

“Shutting down the school system on July 1 would have disastrous effects on our fine public schools and state,” the Kansas Association of School Boards said in a statement. “We strongly urge our elected leaders to continue working on providing a constitutional system for all of our students and resolve this issue as soon as possible.”

Power Struggle

The case has become one of the starkest examples in the country of how much power state supreme courts have in shaping school finance.

The legislature had to make deep state budget cuts in recent years after lawmakers in 2012 made a series of income-tax reductions they said were intended to spur the economy, which has not yet come to fruition.

Brownback hasn’t made clear what he or senior Republican officials would propose in the special session. The state’s Democrats, who are in the minority, have proposed to revert to an old formula, an effort the court has describe as a “safe harbor.”

In response to the supreme court’s school finance decision and other rulings, state legislators in recent months have campaigned to have the appointed justices removed from office this fall. Kansas voters can remove appointed judges in what are known as retention votes.

The Associated Press contributed to this article.
A version of this article appeared in the June 08, 2016 edition of Education Week as Kansas Districts Gird for Funding Shutdown After Court Ruling

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure & Management Webinar
From Chaos to Clarity: How to Master EdTech Management and Future-Proof Your Evaluation Processes
The road to a thriving educational technology environment is paved with planning, collaboration, and effective evaluation.
Content provided by Instructure
Special Education Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table - Special Education: Proven Interventions for Academic Success
Special education should be a launchpad, not a label. Join the conversation on how schools can better support ALL students.
Special Education K-12 Essentials Forum Innovative Approaches to Special Education
Join this free virtual event to explore innovations in the evolving landscape of special education.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Title IX Rule to Protect LGBTQ+ Students Temporarily Blocked in 4 States
A federal judge in Louisiana delivered the first legal blow to the Biden administration's interpretation of Title IX.
4 min read
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and healthcare stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Republican states are filing a barrage of legal challenges against the Biden administration's newly expanded campus sexual assault rules, saying they overstep the president's authority and undermine the Title IX anti-discrimination law.
Demonstrators advocating for transgender rights and health care stand outside of the Ohio Statehouse on Jan. 24, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. Republican states have filed a barrage of legal challenges against the Biden administration's new Title IX rule, and one of them has just resulted in a temporary order blocking the rule in four states.
Patrick Orsagos/AP
Law & Courts Judge Strikes Down Title IX Guidance on LGBTQ+ Students. Here's Why It Matters
In a June 11 ruling, Texas judge said the Education Department has no authority to expand protections under Title IX.
8 min read
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at a news conference in Dallas on June 22, 2017.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at a news conference in Dallas on June 22, 2017. His office sued the Biden administration in an attempt to invalidate guidance it released in June 2021 stating it would interpret Title IX to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Tony Gutierrez/AP
Law & Courts Court Backs School That Barred Student's 'Two Genders' Shirt
The court said the shirt could be understood to demean transgender and gender-nonconforming students, and administrators could prohibit it.
5 min read
ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation David Cortman, left, and Liam Morrison speak at a press conference following oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit on Feb. 8, 2024.
David Cortman, senior counsel and vice president of Alliance Defending Freedom, left, and middle school student Liam Morrison speak to reporters following oral arguments over Morrison's "There Are Only Two Genders" T-shirt before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit in Boston on Feb. 8, 2024.
Courtesy of Alliance Defending Freedom
Law & Courts Federal Judge Overturns New Hampshire Law on Teaching 'Divisive Concepts'
The judge holds that the law is unconstitutionally vague because it does not make clear to educators what topics they may not teach.
4 min read
Students walk into the front doors at Hinsdale Middle High School, in Hinsdale, N.H., on the first day of school on Aug. 30, 2022.
Students walk into Hinsdale Middle High School, in Hinsdale, N.H., in August 2022. A federal judge has struck down a New Hampshire law that bars the teaching of "divisive concepts" to K-12 students.
Kristopher Radder/The Brattleboro Reformer via AP